Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:35:28.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment of familiarity and recollection in the false fame paradigm using a modified process dissociation procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

A. R. Mayes
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurology, N Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, England, S10 2JF
R. van Eijk
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurology, N Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, England, S10 2JF
C. L. Isaac
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Neurology, N Floor, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, England, S10 2JF

Abstract

A modified way of administering the process dissociation procedure to the false fame paradigm is described. Multidimensional signal detection theory (SDT) is used to correct for recollection as well as familiarity false alarms, and two experiments are reported that compare this method of false alarm correction with the hybrid procedure preferred by Jacoby et al. (1993). In experiment 1, it is shown that recollection and familiarity are lost at the same rate in normal subjects over a delay of 1 d when an SDT analysis is used. Analysis with the hybrid procedure fails to find any forgetting over the 1-d delay. In experiment 2, amnesics are shown to have preserved familiarity in the face of impaired recollection for names when the results are analyzed by either method. An additional analysis showed that the amnesics' familiarity was normal even for relatively novel surnames. The SDT analysis also revealed that the amnesics, relative to controls, showed a conservative recollection and a liberal familiarity response bias. The results indicate that it is important to correct for recollection as well as familiarity false alarms. (JINS, 1995, I, 469–482.)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, A.S. & Mitchell, D.B. (1994). A reevaluation of semantic versus nonsemantic processing in implicit memory. Memory and Cognition, 22, 533541.Google Scholar
Cermak, L.S., Verfaellie, M., Butler, T., & Jacoby, L.L. (1993). Attributions of familiarity in amnesia: Evidence from a fame judgment task. Neuropsychology, 7, 510518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Challis, B.H. & Brodbeck, D.R. (1992). Levels of processing affects priming in word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 595607.Google Scholar
Gardiner, J.M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 16, 309313.Google Scholar
Graf, P. & Komatsu, S. (1994). Process dissociation procedure: Handle with caution! European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 113129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, P. & Masson, M.E.J. (1993). Implicit Memory: New directions in cognition, development, and neuropsychology. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hintzman, D.L. & Hartry, A.L. (1990). Item effects in recognition and fragment completion: Contingency relations vary for different subsets of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 955969.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513541.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306340.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. & Kelley, C.M. (1992). In Milner, A.D. & Rugg, M.D. (eds.), The neuropsychology of consciousness (pp. 201233). London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L.L., Kelley, C., Brown, J., & Jasechko, J. (1989). Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 326338.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L., Toth, J.P., & Yonelinas, A.P. (1993). Separating conscious and unconscious influences of memory: Measuring recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 122, 139154.Google Scholar
Jacoby, L.L. & Whitehouse, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, L.L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, J.M. & Jacoby, L.L. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Ageing, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macmillan, N.A. & Creelman, C.D. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mandler, G. (1980). Recognising: The judgement of prior occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayes, A.R. (1988). Human organic memory disorders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mayes, A.R. (1992). Automatic memory processes in amnesia: How are they mediated? In Milner, A.D. & Rugg, M.D. (Eds.), The neuropsychology of consciousness (pp. 235261). London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory and Cognition, 21, 89102.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Sheu, C.F., & Gronlund, S.D. (1992). Testing global memory models using ROC curves. Psychological Review, 19, 447462.Google Scholar
Richardson-Klavehn, A. & Bjork, R.A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 475543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, H.L. (1990). Implicit memory: Retention without remembering. American Psychologist, 45, 10431056.Google Scholar
Roediger, H.L. & McDermott, K.B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In Boller, F. & Grafman, J. (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (Vol 8, pp. 63131). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Roediger, H.L. & McDermott, K.B. (1994). The problem of differing false-alarm rates for the process dissociation procedure: Comment on Verfaellie and Treadwell (1993). Neuropsychology, 8, 284288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M.E. & Oscar-Berman, M. (1990). Repetition priming of words and nonwords in divided attention and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16, 10331042.Google Scholar
Squire, L. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195231.Google Scholar
Squire, L.R. & McKee, R.D. (1992). The influence of prior events on cognitive judgments in amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 106115.Google Scholar
Squire, L.R. & McKee, R.D. (1993). Declarative and nondeclarative memory in opposition: When prior events influence amnesic patients more than normal subjects. Memory and Cognition, 21, 424430.Google Scholar
Toth, J.P., Reingold, E.M., & Jacoby, L.L. (1994). Towards a redefinition of implicit memory: Process dissociations fol following elaborative processing and self-generation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 290303.Google Scholar
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 112.Google Scholar
Verfaellie, M. & Treadwell, J.R. (1993). The status of recognition memory in amnesia. Neuropsychology, 7, 513.Google Scholar
Verfaellie, M. & Treadwell, J.R. (1994). A re-examination of recognition memory in amnesia: Reply to Roediger and McDermott. Neuropsychology, 8, 289292.Google Scholar
Whittlesea, B.W.A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of xperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19 12351253.Google Scholar
Whittlesea, B.W.A., Jacoby, L.L., & Girard, K. (1990). Illusions of immediate memory: Evidence of an attributional basis for feelings of familiarity and perceptual quality. Journal of emory and Language, 29 716732.Google Scholar