Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:37:22.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Indiana University Telephone-Based Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: A new method for large scale neuropsychological assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2007

FREDERICK W. UNVERZAGT ,
PATRICK O. MONAHAN ,
LYNDSI R. MOSER ,
QIANQIAN ZHAO ,
JANET S. CARPENTER ,
GEORGE W. SLEDGE  and
VICTORIA L. CHAMPION
FREDERICK W. UNVERZAGT
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
PATRICK O. MONAHAN
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
LYNDSI R. MOSER
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
QIANQIAN ZHAO
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
JANET S. CARPENTER
Affiliation:
Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana
GEORGE W. SLEDGE
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
VICTORIA L. CHAMPION
Affiliation:
Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis, Indiana
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sensitive measures of neuropsychological function were adapted to a telephone administration format for use in a large survey of quality of life in breast cancer survivors (BCS). Healthy controls (HC) and BCS were recruited from the community and administered the same neuropsychological test battery on two occasions separated by 1 week. Subjects were randomly assigned to conditions, stratified by diagnosis: In-person at Time-1 and In-person at Time-2 (P-P); Telephone at Time-1 and Telephone at Time-2 (T-T); T-P; and P-T. Four cognitive (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Controlled Oral Word Association, Digit Span, Symbol Digit) and two self-report measures (Squire Memory Self-Report Scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) were used. The 106 subjects were randomized (54 HC and 52 BCS). Test–retest reliabilities (intraclass correlations) did not differ significantly by condition across the cognitive or self-report measures and ranged from moderate to near perfect (r's .43–.93; p's < .05). Mean scores at Time-1, practice effects (Time-1 to Time-2), and standard errors of measurement were comparable between In-person and Telephone administration formats. Results suggest that memory, attention, information processing speed, verbal fluency, and self-report of mood and memory can be measured reliably and precisely over the telephone. (JINS, 2007, 13, 799–806.)

Keywords

Mass screeningNeuropsychological testCognitionMemoryMild cognitive ImpairmentDiagnosisDementia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 13 , Issue 5 , September 2007 , pp. 799 - 806
Copyright
2007 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahles, T.A., Saykin, A.J., Furstenberg, C.T., Cole, B., Mott, L.A., Skalla, K., Whedon, M.B., Bivens, S., Mitchell, T., Greenberg, E.R., & Silberfarb, P.M. (2002). Neuropsychologic impact of standard-dose systemic chemotherapy in long-term survivors of breast cancer and lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 20, 485–493.Google Scholar
Benton, A.L. & Hamsher, K.D. (1989). Multilingual Aphasia Examination. Iowa City, Iowa: AJA Associates.
Berglund, G., Bolund, C., Fornander, T., Rutqvist, L.E., & Sjoden, P.O. (1991). Late effects of adjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy on quality-of-life among breast-cancer patients. European Journal of Cancer, 27, 1075–1081.Google Scholar
Brandt, J., Spencer, M., & Folstein, M. (1988). The telephone interview for cognitive status. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 1, 111–117.Google Scholar
Brezden, C., Phillips, K., Abdolell, M., Bunston, T., & Tannock, I. (2000). Cognitive function in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18, 2695–2701.Google Scholar
Christensen, H., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., & Jacomb, P. (1991). The psychometric differentiation of dementia from normal aging: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 3, 147–155.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Geffen, G.M., Butterworth, P., & Geffen, L.B. (1994). Test-retest reliability of a new form of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 9, 303–316.Google Scholar
Hurria, A., Goldfarb, S., Rosen, C., Holland, J., Zuckerman, E., Lachs, M.S., Witmer, M., Van Gorp, W.G., Fornier, M., D'Andrea, G., Moasser, M., Dang, C., Van Poznak, C., Robson, M., Currie, V.E., Theodoulou, M., Norton, L., & Hudis, C. (2006). Effect of adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy on cognitive function from the older patient's perspective. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 98, 343–348.Google Scholar
Landis, J.R. & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.Google Scholar
Lezak, M., Howieson, D., Loring, D., & Hannay, H.F.J. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Maloni, J.A., Park, S., Anthony, M.K., & Musil, C.M. (2005). Measurement of antepartum depressive symptoms during high-risk pregnancy. Research in Nursing & Health, 28, 16–26.Google Scholar
McGraw, K. & Wong, S. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1, 30–46.Google Scholar
Parks, K.A., Pardi, A.M., & Bradizza, C.M. (2006). Collecting data on alcohol use and alcohol-related victimization: A comparison of telephone and Web-based survey methods. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 318–323.Google Scholar
Plassman, B.L., Newman, T.T., Welsh, K.A., Helms, M., & Breitner, J.C.S. (1994). Properties of the telephone interview for cognitive status: Application in epidemiological and longitudinal studies. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 7, 235–241.Google Scholar
Radloff, L. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measures, 1, 385–401.Google Scholar
Rey, A. (1941). L'examen psychologique dans les cas d'encephalopathie traumatique. Archives de Psychologie, 28, 286–340.Google Scholar
Ross, T.P. (2003). The reliability of cluster and switch scores for the Controlled Oral Word Association Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18, 153–164.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1982). Symbol Digit Modalities Test Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
Squire, L.R. & Zouzounis, J.A. (1988). Self-ratings of memory dysfunction: Different findings in depression and amnesia. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 727–738.Google Scholar
Stewart, A., Bielajew, C., Collins, B., Parkinson, M., & Tomiak, E. (2006). A meta-analysis of the neuropsychological effects of adjuvant chemotherapy treatment in women treated for breast cancer. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20, 76–89.Google Scholar
Tchen, N., Juffs, H.G., Downie, F.P., Yi, Q.L., Hu, H., Chemerynsky, I., Clemons, M., Crump, M., Goss, P.E., Warr, D., Tweedale, M.E., & Tannock, I.F. (2003). Cognitive function, fatigue, and menopausal symptoms in women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 21, 4175–4183.Google Scholar
Tombaugh, T.N. & McIntyre, N.J. (1992). The Mini-Mental State Examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 922–935.Google Scholar
Tulsky, D., Zhu, J., & Ledbetter, M. (1997). WAIS-III and WMS-III Technical Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Uchiyama, C.L., D'Elia, L.F., Dellinger, A.M., Becker, J.T., Selnes, O.A., Wesch, J.E., Chen, B.B., Satz, P., van Gorp, W., & Miller, E.N. (1995). Alternate forms of the Auditory-Verbal Learning Test: Issues of test comparability, longitudinal reliability, and moderating demographic variables. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 133–145.Google Scholar
van Dam, F.S.A.M., Schagen, S.B., Muller, M.J., Boogerd, W., v.d. Wall, E., Droogleever Fortuyn, M.E., & Rodenhuis, S. (1998). Impairment of cognitive function in women receiving adjuvant treatment for high-risk breast cancer: High-dose versus standard-dose chemotherapy. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90, 210–218.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation.
Wefel, J.S., Lenzi, R., Theriault, R.L., Davis, R.N., & Meyers, C.A. (2004). The cognitive sequelae of standard-dose adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast carcinoma: Results of a prospective, randomized, longitudinal trial. Cancer, 100, 2292–2299.Google Scholar
Welsh, K.A., Breitner, J.C.S., & Magruder-Habib, K.M. (1993). Detection of dementia in the elderly using the Telephone Screening of Cognitive Status. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology, and Behavioral Neurology, 6, 103–110.Google Scholar
Zakzanis, K., Leach, L., & Kaplan, E. (1999). Neuropsychological differential diagnosis. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.