Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T18:05:15.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Actuarial Assessment of Damages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

J. H. Prevett
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The purpose of this paper is to provide an opportunity for discussion within our profession of ‘the use of an actuarial approach and actuarial evidence’ in the assessment of damages arising out of personal injury and fatal accident litigation. The need for such a paper was intimated in the pages of our Journal by William Phillips in his Review of Principles of the Law of Damages by Professor Harry Street. Since the publication of what Phillips described as ‘from the actuarial point of view…the most important legal textbook which has been published in the last 50 years’ the employment of actuaries in this field has been widely discussed within the legal profession. The most important recent development has been the inclusion of personal injury litigation as Item VI of the first programme of the Law Commission set up by the Law Commission Act, 1965. The words quoted in the first sentence above are taken from the list of ‘Questions for Examination’ under (b) of Item VI, ‘Assessment of Damages’. The current examination being conducted by the Law Commission makes this a particularly appropriate time for a sessional meeting on this subject. The writer has had the advantage of a sight of a preliminary Working Paper prepared by the Law Commission and will be quoting certain extracts from that paper below. It must however be stressed that the Working Paper is a preliminary one which attempts to do no more than canvass views: it in no way sets out the conclusions of the Law Commission on the matters discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Institute of Actuaries , Volume 94 , Issue 3 , December 1968 , pp. 293 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Phillips, William, Review of (2), J.I.A. 1962, 88, 253.Google Scholar
(2) ProfessorStreet, Harry. Principles of the Law of Damages. Sweet & Maxwell (1962).Google Scholar
(3) Law Commission: Preliminary Working Paper: First programme, Item VI (b.) Personal Injury Litigation, Assessment of Damages.Google Scholar
(4) Livingstone v. Rawyards Coal Company (1880) 5 A.C. 25 at 39.Google Scholar
(5) British Transport Commission v. Gourley [1955] 3 All E.R. 796.Google Scholar
(6) McDonald v. McDonald (1880) 5 A.C. 519.Google Scholar
(7) Dawson, , Miles, M., A.I.A. Valuation, in actions for Damages for Negligence, of human life, destroyed or impaired. Proc. 4th Int. Congress of Actuaries (1904). Vol. I, p. 929.Google Scholar
(8) Phillips, , , William. What is this thing called e? Solicitors Journal, Vol. 109, 722 (1965).Google Scholar
(9) Pope v. D. Murphy & Son Limited [1963] 2 W.L.R. 861.Google Scholar
(10) Roach v. Yates [1937] 3 All E.R. 442.Google Scholar
(11) Munkman, John. Damages for Personal Injuries and Death. 3rd Ed. Butterworths (1966).Google Scholar
(12) Everett, , Marven, R., Q.C. Damages for Death and Personal Injuries. Law Guardian (Nov. 1965).Google Scholar
(13) Hodges v. Harland & Wolff Limited [1965] 1 W.L.R. 526.Google Scholar
(14) Money v. Woodfield [1964] W.L.R. 16.Google Scholar
(15) Report by Justice. Trial of Motor Accident Cases. Stevens & Sons (1966).Google Scholar
(16) Kemp, and Kemp, . The Quantum of Damages, Vol. I, 3rd Ed. (1967).Google Scholar
(17) Ogden, Sydney N. The Value of Actuarial Testimony in the Courts. T.A.S.A. Vol. VI (1899), p. 48.Google Scholar
(18) Anderson, L. A. Expectation of Life and other Fallacies. Record of the American Institute of Actuaries (1921), p. 39.Google Scholar
(19) Shannon, S. Admissibility of Mortality Tables in Evidence in Court Cases. Record of the American Institute of Actuaries (1938), p. 145.Google Scholar
(20) Smith, Thomas C. and Griffin, Frank L. Work Life Expectancy, as a measure of Damages. T.S.A. (1953) No. 1, p. 585.Google Scholar
(21) Traversi, A. T. Actuaries and the Courts. Australian Law Journal Vol. 29 (1956).Google Scholar
(22) Howroyd, R. and Howroyd, Florence J. The Assessment of Compensation for Loss of Support. 75, South African Law Journal, p. 65 (1958).Google Scholar
(23) Gollan v. Duncan (1960) N. 2. L.R. 60.Google Scholar
(24) Bold v. Brough, Nicholson & Hall Limited [1963] 3 All E.R. 854.Google Scholar
(25) Dworkin, , , Gerald. Damages and Tax—A Comparative Survey. British Tax Review (1967).Google Scholar
(26) ‘Barfia’. Periodical Damages for Loss of Earning Capacity. Solicitors' Journal Vol. 109, 1002 (1965).Google Scholar
(27) Phillips, , , William. Motor Insurance Premiums are too Cheap. Policy (Jan. 1967).Google Scholar
(28) Watson v. Powles [1967] 3 W.L.R. 1364.Google Scholar
(29) Samuels, , , Alec. Assessment of Damages. Solicitors' Journal Vol. 109, 483 (1965).Google Scholar