Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:03:34.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Swedish Version of the Hayling Test: Clinical Utility in Frontotemporal Dementia Syndromes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2018

Susanna Vestberg ,
Erik Blennow Nordström ,
Maria Landqvist Waldö ,
Karin Nilsson ,
Alexander Frizell Santillo  and
Christer Nilsson
Susanna Vestberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Erik Blennow Nordström
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Maria Landqvist Waldö
Affiliation:
Division of Clinical Sciences Helsingborg, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Karin Nilsson
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Neurology, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Alexander Frizell Santillo
Affiliation:
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
Christer Nilsson
Affiliation:
Clinical Memory Research Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences Malmö, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Susanna Vestberg, Department of Psychology, Box 213, 22100 Lund, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Hayling test (HT-S) and its clinical utility in a group of patients with different frontotemporal dementia (FTD) syndromes. Early diagnosis of FTD is a challenge and requires a broad arsenal of assessment methods, neuropsychological tests not the least. The Hayling test assesses executive functions including initiation, efficiency and response inhibition. Methods: Seventy-six healthy controls were included as well as patients with the behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD; n = 17), semantic dementia (SD, n = 6), and progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 12). The Color Word Interference Test was administered to examine the construct validity. Results: Age showed a correlation with better performances in younger participants whereas the importance of sex and education were less evident. The split half reliability and internal consistency were equal to, or better, than reported for the original version. The interrater reliability was excellent. The construct validity was supported, nevertheless indicating partly different processes behind the performances of the two tests. The FTD group performed significantly worse than healthy controls on efficiency and response inhibition and there were also significant differences in performances between the syndromes despite small samples. Conclusions: The psychometric properties and clinical utility of the Swedish version are satisfactory for measuring efficiency and response inhibition with results indicating dissimilar profiles in the performances in the different syndromes. These results need to be corroborated in larger samples. (JINS, 2019, 25, 195–203)

Keywords

Neuropsychological testsExecutive functionInhibitionPsychometricSwedenEarly diagnosis
Type
Regular Research
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , February 2019 , pp. 195 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andres, P., & Van der Linden, M. (2000). Age-related differences in supervisory attentional system functions. Journals of Gerontology. Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 55(6), P373–P380.Google Scholar
Belleville, S., Rouleau, N. & Van der Linden, M. (2006). Use of the Hayling task to measure inhibition of prepotent responses in normal aging and Alzheimer”s disease. Brain and Cognition, 62(2), 113–119. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2006.04.006 Google Scholar
Bielak, A.A., Mansueti, L., Strauss, E., & Dixon, R.A. (2006). Performance on the Hayling and Brixton tests in older adults: Norms and correlates. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21(2), 141–149. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.08.006 Google Scholar
Borella, E., Ludwig, C., Fagot, D., & De Ribaupierre, A. (2011). The effect of age and individual differences in attentional control: A sample case using the Hayling test. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 53(1), e75–e80. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2010.11.005 Google Scholar
Burgess, P.W., & Shallice, T. (1996). Response suppression, initiation and strategy use following frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 34(4), 263–272.Google Scholar
Burgess, P.W., & Shallice, T. (1997). The Hayling and Brixton Tests. United Kingdom: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
Chan, R.C., Chen, E.Y., Cheung, E.F., & Cheung, H.K. (2004). Executive dysfunctions in schizophrenia. Relationships to clinical manifestation. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 254(4), 256–262. doi:10.1007/s00406-004-0492-3 Google Scholar
Chan, R.C., Shum, D., Toulopoulou, T., & Chen, E.Y. (2008). Assessment of executive functions: Review of instruments and identification of critical issues. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(2), 201–216. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2007.08.010 Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D.V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290.Google Scholar
Cipolotti, L., Spano, B., Healy, C., Tudor-Sfetea, C., Chan, E., White, M., … Bozzali, M. (2016). Inhibition processes are dissociable and lateralized in human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia, 93(Pt A), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.09.018 Google Scholar
Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Delfiore, G., Degueldre, C., Luxen, A., & Salmon, E. (2001). The functional anatomy of inhibition processes investigated with the Hayling task. Neuroimage, 14(2), 258–267. doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0846 Google Scholar
Cotrena, C., Damiani Branco, L., Ponsoni, A., Milman Shansis, F., Kochhann, R., & Paz Fonseca, R. (2017). The predictive role of daily cognitive stimulation on executive functions in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Research, 252, 256–261. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2017.03.011 Google Scholar
Delis, D.C., Kaplan, F., & Kramer, J.H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Pillon, B., Beato, R., Villalponda, J.M., & Litvan, I. (2005). “Applause sign” helps to discriminate PSP from FTD and PD. Neurology, 64(12), 2132–2133. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000165977.38272.15 Google Scholar
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.Google Scholar
Ghosh, B.C., Carpenter, R.H., & Rowe, J.B. (2013). A longitudinal study of motor, oculomotor and cognitive function in progressive supranuclear palsy. PLoS One, 8(9), e74486. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074486 Google Scholar
Gorno-Tempini, M.L., Hillis, A.E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S.F., … Grossman, M. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, 76(11), 1006–1014. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6 Google Scholar
Gustafson, L., Brun, A., & Passant, U. (1992). Frontal lobe degeneration of non-Alzheimer type. Bailliere’s Clinical Neurology, 1(3), 559–582.Google Scholar
Hoglinger, G.U., Respondek, G., Stamelou, M., Kurz, C., Josephs, K.A., Lang, A.E. Movement Disorder Society-endorsed PSP Study Group. (2017). Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria. Movement Disorders, 32(6), 853–864. doi:10.1002/mds.26987 Google Scholar
Hornberger, M., Geng, J., & Hodges, J.R. (2011). Convergent grey and white matter evidence of orbitofrontal cortex changes related to disinhibition in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Brain, 134(Pt 9), 2502–2512. doi:10.1093/brain/awr173 Google Scholar
Hornberger, M., Piguet, O., Kipps, C., & Hodges, J.R. (2008). Executive function in progressive and nonprogressive behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 71(19), 1481–1488. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000334299.72023.c8 Google Scholar
Hornberger, M., Savage, S., Hsieh, S., Mioshi, E., Piguet, O., & Hodges, J.R. (2010). Orbitofrontal dysfunction discriminates behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 30(6), 547–552. doi:10.1159/000321670 Google Scholar
Hughes, C.P., Berg, L., Danziger, W.L., Coben, L.A., & Martin, R.L. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 566–572.Google Scholar
Jantscher, S., Willinger, U., Schmöger, M., Müller, C., & Auff, E. (2011). Validation of the Hayling sentence completion test - German version & Stroop-test . Paper presented at the 19th European Congress of Psychiatry, European Psychiatry. Retrieved from http://www.europsy-journal.com/article/S0924-9338(11)72128-9/abstract Google Scholar
Johns, E.K., Phillips, N.A., Belleville, S., Goupil, D., Babins, L., Kelner, N., … Chertkow, H. (2009). Executive functions in frontotemporal dementia and Lewy body dementia. Neuropsychology, 23(6), 765–777. doi:10.1037/a0016792 Google Scholar
Kertesz, A., Davidson, W., & Fox, H. (1997). Frontal behavioral inventory: Diagnostic criteria for frontal lobe dementia. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 24(1), 29–36.Google Scholar
Knopman, D.S., Kramer, J.H., Boeve, B.F., Caselli, R.J., Graff-Radford, N.R., Mendez, M.F., … Mercaldo, N. (2008). Development of methodology for conducting clinical trials in frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Brain, 131(Pt 11), 2957–2968. doi:10.1093/brain/awn234 Google Scholar
Landin-Romero, R., Tan, R., Hodges, J.R., & Kumfor, F. (2016). An update on semantic dementia: Genetics, imaging, and pathology. Alzheimer’s Research & Therapy, 8(1), 52. doi:10.1186/s13195-016-0219-5 Google Scholar
Landqvist Waldo, M., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., & Englund, E. (2015). Psychotic symptoms in frontotemporal dementia: A diagnostic dilemma? International Psychogeriatrics, 27(4), 531–539. doi:10.1017/S1041610214002580 Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., Bigler, E.D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Litvan, I., Agid, Y., Calne, D., Campbell, G., Dubois, B., Duvoisin, R.C., … Zee, D.S. (1996). Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): Report of the NINDS-SPSP international workshop. Neurology, 47(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Lough, S., Kipps, C.M., Treise, C., Watson, P., Blair, J.R., & Hodges, J.R. (2006). Social reasoning, emotion and empathy in frontotemporal dementia. Neuropsychologia, 44(6), 950–958. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.08.009 Google Scholar
Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T.D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0734 Google Scholar
Neary, D., Snowden, J.S., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., Stuss, D., Black, S., … Benson, D.F. (1998). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 51(6), 1546–1554.Google Scholar
O’Callaghan, C., Naismith, S.L., Hodges, J.R., Lewis, S.J., & Hornberger, M. (2013). Fronto-striatal atrophy correlates of inhibitory dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease versus behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Cortex, 49(7), 1833–1843. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.003 Google Scholar
Perez-Perez, A., Matias-Guiu, J.A., Caceres-Guillen, I., Rognoni, T., Valles-Salgado, M., Fernandez-Matarrubia, M., … Matias-Guiu, J. (2016). The Hayling Test: Development and normalization of the Spanish version. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(5), 411–419. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw027 Google Scholar
Ponterotto, J.G., & Ruckdeschel, D.E. (2007). An overview of coefficient alpha and a reliability matrix for estimating adequacy of internal consistency coefficients with psychological research measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 105(3 Pt 1), 997–1014. doi:10.2466/pms.105.3.997–1014 Google Scholar
Rascovsky, K., Hodges, J.R., Knopman, D., Mendez, M.F., Kramer, J.H., Neuhaus, J., … Miller, B.L. (2011). Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain, 134(Pt 9), 2456–2477. doi:10.1093/brain/awr179 Google Scholar
Santillo, A.F., Lundblad, K., Nilsson, M., Landqvist Waldo, M., van Westen, D., Latt, J., … Nilsson, C. (2016). Grey and white matter clinico-anatomical correlates of disinhibition in neurodegenerative disease. PLoS One, 11(10), e0164122. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164122 Google Scholar
Santillo, A.F., Martensson, J., Lindberg, O., Nilsson, M., Manzouri, A., Landqvist Waldo, M., … Nilsson, C. (2013). Diffusion tensor tractography versus volumetric imaging in the diagnosis of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. PLoS One, 8(7), e66932. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066932 Google Scholar
Schroeter, M.L., Laird, A.R., Chwiesko, C., Deuschl, C., Schneider, E., Bzdok, D., … Neumann, J. (2014). Conceptualizing neuropsychiatric diseases with multimodal data-driven meta-analyses - the case of behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Cortex, 57, 22–37. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.02.022 Google Scholar
Shallice, T., & Burgess, P. (1998). The domain of supervisory processes and the temporal organization of behaviour In A.C. Roberts, T.W. Robbins, & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Siqueira, L.S., Goncalves, H.A., Hubner, L.C., & Fonseca, R.P. (2016). Development of the Brazilian version of the Child Hayling Test. Trends Psychiatry Psychother, 38(3), 164–174. doi:10.1590/2237-6089-2016-0019 Google Scholar
Spitzer, D., White, S.J., Mandy, W., & Burgess, P.W. (2017). Confabulation in children with autism. Cortex, 87, 80–95. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.004 Google Scholar
Stenback, V., Hallgren, M., Lyxell, B., & Larsby, B. (2015). The Swedish Hayling task, and its relation to working memory, verbal ability, and speech–recognition-in-noise. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 56(3), 264–272. doi:10.1111/sjop.12206 Google Scholar
Stroop, R.J. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.Google Scholar
Vijverberg, E.G., Dols, A., Krudop, W.A., Peters, A., Kerssens, C.J., van Berckel, B.N., … Pijnenburg, Y.A. (2016). Diagnostic accuracy of the frontotemporal dementia consensus criteria in the late-onset frontal lobe syndrome. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 41(3-4), 210–219. doi:10.1159/000444849 Google Scholar
Williams, D.R., & Lees, A.J. (2009). Progressive supranuclear palsy: Clinicopathological concepts and diagnostic challenges. Lancet Neurology, 8(3), 270–279. doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70042-0 Google Scholar
Woollacott, I.O., & Rohrer, J.D. (2016). The clinical spectrum of sporadic and familial forms of frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neurochemistry, 138(Suppl 1), 6–31. doi:10.1111/jnc.13654 Google Scholar