Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:03:28.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Variation and change in the trap and strut vowels of RP: a real time comparison of five acoustic data sets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2007

Anne H. Fabricius
Anne H. Fabricius*
Affiliation:
Department of Culture and Identity, Roskilde [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study examines evidence for change in real time within the short vowel subsystem of the RP accent of English over the course of the twentieth century. It compares plots of average formant positions for the short vowels, stemming from several data corpora. It furthermore describes a change over time in the juxtaposition of the trap and strut vowels as captured in the calculated angle and distance between the two, using trap as a fixed point. This representation of a relationship in a single measurement by means of angle calculation is a methodological innovation for the sociophonetic enterprise. A value specifying the geometric relationship between two vowel positions is precise and replicable, as well as abstract enough to be comparable across data sets. Differences between ‘phonetic’ and ‘sociolinguistic’ stances on the interpretation of acoustic vowel data in formant plots and the issue of suitable vowel normalisation procedures for sociophonetics will also be discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , December 2007 , pp. 293 - 320
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adank, P., Smits, R. & Van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116, 3099–3107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bauer, L. (1985). Tracing phonetic change in the Received Pronunciation of British English. Journal of Phonetics 13, 61–81.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1994). Watching Language Change. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Byrne, C. & Foulkes, P. (2004). The ‘mobile phone effect’ on vowel formants. Speech, Language and the Law 11, 83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, B. & Mees, I. M. (1999). The Real Professor Higgins: The Life and Career of Daniel Jones. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1994). Gimson's Pronunciation of English (5th edn. of Gimson 1962). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (2001). Gimson's Pronunciation of English (6th edn. of Gimson 1962). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Deterding, D. (1997). The formants of monophthong vowels in Standard Southern British English pronunciation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27, 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, A. H. (2000). T-glottalling between Stigma and Prestige: A Sociolinguistic Study of Modern RP. Ph.D. thesis, Copenhagen Business School. http://www.akira.ruc.dk/~fabri/Fabricius-2000-PhD-thesis.pdf (accessed 10 May 2007).Google Scholar
Fabricius, A. H. (2002a). Weak vowels in modern RP: an acoustic study of happy-tensing and kit/schwa shift. Language Variation and Change 14, 211–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabricius, A. H. (2002b). RP as sociolinguistic object. Nordic Journal of English Studies 1, 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foget Hansen, G. & Pharao, N. (2006). Microphones and measurements. Working Papers (Lund University, Centre for Languages and Literature) 52, 49–52.Google Scholar
French, J. P., Harrison, P. & WINDSOR Lewis, J. (2006). R versus John Samuel Humble: the Yorkshire Ripper Hoaxer trial. The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 13, 255–273.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1962). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English (1st edn.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1970). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English (2nd edn.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1980). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English (3rd edn.). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Gordon, E. M., Campbell, L., Hay, J., Maclagan, M., Sudbury, A. & Trudgill, P. (2004). New Zealand English: Its Origins and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J. (2006). An acoustic analysis of happy-tensing in the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics 34, 439–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson, C. I. (2000). Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen's Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, S. & Midgley, J. (2005). Formant frequencies of RP monophthongs in four age groups of speakers. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollien, H. & Schwartz, R. (2000). Aural-perceptual speaker identification: problems with non-contemporary samples. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 7, 199–211.Google Scholar
Johnson, K. (1997). Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1909). The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1918). An Outline of English Phonetics (1st edn.). Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1932). An Outline of English Phonetics (3rd edn.). New York: Dutton & Co.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1956). An Outline of English Phonetics (8th edn.). Cambridge: Heffer and Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamata, M. (2006). A sociophonetic study of the dress, trap and strut vowels of London English. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 44 pages. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/linguistics/WPL/WP2006/6.pdf (accessed 8 February 2007).Google Scholar
Koopmans-Van Beinum, F. J. (1980). Vowel Contrast Reduction: An Acoustical and Perceptual Study of Dutch Vowels in Various Speech Conditions. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Künzel, H. J. (2001). Beware of the ‘telephone effect’: the influence of telephone transmission on the measurement of formant frequencies. Forensic Linguistics 8, 80–99.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1994). Principles of Linguistic Change (vol. 1): Internal Factors. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Yaeger, M. & Steiner, R. (1972). A Quantitative Study of Sound Change in Progress. Philadelphia, PA: US Regional Survey.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. (1996). The Sounds of the World's Languages. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Lobanov, B. M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 606–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, R. K. S. (1988). RP R.I.P. Applied Linguistics 9, 115–124. [Reprinted in Macaulay, R. K. S. (1977). Standards and Variation in Urban Speech (Varieties of English around the World G20), 35–44. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. (2001). Received Pronunciation: who ‘receives’ it and how long will it be ‘received’? Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 36, 15–33.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, L. (2003). Talking Proper: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol (2nd edn.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. (1978). Phonetic Feature Systems for Vowels. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Nolan, F. (1983). The Phonetic Bases of Speaker Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, P. (2004). British English: Received Pronunciation (Illustrations of the IPA). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, P. & Hartman, J. (1997). English Pronouncing Dictionary (15th edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, P., Knowles, G., Varadi, T. & Arnfield, S. (1993). MARSEC: a machine-readable spoken English corpus. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. R. (2001). An Acoustic Analysis of Vowel Variation in New World English (American Dialect Society 85). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tollfree, L. (1999). South East London English: discrete versus continuous modelling of consonantal reduction. In Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (eds.), Urban Voices, 163–184. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Torgersen, E. (1997). Some Phonological Innovations in Southeastern British English. CandPhilol thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Torgersen, E. & Kerswill, P. (2004). Internal and external motivation in phonetic change: dialect levelling outcomes for an English vowel shift. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8, 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torgersen, E., Kerswill, P., Fox, S. & Cheshire, J. (2006). Endogenous linguistic change in inner-London teenage speech as the generator of innovations: implications for models of innovation, levelling and diffusion. Presented at University College London, March 2006. http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/projects/linguistics/innovators/documents/UCL_poster_000.pdf (accessed 14 september 2007).Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (2004). New-Dialect Formation: The Inevitability Of Colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Watt, D. & Fabricius, A. H. (2002). Evaluation of a technique for improving the mapping of multiple speakers’ vowel spaces in the F1~F2 plane. Leeds Working Papers in Linguistics 9, 159–173.Google Scholar
Watt, D. & Tillotson, J. (2001). A spectrographic analysis of vowel fronting in Bradford English. English World-Wide 22, 269–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1962). A Study of the Formants of the Pure Vowels of British English. MA thesis, University of London. http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/home/wells/formants/index.htm (accessed 31 August 2006).Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English, vol. 1: An Introduction; vol. 2: The British Isles; vol. 3: Beyond the British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1990). A phonetic update on RP. Moderna Språk 82, 3–9.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1997). What's happening to Received Pronunciation? English Phonetics (English Phonetic Society of Japan) 1, 13–23.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (2000). Longman Pronunciation Dictionary. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Zwicker, E. (1961). Subdivision of the audible frequency range into critical bands (Frequenzgruppen). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 33, 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar