Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T12:52:51.989Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An experimental study of the pattern and significance of the climbing behaviour of Hydrobia ulvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

R. S. K. Barnes
R. S. K. Barnes
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The climbing behaviour of the gastropod Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) and its relationship with flotation/dispersal were investigated by field observations and experiments in Norfolk, U.K. and by laboratory experiments. Field experiments of the type used by previous authors were discontinued when it was observed that counts at low tide of snails which had climbed objects the previous high tide did not reflect adequately climbing activity during that period of tidal cover. Both field and laboratory studies yielded five general results: (i) snails climbed only when covered by tidal water; (ii) climbing activity was not related to population density; (iii) climbing activity, under conditions of constant population density, varied markedly during the cycle of spring tidal cover, reaching a peak after the first few tides and declining rapidly thereafter; (iv) maximum numbers of snails were present on submerged structures relatively early in any given period of cover and declined (snails crawled downwards off the structure) as the period of cover continued; and (v) rarely were large proportions of climbed Hydrobia floated off their support by the incoming tide; this was associated only with conditions of extreme calm.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , May 1981 , pp. 285 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A., 1971. Intertidal activity, breeding and the floating habit of Hydrobia ulvae in the Ythan Estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R. S. K., 1979. Intrapopulation variation in Hydrobia sediment preferences. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 9, 231–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R. S. K. & Greenwood, J. G., 1978. The response of the intertidal gastropod Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant) to sediments of differing particle size. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 31, 43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertness, M. D., 1977. Behavioural and ecological aspects of shore-level size gradients in Thais lamellosa and Thais emarginata. Ecology, 58, 86–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. J., 1979. Relationships between height on the shore and size distributions of Thais spp. (Gastropoda: Muricidae). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 41, 163–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenchel, T., 1975. Factors determining the distribution patterns of mud snails (Hydrobiidae). Oecologia, 20, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holme, N. A., 1949. The fauna of sand and mud banks near the mouth of the Exe Estuary. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 29, 189–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassen, H. H., 1979. Reproductive effort in Danish mudsnails (Hydrobiidae). Oecologia, 40, 365–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levinton, J. S., 1979. The effect of density upon deposit-feeding populations: movement, feeding and floating of Hydrobia ventrosa Montagu (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Oecologia, 43, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linke, O., 1939. Die Biota des Jadesbusenwattes. Helgoländer wissenschaftliche Meeresuntersuchungen, 1, 201–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, G. & Nix, W., 1976. The burrowing and floating behaviour of the gastropod Hydrobia ulvae. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science, 4, 537–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, G. E., 1958 a. The behaviour of Littorina littorea (L.) under natural conditions and its relation to position on the shore. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, G. E., 1958 b. An experimental analysis of the behaviour of Littorina littorea (L.) under natural conditions and in the laboratory. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. C., 1960. The behaviour of Hydrobia ulvae. Report of the Challenger Society, 3 (12), 29–30.Google Scholar
Newell, R. C., 1962. Behavioural aspects of the ecology of Peringia (= Hydrobia) ulvae (Pennant). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 138, 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. C., 1964. Some factors controlling the upstream distribution of Hydrobia ulvae (Pennant). Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 142, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, R. C., 1979. Biology of Intertidal Animals, 3rd edition. 781 pp. Faversham: Marine Ecological Surveys.Google Scholar
Underwood, A. J., 1972 a. Tide-model analysis of the zonation of intertidal prosobranchs. I. Four species of Littorina (L.) Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 9, 239–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, A. J., 1972 b. Tide-model analysis of the zonation of intertidal prosobranchs. II. Four species of trochids (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 9, 257–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vader, W. J. M., 1964. A preliminary investigation into the reactions of the infauna of the tidal flats to tidal fluctuations in water level. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 2, 189–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar