Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:06:29.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roundtable on Jan Golinski's Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science Comments on Jan Golinski's Making Natural Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Jeff Biddle
Jeff Biddle
Affiliation:
Michigan State University, Department of Economics, 101 Marshall Hall, East Lansing, MI 48824.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

About three lines into his book Making Natural Knowledge, Jan Golinski defines the “constructivist” view of science as “that which regards scientific knowledge primarily as a human product, made with locally situated cultural and material resources, rather than as simply the revelation of a pre-given order of nature” (Golinski 1998, p. ix). Having a pretty good idea of what Professor Golinski's book was going to be about, this stopped me for a moment. Is that all there is to it? Is that what the work of the Strong Programme, Latour, Pickering, Knorr-Cetina; the talk of mangle, black boxes and resistances, is all about? Described this way, it seems quite reasonable; a way of thinking about scientific activity that should at least be given a hearing. Admittedly, I have seen other, usually more prolix, ways of characterizing what Golinski has called the constructivist view of science. But I like this one. It sends what I believe to be the correct message that this “constructivism” is, at its heart, better characterized as plausible and intriguing than outrageous, and that it is not necessarily threatening to any core values held by historians.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 253 - 259
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Golinski, Jan. 1998. Making Natural Knowledge: Constructivism and the History of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Judy. 1997. Statistical Visions In Time: A History of Time Series Analysis, 1662–1938. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 1989. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Star, Susan Leigh. 1983. “Simplification in Scientific Work—An Example from Neuroscience Research.” Social Studies of Science 13: 205–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar