Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T08:13:42.635Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVIEW ESSAY: MARSHALL REVIVED

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

DONALD WINCH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Essay
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 127 - 134
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aspromourgos, Tony. 1986. “On the Origin of the Term ‘Neoclassical’.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 10 (3): 265–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1984. “Alfred Marshall's Mother and Father.” History of Political Economy 16 (4): 519–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colander, David. 2000. “The Death of Neoclassical Economics.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 22 (2): 127–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1924/1933. “Alfred Marshall.” In Essays in Biography, The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. X. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Royal Economic Society, 1972.Google Scholar
Loasby, Brian. 1978. “What Happened to Marshall's Theory of Value?” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 25 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loasby, Brian. 1986. “Marshall's Economics of Progress.” Journal of Economic Studies 13 (5): 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loasby, Brian. 1990. “Firms, Markets, and the Principle of Continuity.” In Whitaker, J. K., ed., Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.108–26.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics, 8th edition. London: Macmillan and Co. for the Royal Economic Society, 1960.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. 1919. Industry and Trade; A Study of Industrial Technique and Business Organisation; and of their Influences on the Conditions of Various Classes and Nations. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Myint, Hla. 1948. Theories of Welfare Economics. London: London School of Economics. Reprinted New York:Kelly, Augustus M., 1965.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action; A Study in Social Theory with Special Reference to a Group of Recent European Writers. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Pigou, Arthur Cecil, ed. 1925. Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, Tiziano. 2003. Marshall's Evolutionary Economics. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Joan. 1933. Economics of Imperfect Competition. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
Schultz, Bart. 2004. Henry Sidgwick: Eye of the Universe: An Intellectual Biography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1951. Ten Great Economists; From Marx to Keynes. New York: Oxford University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1941. Production and Distribution Theories: The Formative Period. New York: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Veblen, Thorstein. 1900. “The Preconceptions of Economic Science.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 14 (2): 240–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitaker, John K., ed. 1990. Centenary Essays on Alfred Marshall. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitaker, John K., ed. 1996. The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press for the Royal Economic Society.Google Scholar
Young, Allyn. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal 38 (152): 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar