Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T23:34:02.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A market equilibrium model for the management of ordinary share portfolios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

Extract

1.1 The price of a particular ordinary share represents an equilibrium position between the views of those participants in the market who wish to buy and those who wish to sell. Most participants, and certainly all institutional investors, have access to a vast amount of background information, and share prices adjust continuously as these participants revise their buying or selling prices in the light of new information or in the light of a changed interpretation of existing information. If an explicit price model can be developed solely from the principle that prices are in equilibrium once all participants in the market have acted on their interpretation of the information available to them, this model will be of considerable assistance in the management of ordinary share portfolios.

1.2 This paper describes the construction and application of such a price model and discusses the optimal extent to which mathematical and statistical methods can be employed in portfolio management. A recent paper by Clarkson (1980) describes the stage of development that had been reached at the end of 1978; the present paper expands on the underlying concept of market equilibrium and on the practical implications for the management of institutional portfolios of ordinary shares.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, F. (1976). The Investment Policy Spectrum: Individuals, Endowment Funds and Pension Funds. The Financial Analysts Journal, XXXII, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, R. S. (1978). A Mathematical Model for the Gilt-edged Market. T.F.A. 36, 85.Google Scholar
Clarkson, R. S. (1980). A Market Equilibrium Model for the Selection of Ordinary Shares for Insurance Funds. Transactions of 21st ICA.Google Scholar
Cootner, P. H. (ed.) The Random Character of Stork Market Prices. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, XXV, 383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fama, E. F., Fisher, L., Jensen, M. & Roll, R. (1969). The Adjustment of Stock Prices to New Information. International Economic Review, X, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, M. (1968). The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945–64. The Journal of Finance, XXIII, 389.Google Scholar
Jewell, W. S. (1980). Generalized Models of the Insurance Business: Report of Introduction. Transactions of 21st ICA.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1936). The General Theory of Employment. Interest & Money. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Lorie, J. & Brealey, R. (ed.). (1978). Modern Developments in Investment Management: A Book of Readings. 2nd edn. Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, VII, 77.Google Scholar
Miller, M. H. & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares. The Journal of Business, XXXIV, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plymen, J. & Prevett, R. M. (1972). The Computer for Investment Research. T.F.A. 33, 143.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F. (1972). Risk, Market Sensitivity and Diversification. The Financial Analysts Journal, XXVIII, 74.Google Scholar
Weaver, D. & Hall, M. G. (1967). The Evaluation of ordinary Shares using a Computer. J.I.A. 93, 165.Google Scholar