No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Assessment of calculation and number processing using the EC301 battery: Cross-cultural normative data and application to left- and right-brain damaged patients
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 January 2002
Abstract
To provide referential normative data on simple tasks dealing with number processing and calculation which could be used in clinical investigations, 551 normal volunteers aged between 18 and 69 years from France and Belgium (n = 180), Italy (n = 212) and Germany (n = 159), performed the 31 tasks which constitute the EC301 calculation and number processing battery. Differences between countries were significant for 16 tasks and a Gender × Education interaction was observed for some tasks, with men performing better than women among subjects with low education only. To present an overview of preserved and impaired calculation and number processing abilities in left-brain damaged (LBD) aphasic patients and right-brain damaged (RBD) nonaphasic patients, the 31 subtests of the EC301 battery were proposed to 80 patients with cerebrovascular accident, 56 left and 24 right, for most cases in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. LBD aphasic patients showed low performance on oral and alphabetical spoken verbal and written verbal counting, transcoding when a written code was involved, and mental or written calculation; but relatively good performance at finding the number of elements in small sets, comparing numbers written in the Arabic digital code and placing correctly numbers on an analogue number line. The lowest performances of RBD patients were observed for estimation tasks and for placing a number on a scale. Results and their implications for further research are discussed according to the present information processing and anatomofunctional models of calculation and number processing. (JINS, 2001, 7, 840–859.)
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 7 , Issue 7 , November 2001 , pp. 840 - 859
- Copyright
- © 2001 The International Neuropsychological Society