Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:03:11.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preliminary Evidence for a Sex-Specific Relationship between Amount of Cannabis Use and Neurocognitive Performance in Young Adult Cannabis Users

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2013

Natania A. Crane
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Randi Melissa Schuster
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
Raul Gonzalez*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Raul Gonzalez, 11200 S.W. 8th Street Miami, FL 33199. E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests neuropsychological deficits from cannabis use, with a burgeoning area of preclinical research indicating possible sex-differences. However, few studies have examined how cannabis use may differentially impact neurocognition in male and female cannabis users. As such, we examined potential sex-differences in associations between amount of cannabis use (across several time frames) and neurocognitive performance among young adult regular cannabis users. Consistent with previous studies, more cannabis use was generally associated with poorer episodic memory and decision-making, but not other measures of inhibitory control. However, patterns of results suggested sex-specific dissociations. In particular, more cannabis use was more consistently associated with poorer episodic memory performance in females than males. Conversely, more cannabis use was associated with poorer decision-making performance for males, but not females. These results provide further evidence for residual cannabis-associated neurocognitive deficits and suggest the importance of examining the impact of cannabis on neurocognition separately for males and females. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–7)

Type
Brief Communication
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., Anderson, S.W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, R.H.B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., Brandt, J. (1998). Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised: Normative data and analysis of inter-form and test-retest reliability. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 4355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolla, K.I., Brown, K., Eldreth, D., Tate, K., Cadet, J.L. (2002). Dose-related neurocognitive effects of marijuana use. Neurology, 59, 13371343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolla, K.I., Eldreth, D.A., Matochik, J.A., Cadet, J.L. (2005). Neural substrates of faulty decision-making in abstinent marijuana users. Neuroimage, 26, 480492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bornovalova, M.A., Cashman-Rolls, A., O'Donnell, J.M., Ettinger, K., Richards, J.B., deWit, H., Lejeuz, C.W. (2009). Risk taking differences on a behavioral task as a function of potential reward/loss magnitude and individual differences in impulsivity and sensation seeking. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 93, 258262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burston, J.J., Wiley, J.L., Craig, A.A., Selley, D.E., Sim-Selley, L.J. (2010). Regional enhancement of cannabinoid CB#8321; receptor desensitization in female adolescent rats following repeated Delta-tetrahydrocannabinol exposure. British Journal of Pharmacology, 161, 103112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crane, N.A., Schuster, R.M., Fusar-Poli, P., Gonzalez, R. (2013). Effects of cannabis on neurocognitive functioning: Recent advances, neurodevelopmental influences, and sex differences. Neuropsychology Review, 23, 117137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cunha, P.J., Nicastri, S., de Andrade, A.G., Bolla, K.I. (2010). The frontal assessment battery (FAB) reveals neurocognitive dysfunction in substance-dependent individuals in distinct executive domains: Abstract reasoning, motor programming, and cognitive flexibility. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 875881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dougherty, D.M., Mathias, C.W., Marsh, D.M., Jagar, A.A. (2005). Laboratory behavioral measures of impulsivity. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 8290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillies, G.E., McArthur, S. (2010). Estrogen actions in the brain and the basis for differential action in men and women: A case for sex-specific medicines. Pharmacological Reviews, 62, 155198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzalez, R., Schuster, R.M., Mermelstein, R.J., Vassileva, J., Martin, E.M., Diviak, K.R. (2012). Performance of young adult cannabis users on neurocognitive measures of impulsive behavior and their relationship to symptoms of cannabis use disorders. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 962976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grant, J.E., Chamberlain, S.R., Schreiber, L., Odlaug, B.L. (2012). Neuropsychological deficits associated with cannabis use in young adults. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 121, 159162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanson, K.L., Winward, J.L., Schweinsburg, A.D., Medina, K.L., Brown, S.A., Tapert, S.F. (2010). Longitudinal study of cognition among adolescent marijuana users over three weeks of abstinence. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 970976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M.W., Bickel, W.K. (2002). Within-subject comparison of real and hypothetical money rewards in delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 77, 129146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., Schulenberg, J.E. (2012). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings (pp. 78). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Kirby, K.N., Petry, N.M., Bickel, W.K. (1999). Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 7887.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejuez, C.W., Read, J.P., Kahler, C.W., Richards, J.B., Ramsey, S.E., Stuart, G.L., Brown, R.A. (2002). Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 7584.Google ScholarPubMed
Lisdahl, K.M., Price, J.S. (2012). Increased marijuana use and gender predict poorer cognitive functioning in adolescents and emerging adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 678688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McQueeny, T., Padula, C.B., Price, J., Medina, K.L., Logan, P., Tapert, S.F. (2011). Gender effects on amygdala morphometry in adolescent marijuana users. Behavioural Brain Research, 224, 128134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Medina, K.L., McQueeny, T., Nagel, B.J., Hanson, K.L., Yang, T.T., Tapert, S.F. (2009). Prefrontal cortex morphometry in abstinent adolescent marijuana users: Subtle gender effects. Addition Biology, 14, 457468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moeller, F.G., Barratt, E.S., Dougherty, D.M., Schmitz, J.M., Swann, A.C. (2001). Psychiatric aspects of impulsivity. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 17831793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narimatsu, S., Watanabe, K., Yamamoto, I., Yoshimura, H. (1991). Sex difference in the oxidative metabolism of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in the rat. Biochemical Pharmacology, 41, 11871194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pigott, T.A., Walker, M.H., Teitelbaum, S.A., Lu, C. (2009). Sex differences and neurotransmitter systems in addiction. In K.T. Brady S.E. Back & S.F. Greenfield (Eds.), Women and addiction: A comprehensive textbook (pp. 99117). New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Pope, H.G. Jr., Gruber, A.J., Hudson, J.I., Huestis, M.A., Yurgelun-Todd, D. (2001). Neuropsychological performance in long-term cannabis users. Archives of General Psychiatry, 58, 909915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pope, H.G. Jr., Jacobs, A., Mialet, J.P., Yurgelun-Todd, D., Gruber, S. (1997). Evidence for a sex-specific residual effect of cannabis on visuospatial memory. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 66, 179184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pope, H.G. Jr., Yurgelun-Todd, D. (1996). The residual cognitive effects of heavy marijuana use in college students. Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 521527.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solowij, N., Jones, K.A., Rozman, M.E., Davis, S.M., Ciarrochi, J., Heaven, P.C., Yucel, M. (2011). Verbal learning and memory in adolescent cannabis users, alcohol users and non-users. Psychopharmacology (Berl), 216, 131144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Solowij, N., Stephens, R.S., Roffman, R.A., Babor, T., Kadden, R., Miller, M., Vendetti, J. (2002). Cognitive functioning of long-term heavy cannabis users seeking treatment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 11231131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tait, R.J., Mackinnon, A., Christensen, H. (2011). Cannabis use and cognitive function: 8-year trajectory in a young adult cohort. Addiction, 106, 21952203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdejo-Garcia, A., Benbrook, A., Funderburk, F., David, P., Cadet, J.L., Bolla, K.I. (2007). The differential relationship between cocaine use and marijuana use on decision-making performance over repeat testing with the Iowa Gambling Task. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, 211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, D., Becker, B., Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, E., Daumann, J. (2010). Interactions between specific parameters of cannabis use and verbal memory. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 34, 871876.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wesley, M.J., Hanlon, C.A., Porrino, L.J. (2011). Poor decision-making by chronic marijuana users is associated with decreased functional responsiveness to negative consequences. Psychiatry Research, 191, 5159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitlow, C.T., Liguori, A., Livengood, L.B., Hart, S.L., Mussat-Whitlow, B.J., Lamborn, C.M., Porrino, L.J. (2004). Long-term heavy marijuana users make costly decisions on a gambling task. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 76, 107111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed