Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:30:08.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceptions of our Discipline: Three Magisterial Treatments of the Evolution of Economic Thought

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Mark Perlman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , Winter 1986 , pp. 9 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cossa, Luigi (1893), An Introduction to the Study of Political Economy. (Revised from his original [1876] and revised versions of Guido allo studio dell'economia politica by the author and translated from the Italian by Louis, Dyer. London and New York, Macmillan, 1893.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon (1979). Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Terence W. (1977). Knowledge and Ignorance in Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Hutchison, Terence W. (1978). On Revolutions and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Koopmans, Tjalling Charles (1947). “Measurement without Theory,” Rev. Econ. Stat., 29 (1947), 161–72.Google Scholar
Machlup, Fritz (1982). Knowledge: Its Creation, Distribution, and Economic Significance, Volume II, “The Branches of Learning.” Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. (1983). “The Rhetoric of Economics,” Jour. Econ. Lit., 21 (1983). 481–517.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley Clair (1896). “The Quantity Theory of the Value of Money,” Jour. Pol. Econ., vol. 4, 139–65.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley Clair. (1903) A History of the Greenbacks, with Special Reference to the Economic Consequences of Their Issue: 1862–65. (The Decennial Publications of the University of Chicago, 2d. Series, vol. 9) University of Chicago Press, 1903.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley Clair. (1904). “The Real Issues in the Quantity Theory of Money Controversy,” Jour. Pol. Econ. vol. 5 (1904), .Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley Clair. (1908). Gold, Prices, and Wages under the Greenback Standard. (University of California Publications in Economics, vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1908.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley Clair. (1913). Business Cycle. (Memoirs of the University of California, vol. 3). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1913. [New edition of Part III published with title Business Cycles and Their Causes. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1941].Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley Clair. (1917). “Wieser's Theory of Social Economics,” Pol. Sci. Quart., vol. 32, pp. 95–118.Google Scholar
[Reprinted in The Backward Art of Spending Money, 1937, pp. 225–57].Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley Clair. (1927). Foreward to Friedrich von Wieser's Social Economics (translated by Hinrichs, A. Ford). New York: Adelphi, 1927.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Wesley Clair. (1937). The Backward Art of Spending Money and Other Essays. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1937.Google Scholar
[Mitchell, Wesley Clair] (1952). Wesley Clair Mitchell: ‘The Economic Scientist’. Edited by Arthur F., Burns. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1952.Google Scholar
[Mitchell, Wesley Clair]. (1967 and 1969). Types of Economic Theory: From Mercantilism to Institutionalism. Edited with an Introduction by Joseph, Dorfman. New York: Kelley, vol. 1, 1967; vol. 2, 1969.Google Scholar
Perlman, Mark (1978). “Reflections on Methodology and Persuasion,” in [Machlup, Fritz]. Breadth and Depth in Economics. Edited by Dreyer, Jacob S.. Lexington, Mass. and Toronto: Health-Lexington, 1978, pp. 37–45.Google Scholar
Perlman, Mark. (1986). “Subjectivism and American Institutionalism,” in a forthcoming bu as yet unannounced Festschrift edited by Kirzner, Israel.Google Scholar
Pribram, Karl (1983). A History of Economic Reasoning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
SchumpeterJoseph, A. Joseph, A. (1912). Epochen der Dogmen-und der Methodengeschichte. Mohr, J.C.B., (Paul Siebeck) verlag, 1912Google Scholar
(English edition entitled Economic Doctrine and Method: And Historical Sketch. Translated by Aris, R.. London: Allen & Unwin, 1954).Google Scholar
SchumpeterJoseph, A. Joseph, A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1954.Google Scholar