Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T23:25:24.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Home Environment as a Predictor of Long-Term Executive Functioning following Early Childhood Traumatic Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2017

Christianne Laliberté Durish ,
Keith Owen Yeates ,
Terry Stancin ,
H. Gerry Taylor ,
Nicolay C. Walz  and
Shari L. Wade
Christianne Laliberté Durish*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Calgary, AB
Keith Owen Yeates
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Alberta Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB
Terry Stancin
Affiliation:
Division of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry & Psychology, Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University and MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
H. Gerry Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University and Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Nicolay C. Walz
Affiliation:
Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati, Ohio
Shari L. Wade
Affiliation:
Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Christianne Laliberté Durish, Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined the relationship of the home environment to long-term executive functioning (EF) following early childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Participants (N=134) were drawn from a larger parent study of 3- to 6-year-old children hospitalized for severe TBI (n=16), complicated mild/moderate TBI (n=44), or orthopedic injury (OI; n=74), recruited prospectively at four tertiary care hospitals in the United States and followed for an average of 6.8 years post-injury. Quality of the home environment, caregiver psychological distress, and general family functioning were assessed shortly after injury (i.e., early home) and again at follow-up (i.e., late home). Participants completed several performance-based measures of EF at follow-up. Hierarchical regression analyses examined the early and late home environment measures as predictors of EF, both as main effects and as moderators of group differences. Results: The early and late home environment were inconsistent predictors of long-term EF across groups. Group differences in EF were significant for only the TEA-Ch Walk/Don’t Walk subtest, with poorer performance in the severe TBI group. However, several significant interactions suggested that the home environment moderated group differences in EF, particularly after complicated mild/moderate TBI. Conclusions: The home environment is not a consistent predictor of long-term EF in children with early TBI and OI, but may moderate the effects of TBI on EF. The findings suggest that interventions designed to improve the quality of stimulation in children’s home environments might reduce the long-term effects of early childhood TBI on EF. (JINS, 2018, 24, 11–21)

Keywords

PreschoolNeuropsychologyAttentionProblem solvingParentingfamily
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 11 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, V.A., Catroppa, C., Morse, S., Haritou, F., & Rosenfeld, J. (2005). Functional plasticity or vulnerability after early brain injury? Pediatrics, 116, 1374–1382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, M., Catroppa, C., Godfrey, C., Morse, S., Rosenfeld, J.F., & Anderson, V. (2011). Selective changes in executive functioning ten years after severe childhood traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36(5), 578–595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S.W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7–15. doi: 10.1016/0010–0277(94)90018-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigler, E.D., Jantz, P.B., Farrer, T.J., Abildskov, T.J., Dennis, M., Gerhardt, C.A., & Yeates, K.O. (2015). Day of injury CT and late MRI findings: Cognitive outcome in a pediatric sample with complicated mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 29(9), 1062–1070.Google Scholar
Blair, C., Ravery, C.C., Berry, D.J., & The Family Life Project Investigators. (2014). Two approaches to estimating the effect of parenting on the development of executive function in early childhood. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 554–565.Google Scholar
Bradley, R.H., & Caldwell, B.M. (1984). The HOME Inventory and family demographics. Developmental Psychology, 20, 315–320.Google Scholar
Byles, J., Byrne, C., Boyle, M.H., & Oxford, O.R. (1988). Ontario Child Health Study: Reliability and validity of the General Functioning Scale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Family Process, 27, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, B., & Bradley, R. (1984). Home observation for measurement of the environment. Little Rock: University of Arkansas at Little Rock.Google Scholar
Camerota, M., Willoughby, M.T., Coz, M., Greenberg, M.T., & The Family Life Project Investigators. (2015). Executive function in low birth weight preschoolers: The moderating effect of parenting. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(8), 1551–1562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowe, L.M., Anderson, V., Barton, S., Babl, F.E., & Catroppa, C. (2014). Verbal ability and language outcome following traumatic brain injury in early childhood. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 29(3), 217–223.Google Scholar
Crowe, L.M., Catroppa, C., Babl, F.E., & Anderson, V. (2012). Intellectual, behavioral, and social outcomes of accidental traumatic brain injury in early childhood. Pediatrics, 129, e262–e268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Culbertson, W.C., & Zillmer, E.A. (1998). The Tower of LondonDX: A standardized approach to assessing executive functioning in children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13(3), 285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derogatis, L.R. (2000). The Brief Symptom Inventory-18 (BSI-18): Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L., & Melisaratos, N. (1983). The Brief Symptom Inventory: An introductory report. Psychological Medicine, 13, 595–605.Google Scholar
Derogatis, L., & Lazarus, L. (1994). SCL-90–R, Brief Symptom Inventory, and matching clinical rating scales. In M.E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (pp. 217–248). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Ewing-Cobbs, L., Prasad, M.R., Kramer, L., Cox, C.S. Jr., Baumgartner, J., Fletcher, S., & Swank, P. (2006). Late intellectual and academic outcomes following traumatic brain injury sustained during early childhood. Journal of Neurosurgery, 105(4 Suppl), 287–296.Google ScholarPubMed
Fan, J., McCandliss, B.D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M.I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(3), 340–347. doi: 10.1162/089892902317361886 Google Scholar
Faul, M., Xu, L., Wald, M.M., & Coronado, V.G. (2010). Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations and deaths 2002–2006. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, D., Hungerford, G.M., & Bagner, D.M. (2015). Topical review: Negative behavioural and cognitive outcomes following traumatic brain injury in early childhood. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40(4), 391–397.Google Scholar
Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to Medication, Moderation, and Conditionall Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kashluba, S., Hanks, R.A., Casey, J.E., & Mills, S.R. (2008). Neuropsychologic and functional outcome after complicated mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(5), 904–911.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konigs, M., Heij, H.A., van der Slujis, J.A., Vermeulen, J., Goslings, J.C., Luitse, J.S.K., & Oosterlaan, J. (2015). Pediatric traumatic brain injury and attention deficit. Pediatrics, 136(3), 534–541. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0437 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurowski, B.G., Taylor, G.H., Yeates, K.O., Walz, N.C., Stancin, T., & Wade, S.L. (2011). Caregiver ratings of long-term executive dysfunction and attention problems after early childhood traumatic brain injury: Family functioning is important. PM & R, 3(9), 836–845.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangeot, S., Armstrong, K., Colvin, A.N., Yeates, K.O., & Taylor, G.H. (2010). Long-term executive function deficits in children with traumatic brain injuries: Assessment using the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Child Neuropsychology, 8(4), 271–284.Google Scholar
Manly, T., Robertson, I.H., Anderson, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1999). TEA-Ch: The Test of Everyday Attention for Children Manual. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company Limited.Google Scholar
Miller, I.W., Bishop, D.S., Epstein, N.B., & Keitner, G.I. (1985). The McMaster Family Assessment Device: Reliability and validity. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 11, 345–356.Google Scholar
Papoutsis, J., Stargatt, R., & Catroppa, C. (2014). Long-term executive functioning outcomes for complicated and uncomplicated mild traumatic brain injury sustained in early childhood. Developmental Neuropsychology, 39(8), 638–645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, J.L., Wade, S.L., Walz, N.C., Cassedy, A., Yeates, K.O., Stevens, H.M., && Taylor, G.H. (2011). Parenting style is related to executive dysfunction after brain injury in children. Rehabilitation Psychology, 56(4), 351–358.Google Scholar
Robertson, I.H., Ward, A., Ridgeway, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1996). Test of everyday attention. Journal of the International Neurological Society, 2, 525–534.Google Scholar
Roskam, I., Stievenart, M., Meunier, J.-C., & Noel, M.-P. (2014). The development of children’s inhibition: Does parenting matter? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 122, 166–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarsour, K., Sheridan, M., Jutte, D., Nuru-Jeter, A., Hinshaw, S., & Boyce, W.T. (2011). Family socioeconomic status and child executive functions: The roles of language, home environment, and single parenthood. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 120–132. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710001335 Google Scholar
Schmidt, A.T., Hanten, G.R., Li, X., Vasquez, A.C., Wilde, E.A., Chapman, S.B., && Levin, H.S. (2012). Decision making after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Trajectory of recovery and relationship to age and gender. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 30(3), 225–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, L., Taylor, H.G., Drotar, D., Yeates, K.O., Wade, S.L., & Stancin, T. (2003). Long-term behavior problems after pediatric traumatic brain injury: Prevalence, predictors, and correlates. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 28, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slomine, B.S., Gerring, J.P., Grados, M.A., Vasa, R., Brady, K.D., Christensen, J.R., &&Denckla, M.B. (2002). Performance on measures of ‘executive function’ following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 16(9), 759–772.Google Scholar
Taylor, H.G., Yeates, K.O., Wade, S.L., Drotar, D., Stancin, T., & Minich, N. (2002). A prospective study of short- and long-term outcomes after traumatic brain injury in children: Behaviour and achievement. Neuropsychology, 16(1), 15–27.Google Scholar
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet, 2(7872), 81–84.Google Scholar
Wade, S.L., Borawski, E.A., Taylor, H.G., Drotar, D., Yeates, K.O., & Stancin, T. (2001). The relationship of caregiver coping to family outcomes during the initial year following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 406–415.Google Scholar
Wade, S.L., Cassedy, A., Walz, N.C., Taylor, H.C., Stancin, T., & Yeates, K.O. (2011). The relationship of parental warm responsiveness and negativity to emerging behavior problems following traumatic brain injury in young children. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 119–133.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Swift, E., Taylor, H.G., Wade, S.L., Drotar, D., Stancin, T., && Minich, N. (2004). Short- and long-term social outcomes following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 412–426.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Taylor, H.G., Drotar, D., Wade, S.L., Klein, S., Stancin, T., &&Schatschneider, C. (1997). Preinjury family environment as a determinant of recovery from traumatic brain injuries in school-age children. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3(6), 617–630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yeates, K.O., Taylor, H.G., Walz, N.C., Stancin, T., & Wade, S.L. (2010). The family environment as a moderator of psychosocial outcomes following traumatic brain injury in young children. Neuropsychology, 24(3), 345–356.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Taylor, H.G., Woodrome, S.E., Wade, S.L., Stancin, T., & Drotar, D. (2002). Race as a moderator of parent and family outcomes following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 27(4), 393–403.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Durish supplementary material

Tables S5-S10

Download Durish supplementary material(File)
File 154.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Durish supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Durish supplementary material(File)
File 123.4 KB