Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T10:17:37.782Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some Reasons for thinking the System of Reassurance undesirable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Benjamin Newbatt Esq.*
Affiliation:
Clerical, Medical, and General Life Assurance Society

Extract

It has become the practice of late years for Assurance Companies, when applied to for a policy of very large amount, to issue such an one as is required and to reduce the risk within the limits they have prescribed for themselves by effecting reassurances of portions of it with other Companies. The only alternative proceeding would of course be to issue a policy for the amount to which the Company limits itself, and to leave the applicant to effect the remainder of his proposed assurance where he may. Mr. Newbatt's paper, which, as having reference to a matter of official practice merely, is not inserted here, advocates the latter mode of procedure in preference to the former, and adduces a variety of arguments in support of that view.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1866

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)