Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:31:30.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postural knowledge of transitive pantomimes and intransitive gestures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2002

MARIA MOZAZ
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Neurology Service, Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad del Pals Vasco, San Sebastian, Spain
LESLIE J. GONZALEZ ROTHI
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Neurology Service, Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida
JEFFREY M. ANDERSON
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Neurology Service, Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida
GREGORY P. CRUCIAN
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Neurology Service, Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida
KENNETH M. HEILMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Neurology Service, Malcom Randall Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida

Abstract

Patients with apraxia are more impaired when performing transitive pantomimes than intransitive gestures. This dissociation might be related to the differences in movement complexity. Alternatively, the programs for intransitive gestures might be better defined, more widely distributed, or easier to activate than are those for transitive pantomimes. The purpose of this study was to test the complexity versus representational hypotheses. Twenty right-handed normal subjects both performed and discriminated correct from incorrect transitive pantomimes and intransitive gestures. The discrimination was performed by having subjects point at illustrations of hand postures. The subjects performed better when discriminating postures than when performing gestures or pantomimes. On both the production and discrimination tests, subjects performed better with intransitive gestures than transitive pantomimes. Although the finding that even normal subjects had more difficulty performing transitive pantomimes than intransitive gestures might appear to support the complexity hypothesis, that subjects also had more difficulty discriminating transitive than intransitive postures supports the representational activation hypothesis. (JINS, 2002, 8, 958–963.)

Type
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Copyright
© 2002 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)