Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T19:00:22.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

BETTI NUMBERS OF SEMIALGEBRAIC AND SUB-PFAFFIAN SETS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2004

A. GABRIELOV
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, [email protected]
N. VOROBJOV
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY [email protected]
T. ZELL
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Let $X$ be a subset in $[-1,1]^{n_0}\,{\subset}\,\Real^{n_0}$ defined by the formula \[ X=\{ {\bf x}_0\,{\mid}\,Q_1{\bf x}_1 Q_2{\bf x}_2 \cdots Q_{\nu}{\bf x}_{\nu} (({\bf x}_0,{\bf x}_1,\,{\ldots}\,,{\bf x}_{\nu}) \in X_{\nu})\}, \] where $Q_i \in \{ \exists, \forall \}$, $Q_i \neq Q_{i{+}1}$, ${\bf x}_i \in \Real^{n_i}$, and $X_{\nu}$ may be either an open or a closed set in $[-1,1]^{n_0+ \cdots +n_{\nu}}{\!}$, being the difference between a finite CW-complex and its subcomplex. An upper bound on each Betti number of $X$ is expressed via a sum of Betti numbers of some sets defined by quantifier-free formulae involving $X_{\nu}$.

In important particular cases of semialgebraic and semi-Pfaffian sets defined by quantifier-free formulae with polynomials and Pfaffian functions respectively, upper bounds on Betti numbers of $X_{\nu}$ are well known. The results allow to extend the bounds to sets defined with quantifiers, in particular to sub-Pfaffian sets.

Type
Notes and Papers
Copyright
The London Mathematical Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)