Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T20:40:31.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contextual cues remediate problem solving: Deficits in Parkinson’s disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

AMANDA L. PRICE*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Dr. Amanda Price, Department of Psychology, Elizabethtown College, Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania 17022. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study examined the contribution of executive functions to arrangement problem-solving performance in Parkinson’s disease (PD), with a particular focus on self-directed cognitive flexibility. PD patients and healthy age-matched adults completed a battery of neuropsychological measures of executive function and a series of anagram puzzles, some of which were modified to include graphemic cues designed to prime potential solutions. PD patients were less successful than healthy controls (HC) at resolving the anagram puzzles, but when a cue accompanied the anagram stimulus, PD patients performed normally. Anagram performance was associated with measures of verbal fluency and inhibition; no association emerged with working memory or set shifting ability. These data suggest that subjects with PD may have difficulty sufficiently inhibiting their automatic response to the experimental stimulus in order to generate the novel arrangements required to produce a successful response. Such deficits might be remediated through the use of environmental cues designed to support strategy generation. (JINS, 2010, 16, 70–76.)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Altgassen, M., Phillips, L., & Kopp, U. (2007). Role of working memory components in planning performance of individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 45, 23932397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Axelrod, B.N., Henry, R.R., & Woodard, J.L. (1992). Analysis of an abbreviated form of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 6, 2731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benton, A., & Hamsher, K. (1976). Multilingual Aphasia Examination manual. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Bondi, M., & Kasniak, A. (1991). Implicit and explicit memory in Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 338358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, R., & Marsden, C. (1990). Cognitive function in Parkinson’s disease: From description to theory. Trends in the Neurosciences, 13, 2129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, H., Bouchard, S., & Scherzer, P. (1994). Language and verbal reasoning in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 7, 166175.Google Scholar
Copland, D. (2003). The basal ganglia and semantic engagement: Potential insights from semantic priming in individuals with subcortical vascular lesions, Parkinson’s disease, and cortical lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 10411052.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.R., Parker, D.M., & Allan, K.M. (1991). The Short NART: Cross-validation, relationship to IQ and some practical considerations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30, 223229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crescentini, C., Mondolo, F., Biasutti, E., & Shallice, T. (2008). Supervisory and routine processes in noun and verb generation in nondemented patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 46, 434447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cronin-Golomb, A., & Braun, A. (1997). Visuospatial dysfunction and problem solving in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychology, 11, 4452.Google Scholar
Cronin-Golomb, A., Corkin, S., & Growdon, J.H. (1994). Impaired problem solving in Parkinson’s disease: Impact of a set-shifting deficit. Neuropsychologia, 32, 579593.Google Scholar
Eslinger, P.J., & Grattan, L.M. (1993). Frontal lobe and frontal-striatal substrates for different forms of human cognitive flexibility. Neuropsychologia, 31, 1728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farina, E. (1994). Frontal dysfunction in early Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 90, 3438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.Google Scholar
Goel, V., & Vartanian, O. (2005). Disassociating the roles of right ventral lateral and dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex in generation and maintenance of hypotheses in set-shift problems. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 11701177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, E., & Podell, K. (1999). Adaptive versus veridical decision making and frontal lobes. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 364377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldberg, E., Podell, K., & Lowell, M. (1994). Lateralization of frontal lobe functions and cognitive novelty. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychiatry, 22, 5668.Google Scholar
Greeno, J.G., (1978). Natures of problem solving abilities, In Estes, W.K. (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes, Vol. 5 (pp. 239270). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hanes, K.R., Andrewes, D.G., Smith, D.J., & Pantelis, C. (1996). A brief assessment of executive control dysfunction: Discriminant validity and homogeneity of planning, set shift, and fluency measures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 11, 185191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoehn, M., & Yahr, M. (1967). Parkinsonism: Onset, progression and mortality. Neurology, 17, 427442.Google Scholar
Lange, K.W., Robbins, T.W., & Marsden, C.D. (1992). L-Dopa withdrawal in Parkinson’s disease selectively impairs cognitive performance in tests sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction. Psychopharmacology, 107, 394404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, S., Cools, R., Robbins, T., Dove, A., Barker, R., & Owen, A. (2003). Using executive heterogeneity to explore the nature of working memory deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 41, 645654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longworth, C.E., Keenan, S.E., Barker, R.A., Marslen-Wilson, W.D., & Tyler, L.K. (2005). The basal ganglia and rule-governed language use: Evidence from vascular and degenerative conditions. Brain, 128, 584596.Google Scholar
McKinlay, A., Kaller, C.P., Grace, R.C., Dalrymple-Alford, J.C., Anderson, T., Fink, J., & Roger, D. (2008). Planning in Parkinson’s disease: A matter of problem structure? Neuropsychologia 46, 384389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, R.G., Downes, J.J., Sahakian, B.J., Evenden, J.L., Heald, A., & Robbins, T.W. (1988). Planning and spatial working memory in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 51, 757766.Google Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Novick, L.R., & Sherman, S.J. (2003). On the nature of insight solutions: Evidence from skill differences in anagram resolution. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 56A, 351382.Google Scholar
Ogden, J.A., Growdon, J.H., & Corkin, S. (1990). Deficits in visuospatial tests involving forward planning in high functioning Parkinsonians. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, & Behavioral Neurology, 3, 125139.Google Scholar
Owen, A.M., Doyon, J., Dagher, A., Sadikot, A., & Evans, A.C. (1998). Abnormal basal ganglia outflow in Parkinson’s disease identified with PET: Implications for higher cortical functions. Brain, 121, 949965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Owen, A.M., Sahakian, B.J., Hodges, J.R., Summers, B.A., Polkey, C.E., & Robbins, T.W. (1995). Dopamine-dependent fronto-striatal planning deficits in early Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychology, 9, 126140.Google Scholar
Price, A. (2006). Explicit category learning in Parkinson’s disease: Deficits related to impaired rule generation and selection processes. Neuropsychology, 20, 249257.Google Scholar
Salmon, D.P., & Filoteo, J.V. (2007). Neuropsychology of cortical versus subcortical dementia syndromes. Seminars in Neurology, 28, 721.Google Scholar
Salthouse, T.A., & Babcock, R.L. (1991). Decomposing adult age differences in working memory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 763776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheikh, J.I., & Yesavage, J.A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): Recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical gerontology: A guide to assessment and intervention (pp.165173). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, E.V., Sagar, H.J., Gabrieli, J.D., Corkin, S., & Growdon, J.H. (1989). Different cognitive profiles on standard behavioral tests in Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 799820.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swainson, R., SenGupta, D., Shetty, T., Watkins, L.H.A., Summers, B., Sahakian, B., et al. (2006). Impaired dimensional selection but intact use of reward feedback during visual discrimination learning in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 44, 12901304.Google Scholar
Taylor, A.E., Saint-Cyr, J.A., & Lang, A.E. (1986). Frontal lobe dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease. The cortical focus of neostriatal outflow. Brain, 109, 845883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomer, R., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Tsitrinbaum, Z. (2007). Dopamine asymmetry interacts with medication to affect cognition in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 45, 357367.Google Scholar
Tomer, R., Fisher, T., Giladi, N., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). Dissociation between spontaneous and reactive flexibility in early Parkinson’s disease. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 15, 106112.Google Scholar
Vartanian, O., & Goel, V. (2005). Right ventral lateral prefrontal cortex mediates hypothesis generation in an unconstrained anagram task. NeuroImage, 27, 927933.Google Scholar