Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T20:41:38.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

WMS–III performance in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy: Group differences and individual classification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2002

NANCY WILDE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
ESTHER STRAUSS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
GORDON J. CHELUNE
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
DAVID W. LORING
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia
ROY C. MARTIN
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
BRUCE P. HERMANN
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, University of Wisconsin at Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
ELISABETH M.S. SHERMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, BC's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
MICHAEL HUNTER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

The utility of the WMS–III in detecting lateralized impairment was examined in a large sample of patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Methods of analysis included evaluation of group means on the various indexes and subtest scores, the use of ROC curves, and an examination of Auditory–Visual Index discrepancy scores. In addition, performance on immediate and delayed indexes in the auditory and the visual modality was compared within each group. Of the WMS–III scores, the Auditory–Visual Delayed Index difference score appeared most sensitive to side of temporal dysfunction, although patient classification rates were not within an acceptable range to have clinical utility. The ability to predict laterality based on statistically significant index score differences was particularly weak for those with left temporal dysfunction. The use of unusually large discrepancies led to improved prediction, however, the rarity of such scores in this population limits their usefulness. Although the utility of the WMS–III in detecting laterality may be limited in preoperative cases, the WMS–III may still hold considerable promise as a measure of memory in documenting baseline performance and in detecting those that may be at risk following surgery. (JINS, 2001, 7, 881–891.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2001 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)