Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:31:28.696Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is the Prefrontal Cortex Necessary for Delay Task Performance? Evidence from Lesion and fMRI Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2006

MARK D'ESPOSITO ,
JEFFREY W. COONEY ,
ADAM GAZZALEY ,
SASHA E.B. GIBBS  and
BRADLEY R. POSTLE
MARK D'ESPOSITO
Affiliation:
Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California
JEFFREY W. COONEY
Affiliation:
Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California
ADAM GAZZALEY
Affiliation:
Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California
SASHA E.B. GIBBS
Affiliation:
Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California
BRADLEY R. POSTLE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the prefrontal cortex (PFC) is consistently found to be associated with various working memory processes, the necessity of the PFC for such processes remains unclear. To elucidate PFC contributions to storage and rehearsal/maintenance processes engaged during verbal working memory function, we assessed behavior of patients with lesions to the left or right lateral PFC, and neural activity of healthy young subjects during fMRI scanning, during performance of working memory tasks. We found that PFC lesions did not affect storage processes—which is consistent with the notion that posterior cortical networks can support simple retention of information. We also found that PFC lesions did not affect rehearsal/maintenance processes, which was in contrast to our finding that healthy subjects performing a verbal delayed recognition task showed bilateral PFC activation. These combined imaging and behavioral data suggest that working memory rehearsal/maintenance processes may depend on both hemispheres, which may have implications for recovery of function and development of rehabilitation therapies after frontal injury. (JINS, 2006, 12, 248–260.)

Keywords

Short-term memoryDelayed-recall taskDelayed-recognition taskFrontal lobeCognitionStrokefMRI
Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , March 2006 , pp. 248 - 260
Copyright
© 2006 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alajouanine, T. (1960). Les grandes activites du lobe occipital. Paris: Masson.
Awh, E., Jonides, J., Smith, E.E., Schumacher, E.H., Koeppe, R.A., & Katz, S. (1996). Dissociation of storage and rehearsal in verbal working memory: Evidence from PET. Psychological Science, 7, 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Baddeley, A.D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Beck, A., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erlbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brozoski, T.J., Brown, R.M., Rosvold, H.E., & Goldman, P.S. (1979). Cognitive deficit caused by regional depletion of dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rhesus monkey. Science, 205, 929–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: The HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging, 17, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, L. & Knight, R. (1998). Contribution of human prefrontal cortex to delay performance. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Esposito, M. & Postle, B.R. (1999). The dependence of span and delayed-response performance on prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 37, 89–101.Google Scholar
D'Esposito, M., Postle, B.R., & Rypma, B. (2000). Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: Evidence from event-related fMRI studies. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Sala, S. & Logie, R.H. (1993). When working memory does not work: The role of working memory in neuropsychology. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol. 8, pp. 1–62): Elsevier.
DeRenzi, E. & Nichelli, P. (1975). Verbal and nonverbal short-term memory impairment following hemispheric damage. Cortex, 11, 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “‘Mini-Mental State’: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.” Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funahashi, S., Bruce, C.J., & Goldman-Rakic, P.S. (1989). Mnemonic coding of visual space in the monkey's dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 61, 331–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Funahashi, S., Bruce, C.J., & Goldman-Rakic, P.S. (1993). Dorsolateral prefrontal lesions and oculomotor delayed-response performance: Evidence for mnemonic “scotomas.” The Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 1479–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuster, J. (1989). The prefrontal cortex: Anatomy, physiology, and neuropsychology of the frontal lobes (2nd ed.). Raven Press: New York.
Fuster, J.M. & Alexander, G.E. (1971). Neuron activity related to short-term memory. Science, 173, 652–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghent, L., Mishkin, M., & Teuber, H.-L. (1962). Short-term memory after frontal-lobe injury in man. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 5, 705–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, C.G. & Weiskrantz, L. (1964). Some changes in behavior produced by lateral frontal lesions in the macaque. In R.M. Warren & K. Akert (Eds.), The frontal granular cortex and behavior (pp. 74–98). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gruber, O. (2001). Effects of domain-specific interference on brain activation associated with verbal working memory task performance. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 1047–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanley, J., Young, A., & Pearson, N. (1991). Impairment of the visuospatial sketchpad. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D.O. (1939). Intelligence in man after large removals of cerebral tissue: Report of four left frontal lobe cases. The Journal of General Psychology, 21, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, C.F. (1936). The functions of the frontal association areas in monkeys. Comparative Psychology Monographs, 13, 1–60.Google Scholar
Jonides, J. (1995). Working memory and thinking. In E.E. Smith & D.N. Osherson (Eds.), An invitation to cognitive science (Vol. 3, pp. 215–265). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jonides, J., Schumacher, E.H., Smith, E.E., Koeppe, R.A., Awh, E., Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Marschuetz, C., & Willis, C.R. (1998). The role of parietal cortex in verbal working memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 5026–5034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmo, R.B. (1942). Interference factors in delayed response in monkey after removal of the frontal lobes. Journal of Neurophysiology, 5, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manoach, D.S., Greve, D.N., Lindgren, K.A., & Dale, A.M. (2003). Identifying regional activity associated with temporally separated components of working memory using event-related functional MRI. NeuroImage, 20, 1670–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 272–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishkin, M. (1964). Perseveration of central sets after frontal lesions in monkeys. In J.M. Warren & K. Akert (Eds.), The frontal granular cortex and behavior (pp. 219–237). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mishkin, M. & Pribram, K.H. (1955). Analysis of the effects of frontal lesions in the monkey. I. Variations of delayed alternation. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 48, 492–495.Google Scholar
Mishkin, M. & Pribram, K.H. (1956). Analysis of the effects of frontal lesions in the monkey. II. Variations of delayed response. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 49, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, H.W., Riesen, A.H., & Nowlis, V. (1938). Delayed response and discrimination learning by chimpanzees. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 26, 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orbach, J. & Fischer, G.S. (1959). Bilateral resections of frontal granular cortex. Archives of Neurology, 1, 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasternak, T. & Greenlee, M.W. (2005). Working memory in primate sensory systems. Nature Review Neuroscience, 6, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulesu, E., Frith, C.D., & Frackowiak, R.S. (1993). The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory. Nature, 362, 342–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postle, B.R., Berger, J.S., & D'Esposito, M. (1999). Functional neuroanatomical double dissociation of mnemonic and executive control processes contributing to working memory performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 96, 12,959–12,964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postle, B.R., Druzgal, T.J., & D'Esposito, M. (2003). Seeking the neural substrates of visual working memory storage. Cortex, 39, 927–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postle, B.R., Zarahn, E., & D'Esposito, M. (2000). Using event-related fMRI to assess delay-period activity during performance of spatial and nonspatial working memory tasks. Brain Research Protocols, 5, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravizza, S.M., Delgado, M.R., Chein, J.M., Becker, J.T., & Fiez, J.A. (2004). Functional dissociations within the inferior parietal cortex in verbal working memory. NeuroImage, 22, 562–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter-Lorenz, P.A., Jonides, J., Smith, E.E., Hartley, A., Miller, A., Marshuetz, C., & Koeppe, R.A. (2000). Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, G.L., Rubens, A.B., & Jordan, L.S. (1984). Disturbances in long-term memory in aphasic patients. Brain, 107, 605–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarter, M., Bernston, G., & Cacioppo, J. (1996). Brain imaging and cognitive neuroscience: Toward strong inference in attributing function to structure. American Psychologist, 51, 13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shallice, T. & Warrington, E.K. (1970). Independent functioning of verbal memory stores: A neuropsychological study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 22, 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallar, G. & Papagno, C. (1995). Neuropsychological impairments of short-term memory. In A.D. Baddeley, B.A. Wilson, & F.N. Watts (Eds.), Handbook of memory disorders (pp. 135–165). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Warrington, E.K. (1979). Neuropsychological evidence for multiple memory systems. In Brain and mind: Ciba foundation symposium 69 (new series) (pp. 153–166). Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica.
Warrington, E.K., Logue, V., & Pratt, R.T.C. (1971). The anatomical localisation of selective impairment of auditory-verbal short-term memory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1981). WAIS-R manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Ween, J.E., Alexander, M.P., D'Esposito, M., & Roberts, M. (1996). Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology, 47, 388–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worsley, K.J. & Friston, K.J. (1995). Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited—again. NeuroImage, 2, 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarahn, E., Aguirre, G.K., & D'Esposito, M. (1997). A trial-based experimental design for functional MRI. NeuroImage, 6, 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar