Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T13:21:07.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diagnostic utility of sound naming in early Alzheimer’s disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2009

HYEON-AE JEON  and
KYOUNG-MIN LEE
HYEON-AE JEON
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Program of Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
KYOUNG-MIN LEE*
Affiliation:
Interdisciplinary Program of Cognitive Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Department of Neurology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Kyoung-Min Lee, Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, 28 Yongon-Dong, Chongno-Gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While it is well known that picture naming (PN) is impaired in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), sound naming (SN) has not been thoroughly investigated. We postulated that SN might be impaired more severely and earlier than PN, given the early involvement of the temporal cortex by AD-related pathology. SN and PN were assessed in 21 normal participants, 40 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 27 patients in early stages of AD. Our results showed that SN accuracy and latency were more sensitive to advancing pathology in AD than PN accuracy and latency. SN was more useful and specific in distinguishing MCI patients from normal participants and therefore in potentially identifying the subset of MCI patients who already have impairment in more than one cognitive domain and may actually have incipient AD. These findings indicate a potential diagnostic utility of SN for early detection of the disease. Furthermore, even though most AD patients demonstrated more or less comparable impairment in both tasks, some were disproportionately impaired on SN and others were differentially impaired on PN. Future studies may be able to show that these discrepant groups correspond to patients with right and left hemisphere predominant AD, respectively. (JINS, 2009, 15, 231–238.)

Keywords

DementiaAlzheimer’s diseaseMild cognitive impairmentSound namingPicture namingResponse time
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 231 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © INS 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, M.L., Sparks, R., von Stockert, T., & Sax, D. (1972). A case study of auditory agnosia: Linguistic and non-linguistic processing. Cortex, 8, 427–443.Google Scholar
Albert, M.S., Duffy, F.H., & McAnulty, G.B. (1990). Electrophysiologic comparisons between two groups of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Archives of Neurology, 47, 857–863.Google Scholar
Appell, J., Kertesz, A., & Fisman, M. (1982). A study of language functioning in Alzheimer patients. Brain and Language, 17, 73–91.Google Scholar
Bak, T.H. & Mioshi, E. (2007). A cognitive bedside assessment beyond the MMSE: The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination. Practical Neurology, 7, 245–249.Google ScholarPubMed
Bayles, K.A. (1982). Language function in senile dementia. Brain and Language, 16, 265–280.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayles, K.A. & Tomoeda, C.K. (1983). Confrontation naming impairment in dementia. Brain and Language, 19, 98–114.Google Scholar
Becker, J.T., Huff, F.J., Nebes, R.D., Holland, A., & Boller, F. (1988). Neuropsychological function in Alzheimer’s disease: Pattern of impairment and rates of progression. Archives of Neurology, 45, 263–268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berg, L. & Morris, J.C. (1994). Diagnosis. In Terry, R.D., Katzman, R., & Bick, K. (eds.), Alzheimer’s disease (pp. 9–25). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Braak, H. & Braak, E. (1991). Neuropathological staging of Alzheimer’s-related changes. Acta Neuropathologica, 82, 239–259.Google Scholar
Braak, H., Braak, E., & Bohl, J. (1993). Staging of Alzheimer-related cortical destruction. European Neurology, 33, 403–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calero, M.D., Arnedo, M.L., Navarro, E., Ruiz-Pedrosa, M., & Carnero, C. (2002). Usefulness of a 15-item version of the Boston Naming Test in neuropsychological assessment of low-educational elders with dementia. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 57(2), 187–191.Google Scholar
Choi, S.H., Na, D.L., Lee, B.H., Hahn, D.S, Jeong, J.H., Yoon, S.J., Yoo, K.H., Ha, C.K., & Han, I.W. (2001). Estimating the validity of the Korean version of expanded Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR). Journal of Korean Neurological Association, 19, 585–591.Google Scholar
Clarke, S., Bellmann, A., De Ribaupierre, F., & Assal, G. (1996). Non-verbal auditory recognition in normal subjects and brain-damaged patients: Evidence for parallel processing. Neuropsychologia, 34, 587–603.Google Scholar
Crystal, H.A., Horoupian, D.S., Katzman, R., & Jotkowitz, S. (1982). Biopsy-proved Alzheimer disease presenting as a right parietal lobe syndrome. Annals of Neurology, 12, 186–188.Google Scholar
Delis, D.C., Kiefner, M., & Fridlund, A.J. (1988). Visuospatial dysfunction following unilateral brain damage: Dissociations in hierarchical and hemispatial analysis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 421–431.Google Scholar
Delis, D.C., Massman, P.J., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P., Shear, P.K., Demadura, T.L., & Filoteo, J.V. (1992). Spatial cognition in Alzheimer’s disease: Subtypes of global-local impairment. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14, 463–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esiri, M.M., Pearson, R.C.A., & Powell, T.P.S. (1986). The cortex of the primary auditory area in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Research, 366, 385–387.Google Scholar
Eustache, F., Lechevalier, B., Viader, F., & Lambert, J. (1990). Identification and discrimination disorders in auditory perception: A report on two cases. Neuropsychologia, 28, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faber-Langendoen, K., Morris, J.C., Knesevich, J.W., LaBarge, E., Miller, J.P., & Berg, L. (1988). Aphasia in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Annals of Neurology, 23, 365–370.Google Scholar
Fabiani, M., Kazmerski, V.A., Cycowicz, Y.M., & Friedman, D. (1996). Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: Effects of age and dementia. Psychophysiology, 33, 462–475.Google Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Fujii, T., Fukatsu, R., Watabe, S., Ohnuma, A., Teramura, K., Kimura, I., Saso, S., & Kogure, K. (1990). Auditory sound agnosia without aphasia following a right temporal lobe lesion. Cortex, 26, 263–268.Google Scholar
Gates, G.A., Karzon, R.K., Garcia, P., Peterein, J., Storandt, M., Morris, J.C., & Miller, J.P. (1995). Auditory dysfunction in aging and senile dementia of the Alzheimer’s type. Archives of Neurology, 52, 626–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, T.D., Rees, A., Witton, C., Cross, P.M., Shakir, R.A., & Green, G.G.R. (1997). Spatial and temporal auditory processing deficits following right hemisphere infarction: A psychophysical study. Brain, 120, 785–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, T.D., Rees, A., & Green, G.G.R. (1999). Disorders of human complex sound processing. Neurocase, 5, 365–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T.D. & Warren, J.D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews, 5, 887–892.Google Scholar
Hall, J. & Antonelli, P. (2001). Assessment of the peripheral and central auditory function. In Bailey, B.J.Johnson, J.T. & Newlands, S.D. (eds.), Head & neck surgery—Otolaryngology (pp. 1659–1672). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.Google Scholar
Hamberger, M.J. & Seidel, W.T. (2003). Auditory and Visual Naming Tests: Normative and patient data for accuracy, response time, and tip-of-the-tongue. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 479–489.Google Scholar
Han, C., Jo, S.A., Jo, I., Kim, E., Park, M.H., & Kang, Y. (2007). An adaptation of the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in elderly Koreans: Demographic influence and population-based norms (the AGE study). Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 47, 302–310. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2007.08.012.Google Scholar
Handel, S. (1988). Space is to time as vision is to audition: Seductive but misleading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 315–317.Google Scholar
Haxby, J.V., Duara, R., Grady, C.L., Cutler, N.R., & Rapoport, S.I. (1985). Relations between neuropsychological and cerebral metabolic asymmetries in early Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 5, 193–200.Google Scholar
Hopper, T., Bayles, K.A., & Kim, E. (2001). Retained neuropsychological abilities of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. Seminars in Speech and Language, 22, 261–273.Google Scholar
Hulette, C.M., Welsh-Bohmer, K.A., Murray, M.G., Saunders, A.M., Mash, D.C., & McIntyre, L.M. (1998). Neuropathological and neuropsychological changes in “Normal” aging: Evidence for preclinical Alzheimer disease in cognitively normal individuals. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, 27(12), 1168–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, B.T., Maskey, K.P., Van Hoesen, G.W., & Damasio, A.R. (1988). The auditory system in Alzheimer’s disease (AD): Hierarchical pattern of pathology. Neurology, 38(Suppl 1), 133.Google Scholar
Indefrey, P. & Levelt, W. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92, 101–144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, Y., Na, D.L., & Hahn, S. (1997). A validity study on the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. Journal of Korean Neurological Association, 15, 300–308.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Kaszniak, A.W., Wilson, R.S., Fox, J.H., & Stebbins, G.T. (1986). Cognitive assessment in Alzheimer’s disease: Cross-sectional and longitudinal perspectives. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 13, 420–423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kato, T., Knopman, D., & Liu, H. (2001). Dissociation of regional activation in mild AD during visual encoding: A functional MRI study. Neurology, 57, 812–816.Google Scholar
Kirshner, H.S., Webb, W.G., & Kelly, M.P. (1984). The naming disorder of dementia. Neuropsychologia, 22, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larrain, C.M. & Cimino, C. (1998). Alternate forms of the Boston Naming Test in Alzheimer’s disease. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D.A., Campbell, M.J., Terry, R.D., & Morrison, J.H. (1987). Laminar and regional distributions of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: A quantitative study of visual and auditory cortices. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 1799–1808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luce, R.D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Bowers, P., Lalond, F., Cox, C., Teleska, P., Fedio, P., Foster, N.L., & Chase, T.N. (1986). Towards a behavioral typology of Alzheimer’s patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 594–610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massman, P.J., Delis, D.C., Filoteo, J.V., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P., & Demadura, T.L. (1993). Mechanisms of spatial impairment in Alzheimer’s disease subgroups: Differential breakdown of directed attention to global-local stimuli. Neuropsychology, 7, 172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massman, P.J. & Doody, R.S. (1996). Hemispheric asymmetry in Alzheimer’s disease is apparent in motor functioning. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 18, 110–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E.M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology, 34(7), 939–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mesulam, M.M. (1983). The functional anatomy and hemispheric specialization for directed attention. The role of the parietal lobe and its connectivity. Trends in Neuroscience, 6(9), 348–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morton, J. (1969). The interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–178.Google Scholar
Naugle, R.I., Cullum, C.M., Bigler, E.D., & Massman, P.J. (1985). Neuropsychological and computerized axial tomography volume characteristics of empirically derived dementia subgroups. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 596–604.Google Scholar
Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383.Google Scholar
Ober, B.A., Jagust, W.J., Koss, E., Delis, D.C., & Friedland, R.P. (1991). Visuoconstructive performance and regional cerebral glucose metabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 752–772.Google Scholar
Petersen, R.C., Smith, G.E., Waring, S.C., Ivnik, R.J., Tangalos, E., & Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56(3), 303–308.Google Scholar
Petersen, R.C., Stevens, J.C., Ganguli, M., Tangalos, E.G., Cummings, J.L., & DeKosky, S.T. (2001). Practice parameter: Early detection of dementia: Mild cognitive impairment (an evidence-based review): Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology, 56, 1133–1142.Google Scholar
Pogacar, S. & Williams, R.S. (1984). Alzheimer’s disease presenting as slowly progressive aphasia. Rhode Island Medial Journal, 67, 181–185.Google Scholar
Small, B.J., Mobly, J.L., Laukka, E.J., Jones, S., & Backman, L. (2003). Cognitive deficits in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 107(Suppl 170), 29–33.Google Scholar
Snodgrass, J.G. & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.Google Scholar
Sperling, R.A., Bates, J.F., Chua, E.F., Cocchiarella, A.J., Rentz, D.M., Rosen, B.R., Schacter, D.L., & Albert, M.S. (2003). fMRI studies of associative encoding in young and elderly controls and mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 74, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreen, O., Benton, A.L., & Fincham, R.W. (1965). Auditory agnosia without aphasia. Archives of Neurology, 13, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suh, S.K. (1998). The Modern Korean Copular: Word frequency. Seoul, Korea: Yonsei University Press.Google Scholar
Testa, J.A., Ivnik, R.J., Boeve, B., Petersen, R.C., Pankratz, V.S., Knopman, D., Tangalos, E., & Smith, G.E. (2004). Confrontation naming does not add incremental diagnostic utility in MCI and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 504–512.Google Scholar
Vanderveer, N.J. (1979). Ecological acoustics: Human perception of environmental sounds. Dissertation Abstracts International. 40/09B, 4543. (University Microfilms No. 8004002).Google Scholar
Vignolo, L.A. (1982). Auditory agnosia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 298, 49–57.Google Scholar
Williams, B.W., Mack, W., & Henderson, V.W. (1989). Boston Naming Test in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 27, 1073–1079.Google Scholar