Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:41:31.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schumpeter on Entrepreneurs and Innovation: A Reappraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Mark W. Frank
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Over the past two decades, technology and innovation have become common themes within the economic growth and economic development literatures. This renewed emphasis is highlighted by the developments in endogenous growth theory (Romer, 1986, 1990; Barro and Sala-I-Martin, 1995), but many have noted that its roots can, in part, be traced to the works of Joseph A. Schumpeter (Nelson and Winter, 1982; Blaug, 1986; Rostow, 1990; Cheng and Dinopoulos, 1992; Freeman 1994; Thanawala, 1994). Schumpeter's principal contributions include his theory that the creative response of entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial innovation are the primary determinants of economic change. However, most argue that his vision of entrepreneurs is dichotomous, with one part corresponding to his European period, and the other to his American period (see, for example, Phillips, 1971; Klein, 1977; Nelson, 1977; Freeman, 1982, 1994; Swedberg, 1991; Scherer, 1992; Thanawala, 1994; Malerbaand Orsenigo, 1995). The initial part of his work, it is argued, focuses not on large firms and market structures, but on small firms and individual entrepreneurs. Here Schumpeter presents entrepreneurs as isolated, romanticized individuals who challenge the social system and indirectly propel society to greater economic heights. This period, it is argued, reflects the European half of his life. Schumpeter's American period begins with his stays at Harvard for the academic year of 1927-28, and for a greater part of the year 1930. It is generally argued that in this American period, Schumpeter altered his vision of economic development to accentuate the advantages of monopolistic competition, and to include large established corporations and government agencies as agglomerations capable of fulfilling the entrepreneurial function.

Type
Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 1998 , pp. 505 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barro, Robert J. and Xavier, Sala-i-Martin. 1995. Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Blaug, Mark. 1986. Economic History and the History of Economics, New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Cheng, Leonard K. and Elias, Dinopoulos. 1992. “Schumpeterian Growth and International Business Cycles,” American Economic Review, 82, no. 2, May, 409–41.Google Scholar
Freeman, Christopher. 1982. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Freeman, Christopher. 1994. “The Economics of Technical Change,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18, no. 5, October, 463–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, Petur O. 1994. “Social Influence and Individual Preferences: On Schumpeter's Theory of Consumer Choice,” Review of Social Economy, 52, no. 4, Winter, 301–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Burton H. 1977. Dynamic Economics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinknecht, Alfred. 1990. “Are there Schumpeterian Waves of Innovations?,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14, no. 1, March, 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, Simon. 1940. “Schumpeter's Business Cycles,” American Economic Review, 30, no. 3, June, 257–71.Google Scholar
Langlois, Richard N. 1991. “Schumpeter and the Obsolescence of the Entrepreneur,” University of Connecticut, November, Working Paper 91–1503.Google Scholar
Malerba, Franco and Luigi, Orsenigo. 1995. “Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, no. 1, February, 47–65.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. 1977. The Moon and the Ghetto, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard R. and Winter, Sidney G.. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Phillips, Almarin. 1971. Technology and Market Structure: A Study of the Aircraft Industry, Lexington Books, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Romer, Paul M. 1986. “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, 94, no. 5, October, 1002–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Paul M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, 98, no. 5, part 2, October, S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostow, W. W. 1990. Theorists of Economic Growth From David Hume to the Present, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V. W. 1959. “Usher and Schumpeter on Invention, Innovation, and Technological Change,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 73, no. 4, November, 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santarelli, Enrico and Enzo, Pesciarelli. 1990. “The Emergence of a Vision: The Development of Schumpeter's Theory of Entrepreneurship, “History of Political Economy, 22, no. 4, 677–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, F. M. 1992. “Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism,” Journal of Economic Literature, 30, no. 3, September, 1416–33.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1928. “The Instability of Capitalism,” in Clemence, Richard V., ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1991, 47–72.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1996.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1935. “The Analysis of Economic Change,” in Clemence, Richard V., ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1991, 134–49.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalism Process, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1943. “Capitalism in the Postwar World,” in Clemence, Richard V., ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1991, 175–88.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1946. “Capitalism,” in Clemence, Richard V., ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1991, 189–210.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1947a. “The Creative Response in Economic History,” in Clemence, Richard V., ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1991, 221–31.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1947b. “Theoretical Problems of Economic Growth,” in Clemence, Richard V., ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1991, 232–40.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1949a. “Economic Theory and Entrepreneurial History,” in Clemence, Richard V., ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1991, 253–71.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1949b. “Science and Ideology,” in Clemence, Richard V., ed., Essays on Entrepreneurs, Innovations, Business Cycles, and the Evolution of Capitalism, Transaction Publishers, New Jersey, 1991, 272–86.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1950. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1976.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1991. The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism, edited by Swedberg, Richard, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
Shionoya, Yuichi. 1990. “Instrumentalism in Schumpeter's Economic Methodology,” History of Political Economy, 22, no. 2, 187–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shionoya, Yuichi. 1991. “Schumpeter on Schmoller and Weber: A Methodology of Economic Sociology,” History of Political Economy, 23, no. 2, 193–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedberg, Richard. 1991. Schumpeter: A Biography, Princeton, New Jersey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thanawala, Kishor. 1994. “Schumpeter's Theory of Economic Development and Development Economics,” Review of Social Economy, 52, no. 4, Winter, 353–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfson, R. J. 1958. “The Economic Dynamics of Joseph Schumpeter,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 7, no. 1, October, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar