Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:13:49.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

To What Extent Did Mill's Economic Thought Evolve During his Final Decade, and Why?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Jeff Lipkes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In an episode that reflects tellingly on the state of the economics profession in England circa 1870, John Morley presented himself as a candidate for the London University Chair of Political Economy that John Elliot Cairnes was obliged to vacate because of advancing paralysis. Morley, perhaps the most unswervingly loyal disciple of John Stuart Mill and the editor of the Fortnightly Review, was undeterred by the fact that he had published nothing on the subject, apart from an article on Turgot. Nor, in his letter seeking Mill's endorsement, did Morley feel the need to hint at any prospective scholarly contributions to the discipline. He suggested only that he was “a competent person and likely to discharge the duties of the post industriously” (Morley 1872).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Spring 1996 , pp. 115 - 132
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Belcham, J. 1995. Nineteenth-Century Radicalism, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Biagini, Eugenio. 1992. Liberty, Retrenchment and Reform: Popular Liberalism in the Age of Gladstone, 1860–1880, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brennan, H. G. and Waterman, A. M. C., eds. 1995. Economics and Religion: Are They Distinct?, Kluwer, Boston.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1861. Cairnes to Mill, May 14, 1861, 56A, item 2, Mill-Taylor Collection, British Library of Political and Economic Science.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1862. The Slave Power, Harper, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1865. Cairnes to Mill, August 20, 1865, item 30, Mill-Taylor Collection, British Library of Political and Economic Science.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1867a. Cairnes to Leonard Courtney, June 7, 1867, Courtney Collection, British Library of Political and Economic Science.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1867b. Cairnes to Mill, July 26, 1867, MS. HUT 4, Eisenhower Library, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1867c. Cairnes to Mill, August 2, 1867, 56A, item 46, Mill-Taylor Collection, British Library of Political and Economic Science.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1867d. Cairnes to Courtney, August 4, 1867, Courtney Papers, British Library of Political and Economic Science.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1867e. Cairnes to Mill, September 7, 1867, item 48, Mill-Taylor Collection, British Library of Political and Economic Science.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1868. Cairnes to Courtney, March 5, 1868, Courtney Collection, British Library of Political and Economic Science.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1872a. Cairnes to Mill, May 2, 1872, MS HUT 4, Special Collections, Eisenhower Library, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1872b. Cairnes to Croom Robertson, May 7, 1872, Croom Robertson Papers, Special Collections, University College London.Google Scholar
Cairnes, John Elliot. 1874. Some Leading Principles of Political Economy, Newly Expounded, Macmillan, London, 1884.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Janet. 1991. John Stuart Mill and the Writing of Character, University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
Collini, Stephen. 1991. Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain, 1850–1930, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fawcett, Henry. 1872. “The Nationalisation of the Land,” Fortnightly Review, 12, n. s. December, 627–43.Google Scholar
Forget, Evelyn. 1992. “J. S. Mill and the Tory School: The Rhetorical Value of the Recantation,” History of Political Economy, 24, Spring, 31–60.Google Scholar
Hilton, Boyd. 1988. The Age of Atonement: The Influence of Evangelicalism on Social and Economic Thought, 1785–1865, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1978. “The Other John Stuart Mill,” in Victorian Minds, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 113–54.Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. 1974. On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill, ICS Press, San Franciso, 1990.Google Scholar
Hollander, Samuel. 1985. The Economics of John Stuart Mill, 2 vols., Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jevons, William Stanley [anon.]. 1882. “T. E. C. Leslie,” The Economist, February 4, 1882.Google Scholar
Kinzer, Bruce. 1991. “John Stuart Mill and the Experience of Political Engagement,” in Laine, M., ed., A Cultivated Mind: Essays on John Stuart Mill Presented to John M. Robson, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 182–214.Google Scholar
Leslie, T. E. C. n.d.a. Leslie, to Ingram, J. K., January 25, n.d., D 2808/43/19, Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, Belfast.Google Scholar
Leslie, T. E. C. n.d.b. [1871] Leslie to Mill, February 7, n.d., MS. HUT 4, Eisenhower Library, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Leslie, T. E. C. n.d.c. Leslie, to Ingram, , October 19, n.d., D2808/43/32, Public Record Office, Belfast.Google Scholar
Leslie, T. E. C. 1879. Essays in Political and Moral Philosophy, Hodges, Foster and Figgis, Dublin.Google Scholar
Leslie, T. E. C. 1870. Land Systems and Industrial Economy of Ireland, England and Continental Countries; reprint, Augustus M. Kelley, Fairfield, 1968.Google Scholar
Leslie, T. E. C. 1888. Essays in Political Economy, edited by Ingram, J. K. and Bastable, C. F.; reprint, Augustus M. Kelley, Fairfield, 1969.Google Scholar
Lipkes, Jeff. 1995. Politics, Religion, and the Fate of Classical Political Economy: John Stuart Mill and His Followers, 1860–1875, doctoral dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics, 8th ed., Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1963. The Earlier Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1812–1848, edited by Mineka, F., in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 12, 13, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1965. Principles of Political Economy, edited by Robson, J., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 2, 3, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1967. Essays on Economics and Society, edited by Robson, J., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 5, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1969. Essays on Ethics, Religion and Society, edited by Robson, J., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 10, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1972. The Later Letters of John Stuart Mill, 1849–1873, edited by Mineka, F. and Lindley, D., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 14–17, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1981. Autobiography and Literary Essays, edited by Robson, J., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 1, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1982. Essays on England, Ireland, and the Empire, edited by J. Robson, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 6, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1990. Writings on India edited by Robson, J., Moir, M., Moir, Z., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 30, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, John. 1872a. Morley to Mill, April 28, 1872, 350/2/35, Sterling Library, Yale University.Google Scholar
Morley, John. 1872b. Morley to Mill, May 6, 1972, Sterling Library, Yale University, 350/2/35.Google Scholar
Morley, John. 1872c. Morley to Mill, May 14, 1872, Sterling Library, Yale University, 350/2/35.Google Scholar
Morley, John. 1875. “Mr. Mill's Three Essays on Religion,” part 2, Fortnightly Review, 17, n. s., January, 103–31.Google Scholar
Morley, John. 1885. “The Life of George Eliot,” Macmillan's Magazine, 51, February, 241–56.Google Scholar
Morley, John. 1917. Recollections, 2 vols., Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert H. 1991. Reaching for Heaven on Earth: The Theological Meaning of Economics, Littlefield, Adams, Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1973. Politics, Language and Time, Atheneum, New York.Google Scholar
Robson, Ann and John, Robson. 1985. “Private and Public Goals: John Stuart Mill and the London and Westminster” in Wiener, J. ed., Innovators and Preachers: The Role of the Editor in Victorian England, Greenwood Press, Westport, 231–58.Google Scholar
Shadwell, John L. 1877. A System of Political Economy, Trubner, London.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1883. The Principles of Political Economy, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1982. “Mill on Economics and Society,” The Economist as Preacher and Other Essays, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Taussig, F. W. 1900. Wages and Capital, Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
Thornton, William. 1845. Overpopulation and Its Remedy, Longman, Brown, Green, London.Google Scholar
Thornton, William. 1857. Modern Manicheism, Labour's Utopia, and Other Poems, Parker, London.Google Scholar
Thornton, William. 1873. Old Fashioned Ethics and Common-Sense Metaphysics, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Thornton, William. 1848. A Plea for Peasant Proprietors; reprint, Augustus M. Kelley, Fairfield, New Jersey, 1969.Google Scholar
Waterman, A. M. C. 1991. Revolution, Economics and Religion: Christian Political Economy, 1798–1833, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, E. G. and Hafer, R. W. 1978. “J. S. Mill, Unions and the Wages Fund Recantation: A Reinterpretation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 92, November, 603–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, M. Norton and Charles, Smith. 1989. “Work and Waste: Political Economy and Natural Philosophy in Nineteenth Century Britain,” part 2, History of Science, 17, 391–449.Google Scholar