Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T05:17:39.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Now I see it, now I don’t”: Determining Threshold Levels of Facial Emotion Recognition for Use in Patient Populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Isabelle Chiu ,
Regina I. Gfrörer ,
Olivier Piguet ,
Manfred Berres ,
Andreas U. Monsch  and
Marc Sollberger
Isabelle Chiu
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland Memory Clinic, University Center for Medicine of Aging Basel, Felix Platter-Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Regina I. Gfrörer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Olivier Piguet
Affiliation:
Neuroscience Research Australia, and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and Its Disorders, Sydney, Australia
Manfred Berres
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Technology, University of Applied Sciences Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
Andreas U. Monsch
Affiliation:
Memory Clinic, University Center for Medicine of Aging Basel, Felix Platter-Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
Marc Sollberger*
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland Memory Clinic, University Center for Medicine of Aging Basel, Felix Platter-Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Marc Sollberger, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Schanzenstrasse 55, 4031 Basel, Switzerland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The importance of including measures of emotion processing, such as tests of facial emotion recognition (FER), as part of a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment is being increasingly recognized. In clinical settings, FER tests need to be sensitive, short, and easy to administer, given the limited time available and patient limitations. Current tests, however, commonly use stimuli that either display prototypical emotions, bearing the risk of ceiling effects and unequal task difficulty, or are cognitively too demanding and time-consuming. To overcome these limitations in FER testing in patient populations, we aimed to define FER threshold levels for the six basic emotions in healthy individuals. Forty-nine healthy individuals between 52 and 79 years of age were asked to identify the six basic emotions at different intensity levels (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%, and 125% of the prototypical emotion). Analyses uncovered differing threshold levels across emotions and sex of facial stimuli, ranging from 50% up to 100% intensities. Using these findings as “healthy population benchmarks”, we propose to apply these threshold levels to clinical populations either as facial emotion recognition or intensity rating tasks. As part of any comprehensive social cognition test battery, this approach should allow for a rapid and sensitive assessment of potential FER deficits. (JINS, 2015, 21, 568–572)

Keywords

ThresholdEmotion recognitionFacial expressionBasic emotionsFace morphingNeuropsychological disorder
Type
Brief Communication
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 21 , Supplement 7 , August 2015 , pp. 568 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W.V. (1978). Facial Action Coding System: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state.” A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.Google Scholar
Funkiewiez, A., Bertoux, M., de Souza, L.C., Levy, R., & Dubois, B. (2012). The SEA (Social cognition and Emotional Assessment): A clinical neuropsychological tool for early diagnosis of frontal variant of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropsychology, 26(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isaacowitz, D.M., Lockenhoff, C.E., Lane, R.D., Wright, R., Sechrest, L., Riedel, R., & Costa, P.T. (2007). Age differences in recognition of emotion in lexical stimuli and facial expressions. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 147–159.Google Scholar
Kring, A.M., & Elis, O. (2013). Emotion deficits in people with schizophrenia. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 409–433.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(3), 219–238.Google Scholar
Mill, A., Allik, J., Realo, A., & Valk, R. (2009). Age-related differences in emotion recognition ability: A cross-sectional study. Emotion, 9(5), 619–630.Google Scholar
Miller, L.A., Hsieh, S., Lah, S., Savage, S., Hodges, J.R., & Piguet, O. (2012). One size does not fit all: Face emotion processing impairments in semantic dementia, behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease are mediated by distinct cognitive deficits. Behavioural Neurology, 25(1), 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montagne, B., Kessels, R.P., De Haan, E.H., & Perrett, D.I. (2007). The Emotion Recognition Task: A paradigm to measure the perception of facial emotional expressions at different intensities. Perceptual Motor Skills, 104(2), 589–598.Google Scholar
Naranjo, C., Kornreich, C., Campanella, S., Noel, X., Vandriette, Y., Gillain, B., & Constant, E. (2011). Major depression is associated with impaired processing of emotion in music as well as in facial and vocal stimuli. Journal of Affective Disorders, 128(3), 243–251.Google Scholar
Piguet, O., Hornberger, M., Mioshi, E., & Hodges, J.R. (2011). Behavioural-variant frontotemporal dementia: Diagnosis, clinical staging, and management. The Lancet Neurology, 10(2), 162–172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapcsak, S.Z., Galper, S.R., Comer, J.F., Reminger, S.L., Nielsen, L., Kaszniak, A.W., & Cohen, R.A. (2000). Fear recognition deficits after focal brain damage: A cautionary note. Neurology, 54(3), 575–581.Google Scholar
Sheikh, J.I., & Yesavage, J.A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontologist, 5(1-2), 165–173.Google Scholar
Suzuki, A., Hoshino, T., & Shigemasu, K. (2006). Measuring individual differences in sensitivities to basic emotions in faces. Cognition, 99(3), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, A., Hoshino, T., Shigemasu, K., & Kawamura, M. (2007). Decline or improvement? Age-related differences in facial expression recognition. Biological Psychology, 74(1), 75–84.Google Scholar
Thalmann, B., Spiegel, R., Stähelin, H.B., Brubacher, D., Ermini-Fünfschilling, D., Bläsi, S., & Monsch, A.U. (2002). Dementia screening in general practice: Optimised scoring for the Clock Drawing Test. Brain Aging, 2(2), 36–43.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, O., Hildebrandt, A., Manske, K., Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2014). Test battery for measuring the perception and recognition of facial expressions of emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 404.Google Scholar
Young, A., Perrett, D., Calder, A., Sprengelmeyer, R., & Ekman, P. (2002). Facial Expressions of Emotion – Stimuli and Tests (FEEST). Bury St Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Chiu supplementary material S1

Supplementary Figure

Download Chiu supplementary material S1(File)
File 471.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Chiu supplementary material S2

Supplementary Figure

Download Chiu supplementary material S2(File)
File 465.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Chiu supplementary material S3

Chiu supplementary material

Download Chiu supplementary material S3(File)
File 16.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Chiu supplementary material S4

Supplementary Material Table

Download Chiu supplementary material S4(File)
File 44.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Chiu supplementary material S5

Supplementary Table

Download Chiu supplementary material S5(File)
File 25.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Chiu supplementary material S6

Supplementary Table

Download Chiu supplementary material S6(File)
File 33.6 KB