Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T12:46:11.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Semantic and phonological processing in illiteracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2004

MARY H. KOSMIDIS ,
KYRANA TSAPKINI ,
VASILIKI FOLIA ,
CHRISTINA H. VLAHOU  and
GRIGORIS KIOSSEOGLOU
MARY H. KOSMIDIS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
KYRANA TSAPKINI
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
VASILIKI FOLIA
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
CHRISTINA H. VLAHOU
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
GRIGORIS KIOSSEOGLOU
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Researchers of cognitive processing in illiteracy have proposed that the acquisition of literacy modifies the functional organization of the brain. They have suggested that, while illiterate individuals have access only to innate semantic processing skills, those who have learned the correspondence between graphemes and phonemes have several mechanisms available to them through which to process oral language. We conducted 2 experiments to verify that suggestion with respect to language processing, and to elucidate further the differences between literate and illiterate individuals in the cognitive strategies used to process oral language, as well as hemispheric specialization for these processes. Our findings suggest that semantic processing strategies are qualitatively the same in literates and illiterates, despite the fact that overall performance is augmented by increased education. In contrast, explicit processing of oral information based on phonological characteristics appears to be qualitatively different between literates and illiterates: effective strategies in the processing of phonological information depend upon having had a formal education, regardless of the level of education. We also confirmed the differential abilities needed for the processing of semantic and phonological information and related them to hemisphere-specific processing. (JINS, 2004, 10, 818–827.)

Keywords

IlliteracyNeuropsychologicalSemanticPhonologicalLanguage processingGreek
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 10 , Issue 6 , October 2004 , pp. 818 - 827
Copyright
© 2004 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahonniska, J., Cantell, M., Tolvanen, A., & Lyytinen, H. (1993). Speech perception and brain laterality: The effect of ear advantage on auditory event-related potentials. Brain and Language, 45, 127–146.Google Scholar
Ardila, A., Rosselli, M., & Rosas, P. (1989). Neuropsychological assessment in illiterates: Visuospatial and memory abilities. Brain and Cognition, 11, 147–166.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.Google Scholar
Castro, S.L. & Morais, J. (1987). Ear differences in illiterates. Neuropsychologia, 25, 409–417.Google Scholar
Castro-Caldas, A., Petersson, K.M., Reis, A., Stone-Elander, S., & Ingvar, M. (1998). The illiterate brain: Learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult brain. Brain, 121, 1053–1063.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.J. & Stanczak, D.E. (2000). On the reliability, validity, and cognitive structure of the Thurstone Word Fluency Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 267–279.Google Scholar
Crossley, M., D'Arcy, C., & Rawson, N.S.B. (1997). Letter and category fluency in community-dwelling Canadian seniors: A comparison of normal participants to those with dementia of the Alzheimer or vascular type. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 52–62.Google Scholar
Damasio, A.R., Castro-Caldas, A., Grosso, J.T., & Ferro, J.M. (1976). Brain specialization for language does not depend on literacy. Archives of Neurology, 33, 300–301.Google Scholar
Joanette, Y., Lecours, A.R., Lepage, Y., & Lamoureux, M. (1983). Language in right-handers with right-hemisphere lesions: A preliminary study including anatomical, genetic and social factors. Brain and Language, 20, 217–248.Google Scholar
Karavatos, A., Kaprinis, G., & Tzavaras, A. (1984). Hemispheric specialization for language in the congenitally blind: The influence of the Braille system. Neuropsychologia, 22, 521–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempler, D., Teng, E.L., Dick, M., Taussig, M., & Davis, D. (1998). The effects of age, education, and ethnicity on verbal fluency. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 531–538.Google Scholar
Kosmidis, M.H., Bozikas, V.P., Vlahou, C.H., & Karavatos, A. (2003). Verbal fluency in institutionalized patients with schizophrenia: Age-related performance decline. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Kosmidis, M.H., Vlahou, C.H., Panagiotaki, P., & Kiosseoglou, G. (2004). The Verbal Fluency Task in the Greek population: Normative data and clustering and switching strategies. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 164–172.Google Scholar
Lecours, A.R., Mehler, J., Parente, M.A., Beltrami, M.C., Silva, A.B., Tolipan, L.C., Cary, L., Castro, M.J., Carrono, V., Chagastelles, L., Dehaut, F., Delgado, R., Evangelista, A., Fajgenbaum, S., Fontoura, C., de Fraga Karmann, D., Gurd, J., Torné, C.H., Jakubovicz, R., Kac, R., Lefevre, B., Lima, B., Maciel, J., Mansur, L., Nobrega, M.C., Osorio, Z., Pasiornic, J., Papaterra, F., Penedo, M., & Texeira, M. (1987). Illiteracy and brain damage 3: A contribution to the study of speech and language disorders in illiterates with unilateral brain damage (initial testing). Neuropsychologia, 26, 575–589.Google Scholar
Manly, J.J., Jacobs, D.M., Sano, M., Bell, K., Merchant, C.A., Small, S.A., & Stern, Y. (1999). Effect of literacy on neuropsychological test performance in nondemented, education-matched elders. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 191–202.Google Scholar
Matute, E., Leal, F., Zarabozo, D., Robles, A., & Cedilo, C. (2000). Does literacy have an effect on stick construction? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 6, 668–672.Google Scholar
Morais, J., Cary, L., Alegria, J., & Bertelson, P. (1979). Does awareness of speech as a sequence of phones arise spontaneously? Cognition, 7, 323–331.Google Scholar
Ostrosky-Solis, F., Jaime, R.M., & Ardila, A. (1998). Memory abilities during normal aging. International Journal of Neuroscience, 93, 151–162.Google Scholar
Ostrosky-Solis, F., Davila, G., Ortiz, X., Vega, F., Garcia Ramos, G., de Celis, M., Davila, L., Gomez, C., Jimenez, S., Juarez, S., Corte, G., & Molina, B. (1999). Determination of normative criteria and validation of the SKT for use in Spanish-speaking populations. International Journal of Psychogeriatrics, 11, 171–180.Google Scholar
Petersson, K.M., Reis, A., Askelöf, A., Castro-Caldas, A., & Ingvar, M. (1998). Differences in interhemispheric interactions between literate and illiterate subjects during verbal repetition. Neuroimage, 7, S217.Google Scholar
Petersson, K.M., Reis, A., & Ingvar, M. (2001). Cognitive processing in literate and illiterate subjects: A review of some recent behavioral and functional neuroimaging data. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratcliff, G., Ganguli, M., Chandra, V., Sharma, S., Belle, S., Seaberg, E., & Pandav, R. (1998). Effects of literacy and education on measures of word fluency. Brain and Language, 61, 115–122.Google Scholar
Reinvang, I., Bakke, S.J., Hugdahl, K., Karlsen, N.R., & Sundet, K. (1994). Dichotic listening performance in relation to callosal area on the MRI scan. Neuropsychology, 8, 445–450.Google Scholar
Reis, A. & Castro-Caldas, A. (1997). Illiteracy: A cause for biased cognitive development. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 3, 444–450.Google Scholar
Reis, A., Guerreiro, M., & Petersson, K.M. (2003). A socio-demographic and neuropsychological characterization of an illiterate population. Applied Neuropsychology, 10, 191–204.Google Scholar
Tombaugh, T.N., Kozak, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and Animal Naming. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 167–177.Google Scholar
Tomer, R. & Levin, B.E. (1993). Differential effects of aging on two verbal fluency tasks. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 465–466.Google Scholar
Troyer, A.K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11, 138–146.Google Scholar
Tzavaras, A., Kaprinis, G., & Gatzoyas, A. (1981). Literacy and hemispheric specialization for language: Digit dichotic listening in illiterates. Neuropsychologia, 19, 565–570.Google Scholar
Tzavaras, A., Phocas, C., Kaprinis, G., & Karavatos, A. (1993). Literacy and hemispheric specialization for language: Dichotic listening in young functionally illiterate men. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 195–199.Google Scholar