Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:51:40.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Demutualisation of a United Kingdom mutual life insurance company

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2012

P. D. Needleman  and
G. Westall
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper firstly examines the way in which U.K. mutuals operate and the forces which are leading mutuals to consider demutualisation. Demutualisation is normally accomplished by a Scheme of Transfer under Section 49 of the Insurance Companies Act 1982. The role of the directors and actuaries is discussed, including the impact of the Institute's latest Guidance Note (GN15).

The protection of policyholders' reasonable expectations, the value of membership rights and the basis of dealing with any orphan surplus are the central problems. The paper examines them in the context of both the open fund and closed fund situation and shows how they may be resolved.

A simple model is used to project the financial position of both an open and closed fund in a demutualised company. The relative advantages and disadvantages of each indicate that different courses of action may be appropriate for mutuals in differing financial positions.

Keywords

MutualTransfersMergers and AcquisitionsSurplus
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries , Volume 118 , Issue 3 , 1991 , pp. 321 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Franklin, N.A.M. & Lee, W.E. (1988). Demutualisation. J.S.S. 31, 89.Google Scholar
(2) Field, M.H., Needleman, P.D., Campbell-Smith, W. & Sheddin, A.D. (1991). Demutualisation. T.F.A. 42, II.Google Scholar
(3) Faculty of Actuaries Bonus and Valuation Research Group. (1991). Restructuring Mutuals—Principles and Practice. T.F.A. 43, II.Google Scholar
(4) Pell, M. (1991). Section 49 Transfers. Staple Inn Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
(5) Leckie, R.B. (1979). Some Actuarial Considerations for Mutual Companics. T.S.A. 31, 187.Google Scholar
(6) Smart, L.C. (1977). Pricing and Profitability in a Life Office. J.I.A. 104, 125.Google Scholar
(7) Bunch, T.S. (1988). The Valualion of With-Profits Business and the Estate. J.S.S. 31, 59.Google Scholar
(8) Joint Institute/Faculty Working Party on Polichyholders' Reasonable Expectations. (1990). Report.Google Scholar
(9) Task Force on Mutual Life Insurance Company Conversion. (1987). Report. T.S.A. 39, 295.Google Scholar
(10) Burrows, R.P. & Whitehead, G.H.(1987). The Detenmination of Life Office Appraisal Values. J.I.A. 114, 411.Google Scholar