Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:04:52.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

(Non-)retroflex Slavic affricates and their motivation: Evidence from Czech and Polish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2012

Marzena Żygis ,
Daniel Pape  and
Luis M. T. Jesus
Marzena Żygis
Affiliation:
Zentrum für Allgemeine SprachwissenschaftBerlin, [email protected]
Daniel Pape
Affiliation:
Institute of Electronics and Telematics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA)University of AveiroAveiro, [email protected]
Luis M. T. Jesus
Affiliation:
Institute of Electronics and Telematics Engineering of Aveiro (IEETA) and School of Health Sciences (ESSUA)University of AveiroAveiro, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Slavic affricate represented by /č/ is tacitly or explicitly assumed to be // for all Slavic languages. In this paper we revise the affricate inventories of Polish and Czech, showing that the symbol /č/ stands for two different sounds: the palatoalveolar // in Czech and the retroflex // in Polish. This conclusion is supported by acoustic results for Polish and Czech data. The fact that COG (centre of gravity) values of frication are not significantly different for Polish and Czech /č/ appears a bit surprising especially in light of the fact that COG is generally seen as a parameter contributing to the distinction of fricatives (including sibilants, see e.g. Gordon, Barthmaier & Sands 2002). Our results show that other parameters such as duration of the frication phase, F1 and F2 of the following vowel as well as spectral slopes are more reliable cues for distinguishing the small differences between affricates examined here.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , December 2012 , pp. 281 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benni, Tytus. 1931. Palatogramy polskie. Kraków: Gebethner i Wolff.Google Scholar
Biedrzycki, Leszek. 1974. Abriß der polnischen Phonetik. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.Google Scholar
Blacklock, Oliver. 2004. Characteristics of variation in production of normal and disordered fricatives, using reduced-variance spectral methods. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hamann, Silke. 2008. The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25 (2), 217–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2011. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 5.2.45. http://www.praat.org/, retrieved 28 September 2011.Google Scholar
Borovičková, Blanka & Maláč, Vladislav. 1967. The spectral analysis of Czech sound combinations. Praha: Academia Nakladatelství Československé Akademie Věd.Google Scholar
Bray, Reginald George Arthur de. 1951. Guide to the Slavonic languages. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Corbett, Greville G. (eds.). 1993. The Slavonic languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dankovičová, Jana 1997. Czech. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 27, 77–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogil, Grzegorz & Jessen, Michael. 1989. Phonologie in der Nähe Phonetik. Die Affrikaten im Polnischen und Deutschen. In Prinzhorn, Martin (ed.), Phonologie, 223–279. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukiewicz, Leokadia & Sawicka, Irena. 1995. Fonetyka i fonologia. Kraków: Instytut Języka Polskiego PAN.Google Scholar
Evers, Vincent, Reetz, Henning & Lahiri, Aditi. 1998. Crosslinguistic acoustic categorization of sibilants independent of phonological status. Journal of Phonetics 26, 345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Edward S. 1995/2002. Auditory representations in phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA. [Published 2002, New York: Routledge.]Google Scholar
Forrest, Karen, Weismer, Gary, Milenkovic, Paul & Dougall, Ronald N.. 1988. Statistical analysis of word-initial voiceless obstruents: Preliminary data. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84 (1), 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Barthmaier, Paul & Sands, Kathy. 2002. A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32, 141–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussmann, Edmund. 1980. Studies in abstract phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hála, Bohuslav. 1962. Uvedení do fonetiky češtiny na obecně fonetickém základě. Praha: Československá Akademie Věd.Google Scholar
Hall, Tracy A. 1997a. The historical development of retroflex consonants in Indo-Aryan. Lingua 101, 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Tracy A. 1997b. The phonology of coronals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Silke. 2003. The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Hamann, Silke. 2004. Retroflex fricatives in Slavic languages. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34, 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Philip J. 1996. Phonetic constraints and markedness in the phonotactics of Australian aboriginal languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor. 1979. Classification of fricative spectra using statistical discriminant functions. In Lindblom, Björn & Öhman, Sven (eds.), Frontiers of speech communication research, 77–91. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jassem, Wiktor. 2003. Polish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 3, 103–107.Google Scholar
Jesus, Luis M. T. & Shadle, Christine H.. 2002. A parametric study of the spectral characteristics of European Portuguese fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 30 (3), 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1991. Coronal places of articulation. In Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-François (eds.), Phonetics and phonology: The special status of coronals, 29–48. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia A. 1993. Phonetic representation of palatalization versus fronting. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 85, 6–21.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei & Lobanova, Alevtina. 2007. Komi-Permyak coronal obstruents: Acoustic contrasts and positional variation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37, 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koneczna, Halina & Zawadowski, Witold. 1956. Obrazy rentgenograficzne głosek rosyjskich. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 1997. Linguistic phonetic descriptions. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 559–618. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Bhaskararao, Peri. 1983. Non-quantal aspects of consonant production: A study of retroflex consonants. Journal of Phonetics 11, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Wu, Zongji. 1984. Places of articulation: An investigation of Pekingese fricatives and affricates. Journal of Phonetics 12, 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamprecht, Arnošt, Šlosar, Dušan & Bauer, Jaroslav. 1977. Historický vývoj Češtiny. Praha: Soukromé Pedagogické Nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Lehr-Spławiński, Tadeusz & Stieber, Zdzisław. 1957. Gramatyka historyczna języka czeskiego. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Lousada, Marisa, Jesus, Luis M. T. & Pape, Daniel. 2012. Estimation of stops’ spectral place cues using multitaper techniques. D.E.L.T.A. 28 (1), 1–26.Google Scholar
MathWorks, . 2007. Signal Processing Toolbox 6 User's Guide. Natick: MathWorks.Google Scholar
Miller-Ockhuizen, Amanda & Zec, Draga. 2003. Acoustics of contrastive palatal affricates predict phonological patterning. In Solé, Maria-Josep, Recasens, Daniel & Romero, Joaquin (eds.), The 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 15), Barcelona, 3101–3104.Google Scholar
Ostaszewska, Danuta & Tambor, Jolanta. 2001. Fonetyka i fonologia współczesnego języka polskiego. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye & Żygis, Marzena. 2007. The evolution of sibilants in Polish and Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 15 (2), 291–324.Google Scholar
Palková, Zdena. 1994. Fonetika a fonologie češtiny. Praha: Univerzita Karlova.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2010. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/, version 2.14.1, retrieved 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Rochoń [Żygis], Marzena & Pompino-Marschall, Bernd. 1999. The articulation of secondarily palatalized coronals in Polish. The 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 14), San Francisco, CA, 1897–1900.Google Scholar
Rospond, Stanisław. 1971. Gramatyka historyczna języka polskiego. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy. 1984. Cyclic and lexical phonology: The structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadle, Christine. 1991. The effect of geometry on source mechanisms of fricative consonants. Journal of Phonetics 19, 409–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shadle, Christine H. & Mair, Sheila J.. 1996. Quantifying spectral characteristics of fricatives. The International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 96), Philadelphia, PA, 1517–1520.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. & Blumstein, Sheila E.. 1975. Quantal aspects of consonant production and perception: A study of retroflex stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics 3, 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N., Li, Zhiqiang, Lee, Chao-Yang & Keyser, Samuel J. 2004. A note on Mandarin fricatives and enhancement. In Fant, Gunnar, Fujisaki, Hiroya, Cao, Jianfen & Xu, Yi (eds.), Foreign language teaching and research press, 393–403. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Stieber, Zdzisław. 1962. Rozwój fonologiczny języka polskiego. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Stieber, Zdzisław. 1969. Zarys gramatyki porównawczej języków słowiańskich: Fonologia. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Styczek, Irena. 1973. Badania eksperymentalne spirantów polskich s, š, ś ze stanowiska fizjologii i patologii mowy (Prace Językoznawcze 69). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Szpyra, Jolanta 1995. Three tiers in Polish and English phonology. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.Google Scholar
Toda, Martine, Maeda, Shinji & Honda, Kiyoshi. 2010. Formant cavity affiliation in sibilant fricatives. In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine & Żygis, Marzena (eds.), Turbulent sounds: An interdisciplinary guide, 343–374. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzchowska, Bożena. 1971. Wymowa polska. Warszawa: Państwowe Zakłady Wydawnictw Szkolnych.Google Scholar
Wierzchowska, Bożena. 1980. Fonetyka i fonologia języka polskiego. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Żygis, Marzena. 2003. Phonetic and phonological aspects of Slavic sibilant fricatives. In Hall, Tracy A. & Hamann, Silke (eds.), ZAS Papers in Linguistics 32, 175–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Żygis, Marzena. 2006. Contrast optimization in Slavic sibilant systems. Habilitationsschrift, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.Google Scholar
Żygis, Marzena & Padgett, Jaye. 2010. A perceptual study of Polish sibilants, and its implications for historical sound change. Journal of Phonetics 38 (2), 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar