Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:27:36.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Paradoxical Fate of the Representative Firm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Frank Schohl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

More than 100 years have passed since Alfred Marshall introduced the representative firm to economic theory in 1891. During this long period of time, many arguments have been raised giving either support or opposition to the concept. In recent years, macroeconomists have taken an increasing interest in the representative firm. Since the beginning of the modern microfoundations literature in the early 1970s, the representative firm and its big brother, the representative agent, have been made essential analytical tools for linking macroeconomics and microeconomics. Within this debate, the microfoundation of business cycle theory has played a prominent role.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 1999 , pp. 65 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bain, J. S. 1956. Barriers to New Competition: Their Character and Consequences in Manufacturing Industries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, J. H. 1922a. “Of Empty Economic Boxes.” Economic Journal 32: 305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clapham, J. H. 1922b. “The Economic Boxes: A Rejoinder.” Economic Journal 32: 560–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. 1955. “The Industry and the Representative Firm.” Economic Journal 65: 710–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wolff, P. 1941. “Income Elasticity of Demand: a Micro-economic and a Macro-economic Interpretation.” Economic Journal 51: 140–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F. Y. 1891. “Review of the 2nd Edition of Marshall's Principles of Economics.” Economic Journal 1: 611–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ees, H. van and Garretsen, H.. 1990. “The Right Answers to the Wrong Question? An Assessment of the Microfoundations Debate.” De Economist 138: 123–45.Google Scholar
Grunfeld, Y. and Griliches, Z.. 1960. “Is Aggregation Necessarily Bad?” Review of Economics and Statistics 42: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hague, D. C. 1958. “Alfred Marshall and the Competitive Firm.” Economic Journal 68: 673–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, J. E. 1996. “The Origins of the Representative Agent.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 169–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, J. E. 1997. The Representative Agent in Macroeconomics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, M. C. W. 1991a. “The Alleged Necessity of Microfoundations.” Journal of Macroeconomics 13: 619–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, M. C. W. 1991b. “What is this Thing Called Microfoundations?” History of Political Economy 23: 687–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssen, M. C. W. 1993. Micro-foundations: A Critical Inquiry. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1930. “Increasing Returns and the Representative Firm: A Symposium: Note by the Editor.” Economic Journal 40: 79.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1936 The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kirman, A. P. 1992. “Whom or What Does the Representative Individual Represent?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6: 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, L. R. 1946. “Macroeconomics and the Theory of Rational Behaviour.” Econometrica 14: 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kydland, F. E. and Prescott, E. C.. 1982. “Time to build and aggregate fluctuations.” Econometrica 50: 1345–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. B. and Plosser, C. I.. 1983. “Real Business Cycles.” Journal of Political Economy 91: 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, A. 1895. Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1925. “Letter to Prof. A. W. Flux.” In Pigou, A.C., ed., Memorials of Alfred Marshall. London: Macmillan, 406–7.Google Scholar
Mason, E. S. 1939. “Price and Production Policies of Larger-scale Enterprise.” American Economic Review 29: 61–74.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. A. 1958. “Some Marshallian Concepts, Especially the Representative Firm.” Economic Journal 68: 691–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, K. 1947. “Technological Change and Aggregation.” Econometrica 15: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1922. “Empty Economic Boxes: A Reply.” Economic Journal 32: 458–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1927. “The Laws of Diminishing and Increasing Cost.” Economic Journal 37: 188–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigou, A. C. 1928. “An Analysis of Supply.” Economic Journal 38: 238–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pu, Shou S. 1946. “A Note on Macroeconomics.” Econometrica 14: 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, L. 1928. “The Representative Firm.” Economic Journal 38: 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, D. H. 1924. “Those Empty Boxes.” Economic Journal 34: 16–31.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. H. 1930. “The Trees of the Forest.” Economic Journal 40: 80–89.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. H., Sraffa, P., and Shove, G. F.. 1930. “Increasing Returns and the Representative Firm: A Symposium.” Economic Journal 40: 79–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1928. “The Instability of Capitalism.” Economic Journal 38: 361–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1939. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1941. “Alfred Marshall's Principles: A Semi-Centennial Appraisal.” American Economic Review 31: 236–48.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shove, G. F. 1928. “Varying Costs and Marginal Net Products.” Economic Journal 38: 258–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shove, G. F. 1930. The Representative Firm and Increasing Returns. Economic Journal 40: 94–116.Google Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1926. “The Laws of Return under Competitive Conditions.” Economic Journal 36: 535–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sraffa, P. 1930. “A Criticism.” Economic Journal 40: 89–93.Google Scholar
Theil, H. 1954. Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, J. 1939. Statistical Testing of Business Cycle Theories. Vol. I: A Method and its Application to Investment Activity. Vol. II: Business Cycles in the United States of America, 1919–1932. Geneva: League of Nation, Economic Intelligence Service.Google Scholar
Williamson, S. D. 1996. “Real Business Cycle Research Comes of Age: A Review Essay of Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, edited by Thomas F. Cooley.” Journal of Monetary Economics 38: 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J. N. 1954. “The Representative Firm.” Economic Journal 64: 337–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. A. 1928. “Increasing Returns and Economic Progress.” Economic Journal 38: 527–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar