Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:12:36.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ten Major Problems in the Study of the History of Economic Thought*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Donald A. Walker
Donald A. Walker
Affiliation:
Indiana University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I was motivated to consider the topics of this paper by repeatedly encountering the same problems in pondering the history of economic thought, not only in my own work but when retereeing papers and reading the publications of others. The problems that I will consider are important because they involve fundamental issues in the selections and representations we make of the history of economic thought. I do not have solutions for all of the problems, nor do I believe that each of them has a single solution. My objective in this address is not precisely to solve the problems, although I will suggest some ways of dealing with some of them. My purpose rather is to identify the problems in a clear way and to review how they have been treated in order to provide a common basis for further discussion. They can be divided into technical problems and problems of approach.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Fall 1988 , pp. 99 - 115
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, William J. (1984). “The Concept of the ‘Multiplier’ in American Economic Thought in the 1920's,” Storia del Pensiero Economico, n.s., 12, 3–7.Google Scholar
Bousquet, G.H. (1960). Pareto (1848–1923); Le savant et l'homme, Lausanne, Payot.Google Scholar
Breit, William. (1987). “Biography and the Making of Economic Worlds,” Southern Economic Journal, 53, 04, 823–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J.M. (1923). “Overhead Costs in Modern Industry,” Journal of Political Economy, 31, 10, Part III, 606–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert W., Clower (1975). “Reflections on the Keynesian Perplex,” Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 35 07, 1–24; and in Walker 1984.Google Scholar
de Marchi, Neil and John, Lodewijks. (1983). “HOPE and the Journal Literature in the History of Economic Thought.” History of Political Economy, 15, Fall, 321–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. (1978). Ways of Worldmaking, Indianapolis. Hackett Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Mary. (1981). Revolutions and Reconstructions in the Philosophy of Science, Brighton, Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Jaffé, William. (1965). Correspondence of Léon Walras and Related Papers, Amsterdam, North-Holland.Google Scholar
Jaffé, William. (1977). “A Centenarian on a Bicentenarian: Léon Walras's Eléments on Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 10, 05, 300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffé, William. (1980). “Walras's Economics as Others See It.” Journal of Economic Literature, 18, 06, 528–549.Google Scholar
Kantor, J.R. (1945). Psychology and Logic, Bloomington, Indiana, Principia Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. (1936). The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, 7, London and Basingstoke, Macmillan, St. Martin's Press for the Royal Economic Society, 1973.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. (1973). The General Theory and After; Part I Preparation, edited by Moggridge, Donald, Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, 13, London and Basingstoke, Macmillan, St. Martin's Press for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. (1973). The General Theory and After; Part II Defence and Development, edited by Moggridge, Donald, Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, 14, London and Basingstoke, Macmillan, St. Martin's Press for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. (1987). “The Advent of Modernism,” 05, mimeographed, pp. 52.Google Scholar
Medawar, P. (1968). “‘Lucky Jim’: Review of J.D. Watson, The Double Helix,” New York Review of Books, 03 28.Google Scholar
Rashid, Salim. (1987). “Economics and the Study of Its Past,” World Development, forthcoming, mimeographed, pp. 34.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A. (1987a). “How Economics Has Changed.” The Journal of Economic Education, 18, Fall, 107–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A.. (1987b). “Out of the Closet: A Program for the Whig History of Economic Science.” History of Economics Society Bulletin, 9, Spring. 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1970). “The Evolution of Modern Economic Theory, by Lord Robbins.” Economica, n.s., 37, 11, 425–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J.. (1976). “The Scientific Uses of Scientific Biography, with Special Reference to J.S. Mill.” in James and John Stuart Mill; Papers of the Centenary Conference, edited by Robson, John M. and Laine, Melrose, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Donald A. (1978). “Clarence Ayres's Policy Proposals.” Southern Economic Journal, 44, 01, 696–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, Donald A.. (1983a). “William Jaffé, Officier de liaison intellectuel,” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, edited by Samuels, Warren J., Greenwich, CT. JAI Press, 1, 19–39.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A.. (1983b). “Biography and the Study of Economic Thought,” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology; The Craft of the Historian of Economic Thought, edited by Samuels, Warren J., 1, Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, 41–59.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A.. ed. (1984). Money and Markets; Essays by Robert W. Clower, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Donald A.. ed. (1987). “What Aspects of Keynes's Economic Theories Merit Continued or Renewed Interest?” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology, 5, Greenwich, CT, JAI Press, 151–193.Google Scholar
Ward, Benjamin. (1979). The Ideal Worlds of Economics, Liberal, Radical and Conservative World Views, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar