Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:29:01.595Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial substrates as a means of monitoring rocky shore cryptofauna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. A. Myers  and
T. Southgate
A. A. Myers
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cork
T. Southgate
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cork
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two types of artificial substrate (nylon pan-scourers) have been shown to be highly efficient collectors of cryptofauna on rocky shores. The communities which develop in them are closely similar to those which develop in naturally occurring red algal turfs in Bantry Bay. The physical structure of the red algae appears to be the prime factor in determining the development of populations of most of the cryptofaunal species studied. In monitoring protocols artificial substrates of the types described here can be substituted for naturally occurring red algae in studies on shore cryptofauna obviating the necessity for destructive sampling of algae and facilitating statistical analysis by providing a standard ‘unit’ of substrate for comparative purposes. Furthermore, recruitment intensity of two species of gastropod has been shown to be similar in the artificial substrates to that in natural turfs

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , November 1980 , pp. 963 - 975
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bishop, M. J. & Bishop, S. J., 1973. Associations of molluscs and marine plants at San Diego, California. Journal of Conchology, 28, 43–54.Google Scholar
Fager, E. W., 1971. Pattern in the development of a marine community. Limnology and Oceanography, 16, 241–253.Google Scholar
Frank, P. W., 1965. The biodemography of an intertidal snail population. Ecology, 46, 831–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretter, V. & Manly, R., 1977. Algal associations of Tricolia pullus, Lacuna vincta and Cerithiopsis tubercularis (Gastropoda) with special reference to the settlement of their larvae. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 999–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghelardi, R., 1960. Structure and Dynamics of the Animal Community Found in Macrocystis pyrifera holdfasts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Ghelardi, R. J., 1971. ‘Species’ structure of the animal community that lives in Macrocystis pyrifera holdfasts. In The Biology of Giant Kelp Beds (Macrocystis in California (ed. North, W. J.), pp. 831–420. Lehre: Verlag von J. Cramer. [Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia, no. 32].Google Scholar
Gray, J. S., 1979. Pollution-induced changes in populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (B), 286, 545–561.Google ScholarPubMed
Kensler, C. B. & Crisp, D. J., 1965. The colonization of artificial crevices by marine invertebrates. Journal of Animal Ecology, 34, 507–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiseleva, G. A., 1967. Influence of the substratum on the settlement and metamorphosis of benthic fauna. Akademiya Nauk Ukrainskai S.S.R., Kiev, 1, 71–84.Google Scholar
Scheltma, R. S., 1961. Metamorphosis of the veliger larvae of Nassarius obsoletus (Gastropoda) in response to bottom sediment. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 120, 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, A., 1974. Experimental zoogeography: colonization of marine mini-islands. American Naturalist, 108, 715–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheader, M., 1978. Distribution and reproductive biology of Corophium insidiosum (Amphipoda) on the north-east coast of England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 58, 585–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Struhsaker, J. W. & Costlow, J. D., 1968. Larval development of Littorina picta (Prosobranchia, Mesogastropoda), reared in the laboratory. Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 38, 153–160.Google Scholar
Wieser, W., 1952. Investigations on the microfauna inhabiting seaweeds on rocky coasts. IV. Studies on the vertical distribution of the fauna inhabiting seaweeds below the Plymouth Laboratory. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 31, 145–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigham, G. D., 1975. The biology and ecology of Rissoa parva (da Costa) (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar