Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:39:31.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Walras and the NeoWalrasian Diversion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Manuel Luís Costa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper addresses the question: How did the promising program set out in Leon Walras' mature writings come to be taken as laying the ground for a totally different line of problems in his later writings and in modern microeconomic theory? The study of Walras' mature work (see Walker, 1996) offers an instructive object lesson in the way in which an interesting line of enquiry leads gradually to analytical difficulties and then to “solutions” that evade issues and constitute a major diversion of analysis down roads not initially contemplated by its originator. This paper attempts to trace the development of that detour from the main road of economic analysis in Walras' mature work to the side road of abstract exercises in contemporary neowalrasian literature.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 51 - 69
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arrow, Kenneth J. 1959. “Toward a Theory of Price Adjustment,” in Abramovits, M.et al., eds., The Allocation of Economic Resources. Essays in Honor of Bernard Francis Haley, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 41–51.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1968. “Economic Equilibrium,” International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 4, Macmillan, 376–389.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. 1994. “Methodological Individualism and Social Knowledge,” American Economic Review, 84, no. 2, May, 1–9.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. and Debreu, G.. 1954. “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy,” Econometrica, 22, no. 3, July, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. and Hahn, Frank H.. 1971. General Competitive Analysis, North-Holland, New York.Google Scholar
Clower, Robert W. 1995. “Axiomatics in Economics,” Southern Economic Journal, 62, no. 2, October, 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clower, Robert W. and Peter, Howitt. 1996. “Taking Markets Seriously: Groundwork for a Post-Walrasian Macroeconomics,” in David, Colander, ed. Beyond Microfoundation. Post Walrasian Macroeconomics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clower, Robert W. and Axel, Leijonhufvud. 1975. “The Coordination of Economic Activities: A Keynesian Perspective,” American Economic Review, 65, no. 2, May, 182–188.Google Scholar
Costa, Manuel L. G. 1995. A Critique of Price Theory with Special Reference to Decentralized Exchange, Ph.D. dissertation, University of South Carolina, mimeo.Google Scholar
Debreu, Gerard. 1959. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic of Economic Equilibrium, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1987.Google Scholar
Debreu, Gerard. 1986. “Four Aspects of Mathematical Theory of Economic Analysis,” in Stanley, Reiter, ed. Studies in Mathematical Economics, 25, The Mathematical Association of America, 405–422.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1889. “The Mathematical Theory of Political Economy. Eléments d'Economie Politique Pure. By Léon Walras,” Nature, 40, September 5, 434–446.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1925. “On the Determinateness of Economic Equilibrium,” Papers Relating to Political Economy, 2, Burt Franklin, New York, 313–315.Google Scholar
Fowles, John. 1983. The Tree, The Ecco Press, New York.Google Scholar
Goodwin, R. M. 1951. “Iteration, Automatic Computers, and Economic Dynamics,” Metronomica, 3, 1–7.Google Scholar
Hahn, F. H. 1970. “Some Adjustment Problems,” Econometrica, 38, no. 1, January, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, F. H. 1973. On the Notion of Equilibrium in Economics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1934. “Léon Walras,” Econometrica, 2, October, 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1939. Value and Capital. An Inquiry into some Fundamental Principles of Economic Theory, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1946.Google Scholar
Hicks, John R. 1967. Critical Essays in Monetary Theory, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hirshleifer, Jack. 1973. “Exchange Theory: The Missing Chapter,” Western Economic Journal, 11, no. 2, June, 129–146.Google Scholar
Howitt, Peter W. 1973. “Walras and Monetary Theory,” Western Economic Journal, 11, no. 4, December, 487–499.Google Scholar
Jaffé, William. 1967. “Walras' Theory of Tâtonnement: A Critique of Recent Interpretations,” Journal of Political Economy, 75, no. 1, February, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffé, William. 1980. “Walras's Economics as Others See It,” Journal of Economic Literature, 58, June, 528–549.Google Scholar
Jaffé, William. 1981. “Another Look at Léon Walras's Theory of Tâtonnement,” History of Political Economy, 13, no. 2, 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaldor, Nicholas. 1934. “A Classificatory Note on the Determinateness of Equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies, 1, February, 122–136; as reprinted in Essays on Value and Distribution, Gerald Duckworth, London, 1960, 13–33.Google Scholar
Kohn, Meir. 1995. “Economics as a Theory of Exchange,” discussion paper, mimeo.Google Scholar
Kregel, Jan A. 1992. “Walras' Auctioneer and Marshall's Well-informed Dealers: Time, Market Prices and Normal Supply Prices,” Quaderni di Storia dell'Economia Politica, 10, no. 1, 531–551.Google Scholar
Kregel, Jan A. 1995. “Neoclassical Price Theory, Institutions, and the Evolution of Securities Market Organization,” Economic Journal, 105, March, 459–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, Oscar. 1945. Price Flexibility and Employment, Cowles Commission for Research in Economics, Monograph No. 8, Principii Press of Trinity University, San Antonio.Google Scholar
Manin, Yu I. 1977. A Course in Mathematical Logic, Springer Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morishima, Michio. 1977. Walras' Economics: A Pure Theory of Capital and Money, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pareto, Vilfredo. 1909. Manual of Political Economy, translated by Schwier, A., Augustus M. Kelley, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Patinkin, Don, 1956. Money, Interest and Prices, Row, Evanston.Google Scholar
Patinkin, Don. 1965. Money, Interest and Prices, 2nd ed., Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Slutsky, Eugen E. 1915. “On the Theory of the Budget of the Consumer,” Giornali degli Economisti, as reprinted in Stigler, G. J. and Boulding, K., eds., Readings in Price Theory, Irwin, Chicago and Homewood, 1952, 27–52.Google Scholar
Starr, Ross M. 1971. “Notes on Microeconomic Monetary Theory,” Ph.D. dissertation, chapter 1, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Thornton, Henry, 1802. An Enquiry into the Nature and Effects of the Paper Credit of Great Britain, edited by Hayek, F. A., Frank Cass and Co., London, 1962.Google Scholar
Uzawa, Hirofumi. 1960. “Walras' Tâtonnement in the Theory of Exchange,” Review of Economic Studies, 27, June, 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velupillai, K. 1991. “Formalization, Rigor, Proof, Existence and Axiomatics: Some Subversive Thoughts,” Department of Economics, Politics and Public Administration, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1971. “The Determinateness of Equilibrium in Isolated Competitive Markets,” Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali, 18, no. 12, 1158–1179.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1987a. “Walras's Theory of Tatonnement,” Journal of Political Economy, 95, no. 4, 758–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1987b. “Léon Walras,” in, John, Eatwellet al., eds., The New Palgrove, 4, Macmillan Press Ltd., London, 852–863.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1987c. “Edgeworth versus Walras on the Theory of Tatonnement,” Eastern Economic Journal, 13, no. 2, April, June, 155–165.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1988. “Iteration in Walras's Theory of Tatonnement,” De Economist, 136, no. 3, 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1990a. “Institutions and Participants in Walras's Theory of Oral Pledges Markets,” Révue Economique, 41, no. 4, July 651–668.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1990b. “Disequilibrium and Equilibrium in Walras's Theory of Oral Pledges Markets,” Revue Economique, 41, no. 6, November, 961–978.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1990c. “The Structure of Walras's Barter Model of Written Pledge Markets,” Révue d'Economique Politique, 100, no. 5, 618–641.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1993. “Walras's Models of the Barter of Stocks of Commodities,” European Economic Review, 37, no. 4, 1425–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1994a. “The Structure of Walras's Consumer Commodities Model in the Mature Phase of His Thought,” Revue Economique, 45, no. 2, March, 239–256.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1994b. “The Adjustment Process in Walras's Consumer Commodities Model in the Mature Phase of His Thought,” Revue Economique, 45, no. 6, 1357–1375.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1996. Walras's Market Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Donald A. 1997. “The Relation Between the Nineteenth Century Bourse and Léon Walras's Model of an Organized Market,” conference paper, History of Economics Society, Charleston, South Carolina.Google Scholar
Walras, Léon. 1889. Eléments d'economie politique pure, ou Théorie de la richesse sociale, 2nd ed., Rouge, F., Lausanne; Guillaumin, Paris; Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Walras, Léon. 1895. “Enclosure to Vilfredo Pareto,” January 9, reprinted in Jaffé, W., ed., Correspondence of Léon Walras and Related Papers, 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1965, 623–632.Google Scholar
Walras, Léon. 1900. Eléments d'economie politique pure, ou Théorie de la richesse sociale, 4th ed., Rouge, F., Lausanne; F. Pichon, Paris.Google Scholar
Walras, Léon. 1926. Eléments d'economie politique pure, ou Théorie de la richesse sociale, Comparative edition, prepared by Claude Mouchot, Economica, Paris, 1988.Google Scholar
Walras, Léon. 1954. Elements of Pure Economics, translated by William Jaffé, Orion, Orion Editions, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1991. Stabilizing Dynamics. Constructing Economic Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar