Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:08:07.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Novel Psychomotor Tasks in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2016

Maria A. Rossetti ,
Irene Piryatinsky ,
Fayeza S. Ahmed ,
Petra M. Klinge ,
Norman R. Relkin ,
Stephen Salloway ,
Lisa D. Ravdin ,
Einat Brenner ,
Paul F. Malloy  and
Bonnie E. Levin
...Show all authors
Maria A. Rossetti
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas
Irene Piryatinsky
Affiliation:
Memory and Aging Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Fayeza S. Ahmed
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Eastern Illinois University, Charleston, Illinois Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
Petra M. Klinge
Affiliation:
Memory and Aging Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Norman R. Relkin
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
Stephen Salloway
Affiliation:
Memory and Aging Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Lisa D. Ravdin
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
Einat Brenner
Affiliation:
Memory and Aging Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Paul F. Malloy
Affiliation:
Memory and Aging Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Bonnie E. Levin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
Michael Broggi
Affiliation:
Memory and Aging Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
Rebecca Gavett
Affiliation:
Memory and Aging Program, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
James S. Maniscalco
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York Department of Psychology, CUNY Queens College, Flushing, New York Department of Psychology, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, New York
Heather Katzen*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Heather Katzen, Department of Neurology, University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, 1120 NW 14th Street, 13th Floor, Miami, FL 33136. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a neurological disorder presenting with gait, cognitive, and bladder symptoms in the context of ventricular enlargement. Although gait is the primary indicator for treatment candidacy and outcome, additional monitoring tools are needed. Line Tracing Test (LTT) and Serial Dotting Test (SDT), two psychomotor tasks, have been introduced as potential outcome measures but have not been widely studied. This preliminary study examined whether LTT and SDT are sensitive to motor dysfunction in INPH and determined if accuracy and time are important aspects of performance. Methods: Eighty-four INPH subjects and 36 healthy older adults were administered LTT and SDT. Novel error scoring procedures were developed to make scoring practical and efficient; interclass correlation showed good reliability of scoring procedures for both tasks (0.997; p<.001). Results: The INPH group demonstrated slower performance on SDT (p<.001) and made a greater number of errors on both tasks (p<.001). Combined Time/Error scores revealed poorer performance in the INPH group for original-LTT (p<.001), modified-LTT (p≤.001) and SDT (p<.001). Conclusions: These findings indicate LTT and SDT may prove useful for monitoring psychomotor skills in INPH. While completion time reflects impaired processing speed, reduced accuracy may suggest planning and self-monitoring difficulties, aspects of executive functioning known to be compromised in INPH. This is the first study to underscore the importance of performance accuracy in INPH and introduce practical/reliable error scoring for these tasks. Future work will establish reliability and validity of these measures and determine their utility as outcome tools. (JINS, 2016, 22, 341–349)

Keywords

Normal pressure hydrocephalusCognitionDementiaNeuropsychologySpeed of processingPsychomotor speed
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , March 2016 , pp. 341 - 349
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R.D., Fisher, C.M., Hakim, S., Ojemann, R.G., & Sweet, W.H. (1965). Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: A treatable syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine, 273(3), 117–126.Google Scholar
Bergsneider, M., Black, P.M., Klinge, P., Marmarou, A., & Relkin, N. (2005). Surgical management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery, 57(3), S2–S29.Google Scholar
Biller, J., & Ferro, J.M. (2014). Portosystemic encephalopathy. Neurologic aspects of systemic disease part II: Handbook of clinical neurology (Vol. 120, p 661). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Devito, E.E., Pickard, J.D., Salmond, C.H., Iddon, J.L., Loveday, C., & Sahakian, B.J. (2005). The neuropsychology of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). British Journal of Neurosurgery, 19(3), 217–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.Google Scholar
Foss, T., Eide, P.K., & Finset, A. (2006). Intracranial pressure parameters in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients with or without improvement of cognitive function after shunt treatment. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 23(1), 47–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellström, P., Edsbagge, M., Blomsterwall, E., Archer, T., Tisell, M., Tullberg, M., & Wikkelsø, C. (2008). Neuropsychological effects of shunt treatment in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery, 63(3), 527–536.Google Scholar
Iddon, J.L., Pickard, J.D., Cross, J.J.L., Griffiths, P.D., Czosnyka, M., & Sahakian, B.J. (1999). Specific patterns of cognitive impairment in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer’s disease: A pilot study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 67(6), 723–732.Google Scholar
Kahlon, B., Sjunnesson, J., & Rehncrona, S. (2007). Long‐term outcome in patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery, 60(2), 327–332.Google Scholar
Katzen, H., Ravdin, L. D., Assuras, S., Heros, R., Kaplitt, M., Schwartz, T.H., & Relkin, N.R. (2011). Postshunt cognitive and functional improvement in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery, 68(2), 416.Google Scholar
Kitagaki, H., Mori, E., Ishii, K., Yamaji, S., Hirono, N., & Imamura, T. (1998). CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: Morphology and volumetry. AJNR American Journal of Neuroradiology, 19(7), 1277–1284.Google Scholar
Klinge, P., Rückert, N., Weißenborn, K., Dörner, L., Samii, M., & Brinker, T. (2001). A practical neuropsychological test battery for measurement of cognitive and motor function in patients with Normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Poster presented at the Third International Hydrocephalus Workshop, Kos, Greece.Google Scholar
Klinge, P., Rückert, N., Schuhmann, M., Dörner, L., Brinker, T., & Samii, M. (2002). Neuropsychological testing to improve surgical management of patients with chronic hydrocephalus after shunt treatment (pp. 51–53). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
Marmarou, A., Bergsneider, M., Klinge, P., Relkin, N., & Black, P.M. (2005). The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery, 57(3), S2–S17.Google Scholar
McGirt, M.J., Woodworth, G., Coon, A.L., Thomas, G., Williams, M.A., & Rigamonti, D. (2005). Diagnosis, treatment, and analysis of long-term outcomes in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery, 57(4), 699–705.Google Scholar
Pujari, S., Kharkar, S., Metellus, P., Shuck, J., Williams, M.A., & Rigamonti, D. (2008). Normal pressure hydrocephalus: Long-term outcome after shunt surgery. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 79(11), 1282–1286.Google Scholar
Savolainen, S., Hurskainen, H., Paljärvi, L., Alafuzoff, I., & Vapalahti, M. (2002). Five-year outcome of normal pressure hydrocephalus with or without a shunt: Predictive value of the clinical signs, neuropsychological evaluation and infusion test. Acta Neurochirurgica, 144(6), 515–523.Google Scholar
Schomerus, H., Weissenborn, K., Hamster, W., Rückert, N., & Hecker, H. (1999). PSE syndrome test manual. Frankfurt: Swets Test Services.Google Scholar
Shprecher, D., Schwalb, J., & Kurlan, R. (2008). Normal pressure hydrocephalus: Diagnosis and treatment. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports, 8(5), 371–376.Google Scholar
Solana, E., Sahuquillo, J., Junqué, C., Quintana, M., & Poca, M.A. (2012). Cognitive disturbances and neuropsychological changes after surgical treatment in a cohort of 185 patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(3), 304–317.Google Scholar
Thomas, G., McGirt, M.J., Woodworth, G., Heidler, J., Rigamonti, D., Hillis, A.E., & Williams, M.A. (2005). Baseline neuropsychological profile and cognitive response to cerebrospinal fluid shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 20(2-3), 163–168.Google Scholar
Tsakanikas, D., Katzen, H., Ravdin, L.D., & Relkin, N.R. (2009). Upper extremity motor measures of Tap Test response in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 111(9), 752–757.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, K. (2013). Psychometric tests for diagnosing minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Metabolic Brain Disease, 28(2), 227–229.Google Scholar
Weissenborn, K., Ennen, J.C., Schomerus, H., Rückert, N., & Hecker, H. (2001). Neuropsychological characterization of hepatic encephalopathy. Journal of Hepatology, 34(5), 768–773.Google Scholar