Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:19:54.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of contextual repetition priming treatments for anomia depends on intact access to semantics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2006

NADINE MARTIN ,
RUTH B. FINK ,
KATI RENVALL  and
MATTI LAINE
NADINE MARTIN
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Sciences, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
RUTH B. FINK
Affiliation:
Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
KATI RENVALL
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
MATTI LAINE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Turku University, Turku, Finland Department of Psychology, Åbo Akademi University, Åbo, Finland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Naming of two semantically impaired aphasic patients was treated with the contextual repetition priming technique, which involves repeated repetition of names of pictures that are related semantically, phonologically, or are unrelated. Our previous studies using this technique have suggested that patients with impaired access to lexical-semantic representations benefit in the short-term from this treatment technique, but show no long-term improvement in naming. In contrast, patients with good access to semantics show short- and long-term benefits from this treatment. Here we report two studies of treatment for two individuals with aphasia affecting access to lexical semantics and anomia but spared access to input and output phonology and spared conceptual semantics. We predicted that they would show short-term facilitation from the contextual priming, but no long-term improvements in naming. The results confirmed the prediction. An account of this pattern is offered within the framework of an interactive activation model of word retrieval. Additionally, we discuss alternative techniques for addressing naming deficits when access to semantics is impaired. (JINS, 2006, 12, 853–866.)

Keywords

AphasiaAnomiaSemanticsLearningLanguage therapySemantic aphasia
Type
SYMPOSIUM
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 12 , Issue 6 , November 2006 , pp. 853 - 866
Copyright
© 2006 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Best, W., Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Osborne, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Phonological and orthographic facilitation of word retrieval in aphasia: Immediate and delayed effects. Aphasiology, 16, 151–168.Google Scholar
Boyle, M. & Coehlo, C.A. (1995). Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment or aphasic dysnomia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 94–98.Google Scholar
Dell, G.S., Schwartz, M.F., Martin, N., Saffran, E.M., & Gagnon, D.A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. & Dunn, L. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Freed, D. & Marshall, R.C. (1995). The Effect of Personalized Cueing on Long-Term Naming of Realistic Visual Stimuli. American Journal of Speech Language Pathology, 4, 105–108.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. & Wingfield, A. (1997). Word finding deficits in aphasia: Brain-behavior relations and clinical symptomatology. In H. Goodglass & A. Wingfield (Eds.), Anomia: Neuroanatomical and Cognitive Correlates, pp. 5–27. San Diego: Academic Press.
Graham, K., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J.R. (1995). Progressive pure anomia: Insufficient activation of phonology by meaning. Neurocase, 1, 25–38.Google Scholar
Grossman, M. & Ash, S. (2004). Primary progressive aphasia: A review. Neurocase, 10, 3–18.Google Scholar
Gupta, P., Martin, N., Abbs, B., Schwartz, M.F., & Lipinski, J., (in press). New word learning in aphasic patients: Dissociating phonological and semantic components. Brain and Language.
Howard, D. (2000). Cognitive neuropsychology and aphasia therapy: The case of word retrieval. In I. Papathanasiou (Ed.), Acquired neurogenic communication disorders: A clinical perspective (pp. 76–99). London: Whurr Publishers.
Howard, D. & Patterson, K. (1992). The Pyramids and Palm Trees Test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.
Laine, M. & Martin, N. (1996). Lexical retrieval deficit in picture naming: Implications for word production models. Brain and Language, 53, 283–314.Google Scholar
Lambon Ralph, M.A., Sage, K., & Roberts, J. (2000). Classical anomia: A neuropsychological perspective on speech production. Neuropsychologia, 38, 186–202.Google Scholar
Le Dorze, G., Boulay, N., Gaudreau, J., & Brassard, C. (1994). The contrasting effects of a semantic versus a formal-semantic technique for the facilitation of naming in a case of anomia. Aphasiology, 8, 127–142.Google Scholar
Martin, N. & Ayala, J. (2004). Measurements of auditory-verbal STM in aphasia: Effects of task, item and word processing impairment. Brain and Language, 89, 464–483.Google Scholar
Martin, N., Fink, R., & Laine, M. (2004a). Treatment of word retrieval deficits with contextual priming. Aphasiology, 18, 457–471.Google Scholar
Martin, N., Fink, R., Laine, M., & Ayala, J. (2004b). Immediate and short-term effects of contextual priming on word retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 18, 867–898.Google Scholar
Martin, N. & Gupta, P. (2004). Exploring the relationship between word processing and verbal STM: Evidence from associations and dissociations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 213–228.Google Scholar
Martin, N. & Laine, M. (2000). Effects of contextual priming on impaired word retrieval. Aphasiology, 14, 53–70.Google Scholar
Martin, N. & Saffran, E.M. (1992). A computational account of deep dysphasia: Evidence from a single case study. Brain and Language, 43, 240–274.Google Scholar
Martin, N. & Saffran, E.M. (1997). Language and auditory-verbal short-term memory impairments: Evidence for common underlying processes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 641–682.Google Scholar
Martin, N. & Saffran, E.M. (1999). Effects of word processing and short-term memory deficits on verbal learning: Evidence from aphasia. International Journal of Psychology, 34, 330–346.Google Scholar
Martin, N. & Saffran, E.M. (2002). The relationship of input and output phonology in single word processing: Evidence from aphasia. Aphasiology, 16, 107–150.Google Scholar
Martin, N., Schwartz, M.F., & Kohen, F.P. (2005). Assessment of the ability to process semantic and phonological aspects of words in aphasia: A multi-measurement approach. Aphasiology, 20, 1–13.Google Scholar
McReynolds, L.V. & Kearns, K.P. (1983). Single-subject Experimental Designs in Communication Disorders. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Monsell, S. (1985). Repetition and the lexicon. In A. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language (pp. 147–195). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Nickels, L.A. (2002). Improving word-finding: Practice makes (closer to) perfect? Aphasiology, 16, 1047–1060.Google Scholar
Patterson, K. & Hodges, J.R. (1995). Disorders of semantic memory. In A.D. Baddeley, B.A. Wilson, & F.N. Watts (Eds.), Handbook of Memory Disorders (pp. 167–182). Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Patterson, K., Purell, C., & Morton, J. (1983). Facilitation of word retrieval in aphasia. In C. Code & D.J. Muller (Eds.), Aphasia Therapy (pp. 76–87). London: Edward Arnold.
Raymer, A.M. & Gonzales Rothi, L. (2002). Clinical diagnosis and treatment of naming disorders. In A.E. Hillis (Ed.), Handbook of Adult Language Disorders (pp. 163–182). Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Raymer, A.M., Thompson, C.K., Jacobs, B., & Le Grand, H.R. (1993). Phonological treatment of naming deficits in aphasia: Model-based generalization analysis. Aphasiology, 7, 27–54.Google Scholar
Renvall, K., Laine, M., Laakso, M., & Martin, N. (2003). Anomia treatment with contextual priming: A case study. Aphasiology, 17, 305–328.Google Scholar
Renvall, K., Laine, M., & Martin, N. (2005). Contextual priming in semantic anomia: A case study. Brain and Language, 95, 327–341.Google Scholar
Renvall, K., Laine, M., & Martin, N., (in press). Treatment of anomia with contextual priming: Exploration of a modified procedures with additional semantic and phonological tasks. Aphasiology.
Roach, A., Schwartz, M.F., Martin, N., Grewal, R.S., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia Naming Test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121–133.Google Scholar
Saffran, E.M., Schwartz, M.F., Linebarger, M., Martin, N., & Bochetto, P. (1988). Philadelphia Comprehension Battery (Unpublished Test Battery).
Schwartz, M.F., Dell, G.S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case series test of the two-step interactive model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 228–264.Google Scholar
Weigl, E. (1961). The phenomenon of deblocking in aphasia. Zeitschrift fur Phonetische Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung, 14, 337–361.Google Scholar