Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T00:00:57.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive but Not Affective Theory of Mind Deficits in Progressive MS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 June 2019

Katie Lancaster Open the ORCID record for Katie Lancaster [Opens in a new window] ,
Eric M. Stone  and
Helen M. Genova
Katie Lancaster
Affiliation:
Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA Rutgers-NJ Medical School, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Newark, NJ, USA
Eric M. Stone
Affiliation:
Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA
Helen M. Genova*
Affiliation:
Kessler Foundation, West Orange, NJ, USA Rutgers-NJ Medical School, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Newark, NJ, USA
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Helen M. Genova, 120 Eagle Rock Avenue, Suite 100, East Hanover, NJ 07936-3147, USA, Ph: 973-324-3890. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

Social cognitive deficits are an important consequence of multiple sclerosis (MS), yet our understanding of how these deficits manifest in progressive MS is currently limited. To this end, we examined theory of mind (ToM) ability in a sample of individuals with progressive MS using an ecologically valid virtual assessment tool that allows for delineation of cognitive ToM (inferring thoughts and intentions of others) from affective ToM (inferring emotions of others).

Methods & Results:

We compared 15 individuals with progressive MS and 15 healthy controls on their ToM ability using the Virtual Assessment of Mentalising Ability. We found that, relative to healthy controls, participants with progressive MS were impaired in cognitive ToM, but not in affective ToM. Furthermore, we found that the MS participants’ deficits in cognitive ToM were mediated by their general cognitive ability such that poor cognitive ToM ability in MS was explained by poor performance on tests of memory and processing speed.

Conclusions:

Our findings demonstrate that ToM deficits in progressive MS may be limited to cognitive ToM, while affective ToM is conserved. This could be attributable to the MS-related deficits in general cognitive ability, which appear to negatively affect only the cognitive component of ToM.

Keywords

Multiple sclerosisSocial cognitionProgressive MSTheory of mindEcological validityDeficitsMSVirtual reality
Type
Brief Communication
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 25 , Issue 8 , September 2019 , pp. 896 - 900
Copyright
Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2019. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abu-Akel, A. & Shamay-Tsoory, S. (2011). Neuroanatomical and neurochemical bases of theory of mind. Neuropsychologia, 49(11), 2971–2984. Doi: 10.1016/J.NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA.2011.07.012 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-cohen, S., Riordan, M.O., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). A new test of social sensitivity: detection of faux pas in normal children and children with asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(5), 407–418. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-802169-9.00012-4 10.1023/A:1023035012436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batista, S., Freitas, S., Afonso, A., Macário, C., Sousa, L., Cunha, L., & Santana, I. (2018). Theory of mind and executive functions are dissociated in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 33(5), 541–551. Doi: 10.1093/arclin /acx101 10.1093/arclin/acx101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, R.H., Amato, M.P., Boringa, J., Brochet, B., Foley, F., Fredrikson, S., Hamalainen, P., Hartung, H., Krupp, L., Penner, I., Reder, A.T. & Langdon, D. (2012). Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS): international standards for validation. BMC Neurology, 12(1), 55. Doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-55 10.1186/1471-2377-12-55CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, R.H.B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., Dobraski, M., & Shpritz, B. (1996). Revision of the brief visuospatial memory test: Studies of normal performance, reliability, and validity. Psychological Assessment, 8(2), 145.10.1037/1040-3590.8.2.145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canty, A.L., Neumann, D.L., Fleming, J., & Shum, D.H.K. (2017). Evaluation of a newly developed measure of theory of mind: the virtual assessment of mentalising ability. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 27(5), 834–870. Doi: 10.1080/09602011.2015.1052820 10.1080/09602011.2015.1052820CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chalah, M.A. & Ayache, S.S. (2017). Deficits in social cognition: an unveiled signature of multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23(3), 266–286. Doi: 10.1017/S1355617716001156 10.1017/S1355617716001156CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ciampi, E., Uribe-San-Martin, R., Vásquez, M., Ruiz-Tagle, A., Labbe, T., Cruz, J.P., Lillo, P., Slachevsky, A., Reyes, D., Reyes, A., & Cárcamo-Rodríguez, C. (2018). Relationship between social cognition and traditional cognitive impairment in progressive multiple sclerosis and possible implicated neuroanatomical regions. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 20, 122–128. Doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.01.013 10.1016/j.msard.2018.01.013CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cotter, J., Firth, J., Enzinger, C., Kontopantelis, E., Yung, A.R., Elliott, R., & Drake, R.J. (2016). Social cognition in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. Doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003236 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003236CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delis, D., Dean, C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. (2000). California verbal learning test, second edition (CVLT-II). Psychological Corporation. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
Genova, H.M., Cagna, C.J., Chiaravalloti, N.D., Deluca, J., & Lengenfelder, J. (2015). Dynamic assessment of social cognition in individuals with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 22(1), 83–88. Doi: 10.1017/S1355617715001137 10.1017/S1355617715001137CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hauser, S.L., Dawson, D.M., Lehrich, J.R., Beal, M.F., Kevy, S.V., Propper, R.D., … Weiner, H.L. (1983). Intensive immunosuppression in progressive multiple sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 308(4), 173–180. Doi: 10.1056/NEJM198301273080401 10.1056/NEJM198301273080401CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, A., Bakchine, S., Maarouf, A., Chaunu, M.P., Rumbach, L., Magnin, E., … Montreuil, M. (2015). Facial emotion recognition and faux pas interpretation in multiple sclerosis. Brain Impairment, 16(3), 158–172. Doi: 10.1017/BrImp.2015.33 10.1017/BrImp.2015.33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, A., Tourbah, A., Chaunu, M.-P., Bakchine, S., & Montreuil, M. (2017). Social cognition abilities in patients with different multiple sclerosis subtypes. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 23(08), 653–664. Doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000510 10.1017/S1355617717000510CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higginson, C.I., Arnett, P.A., & Voss, W.D. (2000). The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(3), 185–204. Doi: 10.1093/arclin /15.3.185 10.1093/arclin/15.3.185CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isernia, S., Baglio, F., d’Arma, A., Groppo, E., Marchetti, A., & Massaro, D. (2019). Social mind and long-lasting disease: focus on affective and cognitive theory of mind in multiple sclerosis. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 218. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00218 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00218CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kollndorfer, K., Krajnik, J., Woitek, R., Freiherr, J., Prayer, D., & Schöpf, V. (2013). Altered likelihood of brain activation in attention and working memory networks in patients with multiple sclerosis: an ALE meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37(10), 2699–2708. Doi: 10.1016/J.NEUBIOREV.2013.09.005 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.09.005CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mike, A., Strammer, E., Aradi, M., Orsi, G., Perlaki, G., Hajnal, A., … Illes, Z. (2013). Disconnection mechanism and regional cortical atrophy contribute to impaired processing of facial expressions and theory of mind in multiple sclerosis: a structural MRI study. PLoS One, 8(12), e82422. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082422 10.1371/journal.pone.0082422CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phillips, L.H., Henry, J.D., Scott, C., Summers, F., Whyte, M., & Cook, M. (2011). Specific impairments of emotion perception in multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 25(1), 131–136. Doi: 10.1037/a0020752 10.1037/a0020752CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preacher, K.J. & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. Doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raimo, S., Trojano, L., Pappacena, S., Alaia, R., Spitaleri, D., Grossi, D., & Santangelo, G. (2017). Neuropsychological correlates of theory of mind deficits in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuropsychology, 31(7), 811–821. Doi: 10.1037/neu0000372 10.1037/neu0000372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roca, M., Manes, F., Gleichgerrcht, E., Ibáñez, A., González de Toledo, M.E., Marenco, V., Bruno, D., Torralva, T., & Sinay, V. (2014). Cognitive but not affective theory of mind deficits in mild relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Cognitive And Behavioral Neurology, 27(1), 25–30. Doi: 10.1097/wnn.0000000000000017 10.1097/WNN.0000000000000017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, P.H.R., Spedo, C.T., Barreira, A.A., & Leoni, R.F. (2018). Symbol digit modalities test adaptation for magnetic resonance imaging environment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 20, 136–143. Doi: 10.1016/J.MSARD.2018.01.014 10.1016/j.msard.2018.01.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. (1982). Symbol Digit Modalities Test. 1982. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles. Western Psychological Services Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Thompson, A.J., Banwell, B.L., Barkhof, F., Carroll, W.M., Coetzee, T., Comi, G., Correale, J., Fazekas, F., Filippi, M., Freedman, M.S., Fujihara, K., Galetta, S.L., Hartung, H.P., Kappos, L., Lublin, F.D., Marrie, R.A., Miller, A.E., Miller, D.H., Montalban, X., Mowry, E.M., Sorensen, P.S., Tintoré, M., Traboulsee, A.L., Trojano, M., Uitdehaag, B.M.J., Vukusic, S., Waubant, E., Weinshenker, B.G., Reingold, S.C., & Cohen, J.A. (2018). Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. The Lancet Neurology, 17(2), 162–173. Doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed