Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:41:32.012Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RICARDO: ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND SOCIAL ORDER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bagehot, W. 1888. Economic Studies, edited by Holt Hutton, Richard. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Barber, W. 1967. A History of Economic Thought. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Blaug, M. 1992. Economic Theory in Retrospect, fifth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coats, A.W. 1971. The Classical Economists and Economic Policy. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Depoortèe, C. 2005. On an Overlooked Scottish Contribution to the Method of Political Economy, paper presented to the ESHET conference, Stirling, Scotland.Google Scholar
Davis, T. 2002. “David Ricardo, Financier and Empirical Economist.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 9 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, W. 2005. “From Ricardo to Marshall to Keynes.” EAEPE conference, Bremen, November, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R.B. and Hébert, R.F. 1997. A History of Economic Theory and Method. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fetter, F.W. 1965. “Economic Controversy in the British Reviews, 1802–1850.” Economica XXXII (N.S.) No. 128.Google Scholar
Fetter, F.W. 1980. The Economist in Parliament: 1780-1868. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Gonner, E.C.K. 1890. “Ricardo and His Critics.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 4 (April): 276-90. In Cunningham Wood, J., ed., David Ricardo: Critical Assessments. London: Croom Helm, 1985, pp. 10–18.Google Scholar
Grampp, W. 1965. Economic Liberalism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Grampp, W. 1981. “Ricardo and Malthus.” Journal of Economic History 41 (June): 421–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harling, P. 1996. The Waning of “Old Corruption”: The Politics of Economical Reform in Britain, 1779-1846. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Harling, P and Mandler, P.. 1993. “From ‘Fiscal-Military’ State to Laissez-faire State, 1760-1850.” Journal of British Studies 32 (January): 44–70.Google Scholar
Halévy, E. 1928. The Growth of Philosophic Radicalism. London: Faber & Gwyer.Google Scholar
Heilbroner, R.L. 1980. The Worldly Philosophers, fifth edition. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1979. The Economics of David Ricardo. London: Heineman.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1990. “Ricardian Growth Theory: A Resolution of Some Problems in Interpretation. Oxford Economic Papers 42 (2): 730–50.Google Scholar
Hollander, S. 1994. “On the Textual Interpretation of Ricardian Growth Theory: The ‘New View’ Confirmed (again).” History of Political Economy 26 (3): 487–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, T.W. 1953. “James Mill and the Political Education of Ricardo.”Cambridge Journal VII (November): 81–100.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T.W. 1964. “Positive” Economics and Policy Objectives. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T.W. 1994. The Uses and Abuses of Economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jevons, W.S. 1970. Theory of Political Economy. London: Penguin, 1871.Google Scholar
Levy, D.M. 2002. How the Dismal Science Got Its Name. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. 1933. Essays in Biography. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.M. 1973-79. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, edited by Moggridge, D.E.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Malthus, T.R. 1989. Principles of Political Economy, edited by Pullen, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malthus, T.R. 1986. The Works of Thomas Robert Malthus, edited by Wrigley, E.A. and Souden, David. London: Pickering.Google Scholar
Milgate, M. and Stimson, S. 1991. Ricardo's Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Paine, Thomas. 1791. The Rights of Man. London: Penguin, 1984.Google Scholar
Peach, Terry. 1997. “The Age of the Universal Consumer: A Reconsideration of Ricardo's Politics.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 4 (2): 217–36.Google Scholar
Price, R. 1772. An Appeal to the Public on the Subject of the National Debt, second edition. London: T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Price, R. 1775. Observations on the Nature of Civil Liberty, the Principles of Government and the Justice and Policy of the War with America, sixth edition. London: T. Cadell.Google Scholar
Price, R. 1789. A Sermon on the Love of Our Country. London: T. Cadell.Google Scholar
O'Brien, D.P. 1975. The Classical Economists. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, D. 1951-73. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo, edited by Sraffa, Piero. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roll, E. 1983. A History of Economic Thought, fourth edition. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, W.D. 1983. “The End of “Old Corruption” in Britain 1780-1860.” Past & Present 101 (November): 55–86.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. 1877. Lectures on Political Economy, 1809-10. Collected Works of Dugald Stewart, Vol. III, edited by William Hamilton, Sir. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. 1792. Elements of the Philosophy of the Human Mind. Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1814.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.P. 1965. “The Peculiarities of the English.” The Socialist Register, pp. 311–62.Google Scholar
Thompson, E.P. 1980. The Making of the English Working Classes. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Toynbee, A. 1884. Lectures on the Industrial Revolution of the 18th Century in England. London: Longmans & Green Co., 1927.Google Scholar
Whatmore, R. 2000. “A Gigantic Manliness: Paine's Republicanism in the 1790s.” In Stefan, Collini, Richard, Whatmore, and Brian, Young, Economy, Polity and Society: British Intellectual History and History, 1750-1950. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winch, D. 1978. Adam Smith's Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar