Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:49:52.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Wicksellian Unanimity Rule: The Competing Interpretations of Buchanan and Musgrave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Marianne Johnson
Marianne Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Swart Hall, 800 Algoma Blvd., University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, WI 54901. Phone: (920) 424-2230. Fax: (920) 424-1734. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The disparate approaches of James Buchanan and Richard Musgrave to public economics are both anchored in Knut Wicksell's contribution to the theory of public goods. In “A New Principle of Just Taxation,” the second essay of Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen (1896 [1994]), Wickseil considered how to design a voting mechanism to finance public goods and assure a just distribution of the tax burden. Applying the benefit principle to taxation, Wicksell argued that a unanimity-voting rule would guarantee that all individuals receive benefits commensurate to their tax cost from any public good. “No one can complain if he secures a benefit which he himself considers to be (greater or at least) as great as the price he has to pay” (Wicksell 1994, p. 79). Wicksell's primary interest was not in determining the appropriate mix of public and private, instead he demonstrated how one might finance public expenditures provided the decision of the mix has already been made. The actual voting mechanism is much less controversial than the philosophy and antecedent assumptions behind the process. While Musgrave and Buchanan share common ground, agreeing to the originality of Wicksell's work, and the necessity of considering the rules by which social decisions are made, their views on Wicksell are generally acknowledged to be radically different (Bernd Hansjurgens 1999, Pieter Hennipman 1982, David Riesman 1990).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 57 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, A. B. (1987) The Collected Papers of Richard A. Musgrave: A Review Article, Journal of Public Economics, 33 (08), pp. 389–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, R. (2001) On the Credentials of Methodological Pluralism, in: Biddle, Jeffrey, Davis, John, and Medema, Steven (Eds) Economics Broadly Considered: Essays in Honor of Warren J. Samuels (New York: Routledge), pp. 159–69.Google Scholar
Blankart, C. (1998) Was Knut Wicksell a Conservative or a Radical? Public Choice, 94 (03), pp. 355–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1949) The Pure Theory of Government Finance, A Suggested Approach, Journal of Political Economy, 57 (12), pp. 496–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1951) Knut Wicksell on Marginal Cost Pricing, Southern Economic Journal, 28 (10), pp. 173–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1952) Wicksell on Fiscal Reform: A Comment, American Economic Review, 42 (09), pp. 599–602.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1967) Public Finance in a Democratic Process (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press).Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1968) The Demand and Supply of Public Goods (Chicago: Rand McNally).Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1987) The Constitution of Economic Policy, American Economic Review, 77 (06), pp. 243–50.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1989) Explorations into Constitutional Economics (College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press).Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1991) The Economics and the Ethics of Constitutional Order (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1992) Better than Plowing and Other Personal Essays (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1998) Agreement and Efficiency: Response to Guttman, European Journal of Political Economy, 14 (05), pp. 209–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, J. M. (1999) Origins, Experience, and Ideas: A Retrospective Assessment,” in: Sinn, Hans Werner (Ed) Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), pp. 11–28, and discussion, pp. 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, I. M. and Samuels, W. I. (1980) On Some Fundamental Issues in Political Economy: An Exchange of Correspondence, in: Samuels, Warren I. (Ed) Methodology of Economic Thought (New Brunswick, NI: Transaction Books), pp. 517–40.Google Scholar
Gardlund, T. (1996) The Life of Knut Wickseil (Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansjurges, B. (2000) The Influence of Knut Wicksell on Richard Musgrave and lames Buchanan, Public Choice, 103 (April), pp. 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennipman, P. (1982) Wicksell and Pareto: Their Relationship in the Theory of Public Finance, History of Political Economy, 14 (Spring), pp. 37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H.-Cr. G. (1994) The Impact of the Scandinavian Controversy About lust Taxation on Public Choice: a Late Homage to Einar Einarson, Public Choice, 81 (12), pp. 323–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, E. (1919) Die Gerechtigkeit Besteuerung (Lund, Sweden).Google Scholar
Medema, S. G. (2005) “Marginalizing” Government: From la scienza delle finanze to Wicksell, History of Political Economy, 37 (Spring), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Medema, S. G. and, Zerbe, R. O. (2000) Educating Alice: Lessons from the Coase Theorem, Research in Law and Economics, 19, pp. 69–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, Richard (1939) The Voluntary Exchange Theory of Public Economy, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53 (02), pp. 213–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1941) The Planning Approach in Public Economy: A Reply, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 55 (02), pp. 319–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1959) The Theory of Public Finance (New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.).Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1970) Allocation and Distribution, and the Theory of Public Finance, in: Haller, H. (Ed) Theorie und Praxis des Finanzpolitischen Interventionismus (Tubingen: I. C. B. Moltr), pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1986a) A Brief History of Fiscal Doctrine, Public Finance in a Democratic Society: Collected Papers, Vol. 2 (New York: New York University Press), pp. 338–93.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1986b) Public Finance, Now and Then, Public Finance in a Democratic Society: Collected Papers, Vol. 1 (New York: New York University Press), pp. 89–107.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1997) Devolution, Grants, and Fiscal Competition, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (Autumn), pp. 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, R. (1999) The Nature of the Fiscal State: The Roots of My Thinking, in Sinn, Hans Werner (Ed) Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press), pp. 29–50, and discussion pp. 51–62.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. and Peacock, A. (1958) Introduction, in: Musgrave, and Peacock, (Eds) Classics in the Theory of Public Finance (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1994), pp. i–xxi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palley, T. (1997) The Academic Jungle: Social Practice and the Survival of Economic Ideas, Review of Radical Political Economics, 29 (Summer), pp. 22–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisman, D. (1990) The Political Economy of James Buchanan (London: Macmillan Press, Ltd).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, W. J. (1974) The History of Economic Thought as Intellectual History, History of Political Economy, 6 (Summer), pp. 305–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, W. J. (2000) Buchanan and Musgrave on Public Finance and Public Choice: A Review Essay, Journal of History of Economic Thought, 22 (Fall), pp. 499–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandelin, B. (1988) Buchanan, Wicksell, and Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen, History of Economics Society Bulletin, 10 (Fall), pp. 169–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandelin, B. (1997) Introduction, in Sandelin, (Ed) Knut Wicksell: Selected Essays in Economics, Vol. 1 (New York: Routledge), pp. vii–xiii.Google Scholar
Sinn, H. W. (1999) Introduction, in: Sinn, (Ed) Public Finance and Public Choice: Two Contrasting Visions of the State (Cambridge: The MIT Press), pp. 3–10.Google Scholar
Stigler, G. and Friedlund, C. (1975) The Citation Practices of Doctorates in Economics, Journal of Political Economy, 83 (06), pp. 477–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhr, C. (1951) Knut Wicksell—A Centennial Evaluation, American Economic Review, 41 (12), pp. 829–60.Google Scholar
Uhr, C. (1962) The Economic Doctrines of Knut Wicksell (Los Angeles: University of California Press).Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1896) Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen (Jena, Germany: Gustav Fisher).Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1994) A New Principle of Just Taxation, translated by Buchanan, James, in: Musgrave, Richard and Peacock, Alan (Eds) Classics in the Theory of Public Finance (New York: Macmillan and Company), pp. 72–118.Google Scholar
Wicksell, K. (1997) A Few Comments, translated by Chamberlain, Timothy, in: Sandelin, Bo (Ed) Knut Wicksell: Selected Essays in Economics, Vol. 1 (London: Routledge), pp. 240–52.Google Scholar