Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:24:02.385Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cognitive and linguistic correlates of children's discourse after closed head injury: A three-year follow-up

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 December 2000

BONNIE L. BROOKSHIRE
Affiliation:
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
SANDRA B. CHAPMAN
Affiliation:
Callier Center for Communication Disorders, University of Texas, Dallas, Texas
JAMES SONG
Affiliation:
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
HARVEY S. LEVIN
Affiliation:
Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas

Abstract

The discourse of 91 children who had sustained severe (n = 68) or mild (n = 23) closed head injury (CHI) was examined at least three years postinjury. The groups' retellings of a narrative story were analyzed according to two domains, information and language. In comparison to the mild CHI group, the severe group produced stories characterized by reduced content and information, impaired organization, fewer words, and less complex sentences. The relationships between discourse production and the groups' performance on measures of language, executive function, memory, and processing speed were examined. Correlations were found between discourse production and general verbal ability including verbal fluency. Correlations were also found for discourse performance and executive function measures associated with problem solving and working memory. Site and extent of lesion were not useful in predicting discourse production. These findings indicate that children who sustain a severe closed head injury during early to middle childhood are at risk for persisting deficits in discourse processing and other cognitive abilities. (JINS, 2000, 6, 741–751)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)