Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T07:49:21.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

W. STARK, J. M. KEYNES, AND THE MERCANTILISTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2021

Constantinos Repapis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper we investigate Werner Stark’s sociology of knowledge approach in the history of economic thought. This paper explores: 1) the strengths and weaknesses of Stark’s approach to historiography, 2) how this can frame an understanding of mercantilist writings, and 3) the development of a link between a pluralist understanding of economics and the sociology of knowledge approach. The reason for developing this link is to extend the sociology of knowledge approach to encompass a pluralist understanding of economic theorizing and, at the same time, clarify the link between context and economic theory. John Maynard Keynes’s practice of building narratives of intellectual traditions as evidenced in The General Theory is used to develop a position between an understanding of history of economic thought as the evolution of abstract and decontextualized economic theorizing and the view of economic theory as relevant only within the social conditions from which it arose.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 27 - 54
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank Geoff Harcourt, Sheila Dow, Ragupathy Venkatachalam, Kumaraswamy (Vela) Velupillai, Maxime Desmarais-Tremblay, Harro Maas, two anonymous referees for valuable feedback, and the participants of the 2019 ESHET session in Lille and the THETS session in Goldsmiths, for helpful comments and discussions. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. Daniele Besomi for clarifications on the Harrod-Keynes correspondence.

References

REFERENCES

Boulding, Kenneth. 1971. “After Samuelson, Who Needs Adam Smith?” History of Political Economy 3 (2): 225–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, Philip W. 1964. The Politics of Mercantilism. New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel. 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clark, Charles M. A. 1994a. “Introduction.” In Stark, Werner, History and Historians of Political Economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers, pp. xiii–xxvi.Google Scholar
Clark, Charles M. A. 1994b. “Werner Stark and the Historiography of Economics.” History of Economic Ideas 2 (2): 97–108.Google Scholar
Clark, Charles M. A. 2001. “Werner Stark and the Sociology of Knowledge Approach to the History of Economics.” In Medema, Steven G. and Samuel, Warren J., eds., Historians of Economics and Economic Thought: The Construction of Disciplinary Memory. London: Routledge, pp. 302–319.Google Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1984. Refugee Scholars in America: Their Impact and their Experiences. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Das, Robin R. 2008. “The Place of Werner Stark in American Sociology: A Study in Marginality.” PhD Thesis. New York, ETD Collection for Fordham University. AAI3301435. https://fordham.bepress.com/dissertations/AAI3301435. Accessed September 1, 2019.Google Scholar
Davenant, Charles. 1942. Two Manuscripts by Charles Davenant. A Reprint of Economic Tracts, edited by Evans, G. Heberton, with an introduction by Usher, Abbott Payson. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, John B. 1994. Keynes’s Philosophical Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetter, Frank A. 1945. “Review of The History of Economics in Its Relation to Social Development by W. Stark.” American Economic Review 35 (5): 945–946.Google Scholar
Heckscher, Eli F. [1935] 1955. Mercantilism. Two volumes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Terence. 1988. Before Adam Smith. The Emergence of Political Economy 1662–1776. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keynes, John M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, John M.. 1987a. The General Theory and After: Part I Preparation. Volume XIII of the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Cambridge: Macmillan and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John M. 1987b. The General Theory and After: Part II Defence and Development. Volume XIV of the Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Cambridge: Macmillan and Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, John E. 1997. “Underconsumption.” In Harcourt, G. C. and Riach, P. A., eds., A ‘Second Edition’ of The General Theory. London: Routledge. pp. 415–429.Google Scholar
Leonard, Eileen B., Strasser, Herman, and Westhues, Kenneth. 1993. In Search of Community. Essays in Memory of Werner Stark, 1910–1985. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Letwin, William. 1963. The Origins of Scientific Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 1994. Mercantilism: The Shaping of an Economic Language. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 2004. The Tradition of Free Trade. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, Lars. 2015. The Political Economy of Mercantilism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, E. Doyle. 1991. “Introduction to the Transactions Edition.” In Stark, W., The Sociology of Knowledge: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the History of Ideas. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, pp. ix–xix.Google Scholar
Perrotta, Cosimo. 1991. “Is the Mercantilist Theory of the Favorable Balance of Trade Really Erroneous?” History of Political Economy 23 (2): 301–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remmling, Gunter W. 1973. Towards the Sociology of Knowledge: Origin and Development of a Sociological Thought Style. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Roll, Eric. 1945. “Review of The History of Economics and Its Relation to Social Development by W. Stark.” Journal of Economic History 5 (2): 252–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schofield, Philip. 2009. “Werner Stark and Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings.” History of European Ideas 35 (4): 475–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmoller, Gustav. 1896. The Mercantile System and Its Historical Significance. New York: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Simonds, Arthur Perrin. 1975. “Mannheim’s Sociology of Knowledge as a Hermeneutic Method.” Cultural Hermeneutics 3: 81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonds, Arthur Perrin. 1978. Karl Mannheim’s Sociology of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam. [1776] 1999. The Wealth of Nations. Volume II, edited by Skinner, Andrew. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Stagl, Justin. 1993. “On the Natural and Cultural Origins of the Social Bond.” In Leonard, Eileen B., Strasser, Herman, and Westhues, Kenneth, eds., In Search of Community. Essays in Memory of Werner Stark, 1910–1985. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 117–136.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1934. “Ursprung und Aufstieg des landwirtschaftlichen Großbetriebs in den böhmischen Ländern” [Origin and development of large-scale agricultural enterprise in Bohemia and Moravia]. Rechts- und Staatswissenchaftliche Abhandlungen der Universität in Prag. Volume 7. Brünn, Prague, Leipzig, and Vienna: Rohrer.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1936. “Wahrungsvertrage” [Currency treaties]. In Festschrift fur Oskar Englander. Brunn, Prague, Leipzig, and Vienna: Rohrer, pp. 263–289.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1937. “Niedergang und Ende des landwirtschaftlichen Grossbetriebs in den böhmischen Ländern” [Decline and end of large-scale agricultural enterprise in Bohemia and Moravia]. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 146: 416–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1941a. “Liberty and Equality, or: Jeremy Bentham as an Economist, I: Bentham’s Doctrine.” Economic Journal 51 (201): 56–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1941b. “A Forerunner of Marxism: Francois-Jean de Chastellux.” Economica, New Series 8 (30): 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1943a. The Ideal Foundations of Economic Thought: Three Essays on the Philosophy of Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1943b. “Review of ‘Two Manuscripts by Charles Davenant, A Reprint of Economic Tracts edited by G. Heberton Evans.’” Economica, New Series 10 (39): 270–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1943c. “Saint-Simon as a Realist.” Journal of Economic History 3 (1): 42–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1944. The History of Economics in Its Relation to Social Development. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1945a. “The Realism of Saint-Simon’s Spiritual Program.” Journal of Economic History 5 (1): 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1945b. “Cardinal Newman: The Social Philosopher.” In Tristram, H., ed., John Henry Newman: Centenary Essays. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne, pp. 155–177.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1946. “Jeremy Bentham as an Economist, II: Bentham’s Influence.” Economic Journal 56 (224): 583–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1947. “Diminishing Utility Reconsidered.” Kyklos I (4): 321–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1948. “Pascal’s Meditations on Society.” The Hibbert Journal: 26–35.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1950a. “Stable Equilibrium Re-examined.” Kyklos V (2/3): 218–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1950b. “Towards a Theory of Social Knowledge.” Review Internationale de Philosophie 4 (13): 287–308.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1950c. “Kierkegaard on Capitalism.” Sociological Review 42 (1): 87–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1951. “Capitalism, Calvinism and the Rise of Modern Science.” Sociological Review 43 (5): 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1952a. “Introduction.” In Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings , Vol. I. London: George Allen and Unwin, pp. 11–78.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1952b. “Introduction.” In Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings , Vol. II. London: George Allen and Unwin, pp. 7–113.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1954a. “Introduction.” In Jeremy Bentham’s Economic Writings , Vol. III. London: George Allen and Unwin, pp. 7–59.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1954b. “Funfzig Jahre britischen Wirtschaftsdenkens” [Fifty years of British economic thought]. Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik 166: 1–19.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1954c. “La interpretacion marxista de la religion y la interpretacion religiosa del marxismo” [The Marxist interpretation of religion or the religious interpretation of Marxism]. Revista Internacional de Sociologia: 33–43.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1955. “Joseph Schumpeter’s Umwertung der Werte; eine kritische Aussenendersetzung mit seiner History of Economic Analysis.” Kyklos VIII (3): 225–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1956. “The Contained Economy: An Interpretation of Medieval Economic Thought.” Aquinas paper no. 26. The Aquinas society of London.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1957. “Der Ackerbau der bohmischen Gutswirtschaften im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert” [Grain production of the Bohemian estates in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries]. Zeitschrift fur Agrargeschichte: 20–41.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1958a. “Die Dogmengeschichte der Volkswirtschaftslehre im Lichte des Pragmatismus” [The history of economic doctrines in the light of pragmatism]. Kyklos XI (3): 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1958b. “La ‘Heteronomia de los Fines’ en el Pensiamento Social y Economico Moderno ” [The ‘heteronomy of purposes’ in modern social and economic thought]. Revista Internacional de Sociologia (Apr–June): 197–222.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. [1958c] 1991. The Sociology of Knowledge: Towards a Deeper Understanding of the History of Ideas. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1959. “The Classical Situation in Political Economy.” Kyklos XII (1): 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1963. “In Search of the True Pareto.” British Journal of Sociology 14 (2): 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1966–1972. The Sociology of Religion: A Study of Christendom. Volumes 1–5. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1967. “Die Sektenethiken und der Geist des Kapitalismus” [Sectarian ethics and the spirit of capitalism]. Revista Internacional de Sociologia 25: 5–15.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1968. “Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte: Parallele oder Kontrast?” [Economic history and social history: Parallelism or contrast?]. Archiv fur Rechts und Sozialphilosophie 54 (4): 485–498.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1976–1987. The Social Bond: An Investigation into the Bases of Law-Abidingness. Volumes 1–6. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Stark, Werner. 1994. History and Historians of Political Economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.Google Scholar
Szmrecsányi, Tamás. 2001. “J. A. Schumpeter, Werner Stark and the Historiography of Economic Thought.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 23 (4): 491–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 1978. Land, Labour and Economic Discourse. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Tribe, Keith. 2015. The Economy of the Word. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigo de Lima, Iara. 2010. Foucault’s Archeology of Political Economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wilson, Charles H. 1969. Economic History and the Historian. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Martin. 1969. “French Views on Wealth and Taxes from the Middle Ages to the Old Regime.” In Coleman, D. C., ed., Revisions in Mercantilism. London: Methuen and Co. Ltd., pp. 190–209. [Originally published in Journal of Economic History 26, 4 (1966).]Google Scholar
John Maynard Keynes Papers, Modern Archives, King’s College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
John Maynard Keynes Papers, Modern Archives, King’s College, Cambridge.Google Scholar