87 Not Normal but not MCI: Course of Memory over time

Abstract

Objective:

A diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) requires memory complaint and objective memory impairment. However, some individuals report subjective memory complaints (SMC) despite having intact memory performance, while others demonstrate subtle impairment on memory testing but have no memory complaints; neither case would meet criteria for MCI. This study aimed to compare memory performances over time in individuals who do not meet traditional MCI criteria to those with normal cognition and those who converted to MCI.

Participants and Methods:

Diagnoses for a longitudinal sample from the Texas Alzheimer’s Research and Care Consortium were reviewed by a consensus panel of neuropsychologists and neurologists and reclassified at time of last visit. Diagnostic categories included SMC (i.e., memory complaint but no impairment on testing), objective cognitive impairment but no complaint (Impaired but not MCI), normal control (NC), MCI, and dementia. In this study, 827 participants were divided into 4 groups: 1) NC over 5 visits (n=511, 71% female; 42% Latinx/Hispanic), 2) baseline NC to amnestic MCI (n=62; 63% female; 57% Latinx/Hispanic), 3) SMC at last visit (n=133; 58% female; 70% Latinx/Hispanic), and 4) impaired but not MCI at last visit (n=121; 71% female; 60% Latinx/Hispanic). A memory composite (z-score) was created from the CERAD list-learning task (immediate, delayed, and recognition-discrimination) and Wechsler Memory Scale (Immediate and Delayed Logical Memory and Visual Reproduction) to evaluate memory performance over time. A linear mixed-model adjusting for age, education, sex, ethnicity, and number of APOE e4 alleles evaluated memory performance across 5 visits for the groups. To assess if depression followed a similar course, a linear mixed-model evaluated Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores over time.

Results:

At baseline, groups differed by age (F=22.82; p<.001), education (F=8.60; p<.001), MMSE scores (F=9.38; p<.001), GDS-30 scores (F=3.56; p=.015), and memory composites (F=24.29; p<.001). A significant group X time interaction was observed (F=4.83, p<.001). Memory performance improved in both the SMC and the NC groups, remained stable in the impaired but not MCI group, and declined (as expected) in those who converted to amnestic MCI. Depression scores also showed a significant group X time interaction (F=2.43; p=.004), in which the NC to MCI group endorsed slightly more depression symptoms over time, while other groups declined or remained stable.

Conclusions:

Memory trajectories in this diverse sample differed across groups. Individuals with SMC but without objective memory impairment and normal controls showed some improvement in memory over time, presumably due to practice effects. Those with subtle memory impairments but no complaint (i.e., did not meet MCI criteria) remained stable and those who converted to amnestic MCI had worse memory across time. The stability of memory performances in the impaired not MCI group suggests these subtle memory inefficiencies may be longstanding or unperceived. However, because our sample achieved retrospective diagnoses of SMC and impaired not MCI, it will be important for future studies to prospectively follow these groups to determine which risk factors may predict progression to MCI and what impact ethnicity may have on these trajectories.