Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:08:59.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Formants of Monophthong Vowels in Standard Southern British English Pronunciation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

David Deterding
David Deterding
Affiliation:
National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, 469 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore259756 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The formants of the eleven monophthong vowels of Standard Southern British (SSB) pronunciation of English were measured for five male and five female BBC broadcasters whose speech was included in the MARSEC database. The measurements were made using linear-prediction-based formant tracks overlaid on digital spectrograms for an average of ten instances of each vowel for each speaker. These measurements were taken from connected speech, allowing comparison with previous formant values measured from citation words. It was found that the male vowels were significantly less peripheral in the measurements from connected speech than in measurements from citation words.

Type
Research Notes
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 27 , Issue 1-2 , June 1997 , pp. 47 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cruttenden, A. (1994). Gimson's pronunciation of English. Fifth edition of Gimson, A.C. (1962). An introduction to the pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Deterding, D. (1990). Speaker Normalization for Automatic Speech Recognition. Ph.D. Thesis, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Gimson, A.C. & Ramsaran, S. (1989). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English (Fourth edition). London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Kent, R.D. & Read, C. (1992). The Acoustic Analysis of Speech. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1996). Elements of Acoustic Phonetics. Chicago (Second edition). University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Maddieson, I. (1990). Vowels of the world's languages. Journal of Phonetics 18, 93–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1983). Economy of speech gestures. In MacNeilage, P.F. (editor), The Production of Speech. New York: Springer-Verlag, 217–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, P., Knowles, G., Varadi, T. & Arnfield, S. (1993). Marsec: A machine-readable spoken English corpus. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traunmüller, H. (1981). Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69(5), 1465–1475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwicker, E. & Terhardt, E. (1980). Analytical expression for critical-band rate and critical bandwidth as a function of frequency. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68(5), 1523–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar