Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:24:15.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Was George Stigler Adam Smith's Best Friend? Studying the History of Economic Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Craig Freedman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

At times economists seem to treat research into the history of their profession as a guilty pleasure, equating it with “the love that dares not speak its name,” to steal an expression from Oscar Wilde. As a field of research it retains at best an equivocal position. Should real economists waste their time amusing themselves with such a completely irrelevant and non-applicable field? This, at best, ambivalent attitude by a clear majority of the profession meant that the establishment of the first journal dedicated to this area of endeavor (History of Political Economy) served as the eagerly awaited signal for the most prestigious general journals to stop publishing articles of this nature. By the 1970s, the subject's relegation to the backwaters of the discipline translated into a generalized move to drop history of economic thought (as well as economic history) as a requirement of graduate education:

the history of thought, like all other fields, is well enough served by its own specialists. These were the reasons why Stigler proposed and supported the decision of the Economics Department at the University of Chicago to abandon its history of thought requirement in 1972, before many other departments did (Rosen 1993, p. 811).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 213 - 228
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coase, Ronald (1994) Adam Smith's View of Man, in: Essays on Economics and Economists (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 95–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Howard S. (Ed.) (1948) A Survey of Contemporary Economics (Philadelphia: Blakiston Co).Google Scholar
Freedman, Craig (1993) Why Economists Can't Read, Methodus [Journal of Economic Methodology], 5 (1), pp. 6–23.Google Scholar
Freedman, Craig (1998) Countervailing Egos: Galbraith versus Stigler, History of Economics Review, 27 (Winter), pp. 50–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedland, Claire (1993) On Stigler and Stiglerisms, Journal of Political Economy, 101 (5), pp. 780–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. (2001) How Economics Forgot History: The Problem of Historical Specificity in Social Science (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard (1973) The Collected Works of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. XIII (London: MacMillan).Google Scholar
Knight, Frank H. (1956) Economics, in: On the History and Method of Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Mackie, Christopher D. (1998) Canonizing Economic Theory (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe).Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred (1922) Principles of Economics (Philadelphia, PA: Porcupine Press, 1982).Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. (1996a) Economic Tourism, Eastern Economic Journal, 22 (3), pp. 365–68.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. (1996b) Economic Tourism, Eastern Economic Journal, 22 (1), pp. 97–100.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald (1976) Does the Past Have Useful Economics? Journal of Economic Literature, 14 (2), pp. 434–61.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald (1985) Economical Writing, Economic Inquiry, 24 (2), pp. 187–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, Donald (1992) Writing as a Responsibility of Science: A Reply to Laband, Economic Inquiry, 30 (4), pp. 689–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrattan, Ellen R. and Prescott, Edward C. (2004) The 1929 Stock Market: Irving Fisher was Right, International Economic Review, 45 (4), pp. 991–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de (1963) An Apology for Raymond Sebond, in: The Complete Essays of Montaigne, Frame, Donald (Trans) (Stanford: Stanford University Press), pp. 318–457.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sherwin (1993) George J. Stigler and the Industrial Organization of Economic Thought, Journal of Political Economy, 101 (5), pp. 809–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiffman, Daniel A. (2004) Mainstream Economics, Heterodoxy and Academic Exclusion: A Review Essay, European Journal of Political Economy, 20, pp. 1079–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1949) A Review Article on? A Survey of Contemporary Economics, Journal of Political Economy, 57 (2), pp. 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1965a) Preface, in: Essays in the History of Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. v.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1965) The Influence of Events and Policies on Economic Theory? in: Essays in the History of Economics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 16–30.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1971) The Theory of Economic Regulation, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2 (1), pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1982a) The Successes and Failures of Professor Smith, in: The Economist as Preacher (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 146–59.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1982b) The Literature of Economics, in: The Economist as Preacher (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 223–40.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1982c) Preface, in: The Economist as Preacher (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. vii.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1982d) Smith's Travels on the Ship of State, in: The Economist as Preacher (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 136–45.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1982e) Does Economics Have a Useful Past?, in: The Economist as Preacher (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), pp. 107–18.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1988) Memoirs of an Unregulated Economist (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar