Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:24:36.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The VoQS System for the Transcription of Voice Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Martin J. Ball ,
John Esling  and
Craig Dickson
Martin J. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Behavioural and Communication Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim BT37 0QB. N. Ireland
John Esling
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C.CanadaV8W 3P4
Craig Dickson
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C.CanadaV8W 3P4
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While the history of interest in voice quality dates back at least as far as Henry Sweet (e.g. 1890), there was for many years little agreement on how to classify voice quality or how to transcribe it as part of a phonetic transcription. Indeed, there is not even agreement on precisely what the term covers in that it is often restricted to aspects of voice quality derived from vocal fold activity, rather than the fuller meaning which encompasses features derived from supralaryngeal settings of the articulators. Authors such as Nolan (1983) have used the phrase long-term quality as an alternative; however, in this article we will retain the traditional term but with a wide application to account for voice quality derived from airflow features, vocal fold activity, and supralaryngeal activity.

Type
Phonetic Representation
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , December 1995 , pp. 71 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, W. A. and Singh, W. (1990). Analysis of fundamental frequency and temporal characteristics of neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speech. Proceedings of the International Acoustics Association 12 (10), 25–32.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, W. A. and Singh, W. (1992). Perceptual comparison of neoglottal, oesophageal and normal speakers. Folia Phoniatrica 44, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, M. J. (1991). Recent developments in the transcription of non-normal speech. Journal of Communication Disorders 24, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, M. J., Code, C., Rahilly, J. and Hazlett, D. (1994). Non-segmental aspects of disordered speech: Developments in transcription. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 8, 67–83.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. and Ball, M. J. (1993). Characteristics of atypical speech currently not included in the Extensions to the IPA. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23, 35–38.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Duckworth, M., Allen, G., Hardcastle, W. and Ball, M. J. (1990). Extensions to the International Phonetic Alphabet for the transcription of atypical speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 4, 273–280.Google Scholar
Edels, Y. (1983). Pseudo-voice: its theory and practice. In Edels, Y. (editor), Laryngectomy: Diagnosis to Rehabilitation. 107–141. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. (1978). Voice Quality in Edinburgh: A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Study. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Esling, J. H. (1994). Voice Quality. In Asher, R. and Simpson, J. (editors), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press. Pp. 4950–4953.Google Scholar
Hewlett, N. and Cohen, W. (1993). Voicing distinctions in electrolarynx speech. Paper presented at the Third Congress of the International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association, Helsinki.Google Scholar
ICPLA Executive Committee (1994). The extIPA chart. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 24.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1975). Individual Features in Voice Quality. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1979). Voice Quality: A Classified Bibliography. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luchsinger, R. and Arnold, G. D. (1965). Voice-Speech-Language. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (1983). The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, A. (1983). The speech therapist's role in surgical and prosthetic approaches to speech rehabilitation, with particular reference to the Blom-Singer and Panjé techniques. In Edels, Y. (editor), Laryngectomy: Diagnosis to Rehabilitation. 271–288. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Singh, W. (1993a). Fistula speech. In Singh, W. and Soutar, D. (editors), Functional Surgery of the Larynx and Pharynx, 171–203. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Singh, W. (1993b). Parsimonious laryngectomee. In Singh, W. and Soutar, D. (editors), Functional Surgery of the Larynx and Pharynx, 116–146. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
Sweet, H. (1890). A Primer of Phonetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Winter, H. and Martin, S. (1981) The classification of deviant voice quality through auditory memory training. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 16, 204–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar