ON SOME HIGH-INDICES THEOREMS II

Abstract

Let us suppose that

formula here

with

formula here

converges for s>0. If the series converges to sum A for s = 0, then f(s)→A as s→0+, but the converse will not hold without an additional, Tauberian, hypothesis. The usual form of such a hypothesis is a condition on {a_n}, but in the ‘high-indices’ theorem of Hardy and Littlewood [4], the hypothesis is a condition on {λ_n}. They showed that if

formula here

then the existence and finiteness of lim_s→0+f(s) imply the convergence of [sum ]a_n.

The condition (1.3) is usually referred to as the ‘Hadamard gap condition’ and a series (1.1) such that {λ_n} satisfies (1.3) is called a lacunary series, although this terminology is occasionally used for series satisfying other gap conditions.

Zygmund has shown [15] that if the function f(s), defined as in (1.1) by a lacunary series, is of bounded variation in (0, ∞), then [sum ]a_n converges absolutely. Clearly, the converse implication holds.

The result of Zygmund has the form

formula here

an uppercase letter with subscripts here denoting, as it will throughout this paper, a constant determined by the indicated subscripts.

The result of Zygmund and that of Hardy and Littlewood are the extreme cases, corresponding to m = 1 and m = ∞ of the inequality

formula here

which holds for m[ges ]1 and which, with more general results, is to be found in the first part of this paper [8].

In all of these results, the interval of integration can be reduced to a finite interval (0, B_q,λ1).