Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:21:55.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

WILLIAM PETTY, NICHOLAS BARBON, MULTIPLES, AND A NEW HYPOTHESIS OF INEVITABLE DISCOVERY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2009

JAMES H. ULLMER
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 31 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 341 - 359
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amati, Frank and Aspromourgos, Tony. 1985. “Petty Contra Hobbes: A Previously Untranslated Manuscript.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 46 (January): 127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appleby, Joyce Oldham. 1978. Economic Thought and Idealogy in Seventeenth Century England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barbon, Nicholas. 1685. An Apology for the Builder, or A Discourse Shewing the Cause and Effects of the Increase of Building. In Early English Books, 1641–1700. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1990.Google Scholar
Barbon, Nicholas. 1690. A Discourse of Trade. In Early English Books, 1641–1700. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1990.Google Scholar
Barbon, Nicholas. 1695. A Discourse Concerning Coining the New Money Lighter in Answer to Mr. Lock's Consideration about Raising the Value of Money. In Early English Books, 1641–1700. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms, 1990.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1962. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 1. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand. 1982. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century, Volume II, The Wheels of Commerce, English translation. New York: Harper and Row, 1979.Google Scholar
Brems, Hans. 1986. Pioneering Economic Theory, 1630–1980: A Mathematical Restatement. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, John. 1989. The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Bronowski, Jacob. 1974. The Ascent of Man. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Chalk, Alfred F. 1951. “Natural Law and the Rise of Economic Individualism in England.” Journal of Political Economy, 59, Number (4) (August): 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Edmund. 1895. The Life of Sir William Petty. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas. 1983. “Herman Heinrich Gossen: His Life and Works in Historical Perspective.” In The Laws of Human Relations and the Rules of Human Action Derived Therefrom, by Heinrich Gossen, Herman, translated by Blitz, Rudolph C.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. xi–cxlix.Google Scholar
Grampp, William D. 1952. “The Liberal Elements in English Mercantilism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66, Number (4) (November): 465–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heckscher, Eli F. 1955. Mercantilism, 2 Volumes, edited by Soderlund, E. F.. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hill, Christopher. 1980. The Century of Revolution 1603–1714, 2nd edition. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1651. The Leviathan, edited by Rhys, Ernest. London: J.M. Dent, 1931.Google Scholar
Horsefield, J. Keith. 1960. British Monetary Experiments 1650–1710. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, Charles Henry. 1899. “Introduction.” In The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. xiii–xci.Google Scholar
Jensen, Hans E. 1976. “Sources and Contours of Adam Smith's Conceptualized Reality in the Wealth of Nations.” Review of Social Economy, 34 (December): 259–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Hans E. 1983. “J. M. Keynes as a Marshallian.” Journal of Economic Issues, 17 (March): 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. A. J. 1937. Predecessors of Adam Smith. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kecskemeti, Paul. 1952. “Introduction.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by Kecskemeti, Paul. London: Routledge and Paul, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Letwin, William. 1963. The Origins of Scientific Economics: English Economic Thought 1660–1776. Reprint. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Lewis, Arthur R. 1954. “Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor.” Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 22: 139–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 1994. Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Karl. 1936. Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, translated by Wirth, Louis and Shills, Edward. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1867. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. I, translated by Moore, S. and Aveling, E., edited by Engels, Friedrich. New York: International Publishers, 1967.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert K. 1973. The Sociology of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Niehans, Jurg. 1995. “Multiple Discoveries in Economic Theory.” The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 2 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogburn, William F. and Thomas, Dorothy S.. 1922. “Are Inventions Inevitable?” Political Science Quarterly 37 (March): 83–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patinkin, Don. 1982. Anticipations of the General Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Patinkin, Don. 1983. “Multiple Discoveries and the Central Message.” American Journal of Sociology, 89 (September): 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, Sir William. 1662. A Treatise of Taxes and Contributions. In The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Vol. I, Hull, C. H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899, pp. 1–97.Google Scholar
Petty, Sir William. 1683. Another Essay in Political Arithmetic Concerning the Growth of the City of London. In The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Vol. II, Hull, C. H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899, pp. 451–478.Google Scholar
Petty, Sir William. 1690. Political Arithmetic. In The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Vol. I, Hull, C. H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899, pp. 233–313.Google Scholar
Petty, Sir William. 1691a. Verbum Sapienti. Reprinted in The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Vol. I, C. H. Hull, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899, pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
Petty, Sir William. 1691b. The Political Anatomy of Ireland. In The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Vol. I, Hull, C. H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899. pp. 121–231.Google Scholar
Petty, Sir William. 1695. Quantulumcunque Concerning Money. In The Economic Writings of Sir William Petty, Vol. II, Hull, C. H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899, pp. 437–448.Google Scholar
Petty, Sir William. 1927. The Petty Papers, 2 Volumes, edited from the Bowood Papersby the Marquis of Landsdowne. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl. 1983. A History of Economic Reasoning. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1988. “Understanding the Merton Thesis.” Isis, 79 (4) (December): 594–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1958. The Society of Knowledge: An Essay in Aid of a Deeper Understanding of the History of Ideas. London: Routledge and Paul.Google Scholar
Ullmer, James H. 2004. “The Macroeconomic Thought of Sir William Petty.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 26 (3) (September): 401–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar