Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:19:39.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The biology of Calocaris macandreae [Crustacea: Thalassinidea]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

John B. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dove Marine Laboratory, Cullercoats

Extract

Previous work on the biology and distribution of Calocaris is discussed briefly. The distribution in Northumberland waters is considered in relation to depth and bottom sediment.

Quantitative monthly samples show that population numbers remain very stable throughout the year. A well marked egg-laying period occurs in January-February when relatively few eggs (average 38) are attached to the pleopods. Eggs are carried for 8–9 months and hatch in September-October. By a combination of size-frequency distribution and gonad-developmnt classification the age-groups in the population are interpreted. After passing through a phase of testes development and spermatophore formation individuals lay their first batch of eggs at the end of the 5th year. The ovaries regenerate over a 2-year period and a second egg-laying takes place at the end of the 7th year with a possible third at the end of the 9th year.

The incidence of soft individuals in the samples together with observed changes in the coverage with epifaunistic growths indicate that after entering the 5th year a single annual moult cycle begins with a slowing down in growth rate.

Population numbers, fecundity and larval survival are discussed. Both the survival curve and the apparent lack of serious predation suggest that the population reaches senescence

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. A., 1960. On the biology of Crangon allmani Kinahan in Northumberland waters. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp.481508.Google Scholar
Baird, R. H., 1959. A preliminary account of a new half square metre bottom sampler. (Title only.)Rapp. Proc. Verb., Vol. 146, p. 48.Google Scholar
Bell, T., 1853. A History of the British Stalk-eyed Crustacea. London.Google Scholar
Blegvad, H., 1914. Food and conditions of nourishment among the communities of invertebrate animals found on or in the sea bottom in Danish waters. Rep. Danish biol. Sta., Vol. 22, pp. 4178.Google Scholar
Bourdillon-Casanova, L., 1960. Le meroplancton du Golfe de Marseile-Les larves de Crustaces Dècapodes. Rec. Trav. Sta. mar. Endowne, Fasc. 30, pp. 1286.Google Scholar
Bull, H. O., 1933. The newly hatched larva of Calocaris macandreae Bell. Rep. Dove mar. Lab., Ser. 3, No. 1, pp. 4850.Google Scholar
Carlisle, D. B., 1960. Sexual differentiation in Crustacea Malacostraca. Mem. Soc. Endocrinol., Vol. 7, pp. 915.Google Scholar
Comfort, A., 1956. The Biology of Senescence. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elmhirst, R., 1935. Rep. Scot. mar. biol. Ass., 1934–35, P. 15.Google Scholar
Gurney, R., 1942. Larvae of Decapod Crustacea. London.Google Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J., 1913. Valuation of the sea, II. The animal communities of the sea bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Rep. Danish biol. Sta., Vol. 21, pp. 142.Google Scholar
Runnstrom, S., 1925. Beitrag zur Kenntnis einiger hermaphroditischen, dekapoden Crustaceen. Bergens Mus. Skr., N.F., Bd. 3, pp. 1115.Google Scholar
Selbie, C. M., 1915. The Decapoda Reptantia of the coasts of Ireland. Pt. I. Sci. Invest. Fish. Br. Ire., 1914, No. I, 116 pp.Google Scholar
Soot-Ryen, T., 1955. Calocaris macandreae Bell in Northern Norway. Astarte, No. 10, pp. 13.Google Scholar
Whiteaves, J. F., 1874. On recent deep-sea dredging operations in the Gulf of St Lawrence. Amer. J. Sci., Ser. 3, Vol. 7, pp. 210219.Google Scholar
Wollebaek, A., 1908. Remarks on decapod crustaceans of the North Atlantic and Norwegian fjords. Bergens Mus. Aarb., No. 12, 74 pp.Google Scholar