Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:22:49.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ON THE NOTION OF PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY CAUSES: THE LEGACY OF RICARDO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2014

Maria Cristina Marcuzzo
Maria Cristina Marcuzzo*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche, Sapienza, Università di Roma.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper considers the distinction made by David Ricardo between “permanent” and “temporary” causes, which he sometimes refers to also as “stable” and “accidental” causes (see The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo [hereinafter Works] I: 86, 88, 92; VI: 154), to derive implications useful to distinguish his approach from subsequent developments of the notions of short-period and long-period equilibrium. In particular, I trace the change of focus in the concept of “permanent” forces brought about by Alfred Marshall—from whose insights Alfred Kahn and John Maynard Keynes drew inspiration for their short-period analysis—which paved the way to fundamental changes in the method and theory.

It is argued that Ricardo’s distinction maintains an heuristic value, in particular vis-à-vis the distinction between short and long period, which is part of the common language in standard economics.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 421 - 434
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bharadwaj, Krishna. 1986. Classical Political Economy and the Rise to Dominance of Supply and Demand Theories. Calcutta: University Press India.Google Scholar
Dardi, Marco. 1994. “Kahn's Theory of Liquidity Preference and Monetary Policy. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18: 91–106.Google Scholar
Dardi, Marco. 1996. “Imperfect Competition and Short-Period Economics.” In Marcuzzo, M. C., Pasinetti, L. L., and Roncaglia, A., eds., The Economics of Joan Robinson. London: Routledge, pp. 29–35.Google Scholar
De Vroey, Michel. 2000. “Marshall on Equilibrium and Time: A Reconstruction.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 7: 245–269.Google Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1983. “The Classical Theory of Wages and the Role of Demand Schedules in the Determination of Relative Prices.” American Economic Review 73: 309–313.Google Scholar
Garegnani, Pierangelo. 1989. “Some Notes on Capital, Expectations and the Analysis of Changes.” In Feiwel, G. R., ed., Joan Robinson and Modern Economic Theory. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 344–367.Google Scholar
Hamouda, Omar. 1984. “On the Notion of Short-Run and Long-Run: Marshall, Ricardo and Equilibrium Theories.” British Review of Economic Issues 6: 55–82.Google Scholar
Humphrey, Thomas M. 1990. “Ricardo Versus Thornton on the Appropriate Monetary Response to Supply Shocks.” Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond 76: 18–24.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Terence W. 1978. On Revolution and Progress in Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, Richard F. 1932. “The Economics of the Short Period.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kahn, Richard F. 1989. The Economics of the Short Period. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1973a. The General Theory of Employment. Interest and Money. Vol. VII of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Edited by Moggridge., D.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1973b. The General Theory and After: Defence and Development. Vol. XIV of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Edited by Moggridge., D.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard. 1979. The General Theory and After: A Supplement. Vol. XXIX of The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes. Edited by Moggridge., D.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kregel, Jan A. 1983. “Conceptions of Equilibrium, Conceptions of Time and Conceptions of Economic Interaction.” In Caravale, G., ed., La crisi delle teorie economiche. Milano: Franco Angeli, pp. 55–101.Google Scholar
Kyer, Ben L., and Maggs, Gary E.. 2006. “A Note on Time Periods in Macroeconomics.” Atlantic Economic Journal 34: 235–236.Google Scholar
Laidler, David. 1987. “Bullion Controversy.” In Eatwell, J., Milgate, M., and Newnam, P., eds., The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics. Vol. 1. London: Macmillan, pp. 289–294.Google Scholar
Marcuzzo, Maria Cristina. 1996. “Short Period Economics in Retrospect.” In Arestis, P., Palma, G., and Sawyer, M., eds., Capital Controversy, Post Keynesian Economics and the History of Economic Theory: Essays in Honour of Geoff Harcourt. Vol. I. London: Routledge, pp. 398–409.Google Scholar
Marcuzzo, Maria. Cristina. 2002. “David Ricardo and the ‘Natural’ Level of the Quantity of Money.” In Schefold, B., ed., Exogenität und Endogenität. Die Geldmenge in der Geschichte des ökonomischen Denkens und in der modernen Politik. Marburg: Metropolis, pp. 171–185.Google Scholar
Marcuzzo, Maria Cristina, and Rosselli, Annalisa. 1994. “Ricardo's Theory of Money Matters.” Revue Economique 45: 1251–1267.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. [1920] 1964. Principles of Economics. 8th ed.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Denis P. 1975. The Classical Economists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricardo, David. 1951–73. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Edited by P. Sraffa, with the collaboration of M. H. Dobb. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan V. 1980a. “Debate: 1970s.” In Further Contributions to Modern Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 123–130.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan V. 1980b. “Retrospect 1980.” In Further Contributions to Modern Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 130–134.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan V. 1980c. “Time in Economic Theory.” In Further Contributions to Modern Economics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 86–95.Google Scholar
Rosselli, Annalisa. 1985. “The Theory of Natural Wage.” In Caravale, G., ed., The Legacy of Ricardo. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 239–254.Google Scholar
Sanfilippo, Eleonora. 2011. “The Short Period and the Long Period in Macroeconomics: An Awkward Distinction.” Review of Political Economy 23: 371–388.Google Scholar
Whitaker, John K. 1975. The Early Economic Writings of Alfred Marshall 1869–1890. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar