Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:30:02.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Perceptual and premotor components of unilateral auditory neglect

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Roberto Sterzi
Affiliation:
Divisione Neurologia, Ospedale Niguarda, Milano, Italy
Sylvie Piacentini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Torino, Italy
Mario Polimeni
Affiliation:
Divisione Neurologia, Ospedale Niguarda, Milano, Italy
Francesco Liverani
Affiliation:
Istituto Pio Albergo Trivulzio, Milano, Italy
Edoardo Bisiach
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università di Torino, Italy

Abstract

Recent investigations have distinguished between ophthalmokinetic and melokinetic factors of unilateral neglect. The aim of our study was to investigate the possible dissociation between melokinetic (premotor) and perceptual factors, avoiding any overt oculokinctic components. We asked four blindfolded left neglect patients to set a dichotic sound in central position, by moving a handle controlling the difference of intensity between the sounds delivered to the left and to the right cars. Two conflicting conditions were used. In the congruent condition, the sound moved in the same direction as the hand movement; in the noncongruent condition, it moved in the opposite direction. One patient performed as if suffering from melokinetic neglect, and another as if suffering from perceptual neglect. The behavior of the other two subjects did not lend itself to a clearcut interpretation. (JINS, 1996, 2, 419–425.)

Type
Thematic Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, M.L. (1973). A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 23, 658664.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisiach, E., Cornacchia, L., Sterzi, R., & Vallar, G. (1984). Disorders of perceived auditory lateralization after lesions of the right hemisphere. Brain, 107, 3752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisiach, E., Geminiani, G., Bert, A., & Rusconi, M.L. (1990). Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect. Neurology, 40, 12781281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bisiach, E., Tegnér, R., Làdavas, E., Rusconi, M.L., Mijovic’, D., & Hjaltason, H. (1995). Dissociation of ophlhalmokinelie an melokinetic attention in unilateral neglect. Cerebral Cortex, 5, 439447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castaigne, P., Laplane, D.. & Degos, J.D. (1970). Trois cas de négligence motrice par lésion rétro-rolandique. RevueNeurologique. 122, 233242.Google Scholar
Diller, L. & Weinberg, J. (1977). Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation. The evolution of a rational remediation program. In Weinstein, E.A. & Friedland, R.P. (Eds.), Hemi-inattention and hemisphere specialization. Advances in neurology, Vol. 18 (pp. 6282). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Folstein, M.P., Folstein, S.E., & MeHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.Google ScholarPubMed
Heilman, K.M., Bowers, D., Coslett, H.B., Whelan, H., & Watson, R.T. (1985). Directional hypokinesia: Prolonged reaction times for leftward movements in patients with right hemisphere lesions and neglect. Neurology, 35, 855859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesulam, M.M. (1981). A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Annals of Neurology, 10, 309325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tégner, R. & Levander, M. (1991). Through a looking glass: A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. Brain, 114, 19431951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar