Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:02:13.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Of Pangloss, Pigouvians and Pragmatism: Ronald Coase and Social Cost Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Steven G. Medema
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The laissez-faire welfare theory of classical economics was very much concerned with demonstrating the optimality of the competitive market system, or, more generally, the harmony between individual and social interests. Under the influence of J. S. Mill and Henry Sidgwick, however, this view gradually began to erode. Sidgwick (1901), for example, pointed to a number of factors, including what we now call externalities, that can cause individually-optimal behavior to diverge from the social optimum, and suggested that these potentially call for governmental corrective measures. Alfred Marshall carried this discussion a bit further, but it was through A. C. Pigou's analysis—particularly in The Economics of Welfare (1932)—that the theory of market failure, and the need for government correction of these failures, reached full flower. His work formed the foundation for “modern” welfare economics. The contrast between the “old” and the “modern” welfare economics was pointed out by James Buchanan:

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , Spring 1996 , pp. 96 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aslanbeigui, Nahid and Medema, Steven G.. 1995. “Beyond the Dark Clouds: Coase and Pigou on Social Cost,” mimeo.Google Scholar
Buchanan, James M. and William Craig, Stubblebine. 1962. “Externality,” Economica, 29, November, 371–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canterbery, E. Ray and Marvasti, A.. 1992. “The Coase Theorem as a Negative Externality,” Journal of Economic Issues, 26, December, 1179–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, n.s., 4, November, 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1946. “The Marginal Cost Controversy,” Economica, n.s., 13, August, 169–82.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission,” Journal of Law and Economics, 2, October, 1–40.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1960. “The Problem of Social Cost,” Journal of Law and Economics, 3, October, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1964. “Discussion,” American Economic Review, 54, May, 194–97.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1970a. “Discussion,” in Scott, A. D., ed., Economics of Fisheries Management: A Symposium, 60–61, Institute of Animal Resource Ecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1970b. “Discussion,” in Legal and Economic Aspects of Pollution, University of Chicago Center for Policy Study, Chicago.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1970c. “Social Cost and Public Policy,” in Edwards, George A., ed., Exploring the Frontiers of Administration: Six Essays for Managers, York University Faculty of Administration Studies, Bureau of Research, Toronto, 33–44.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1972. “Industrial Organization: A Proposal for Research,” in Fuchs, Victor R., ed., Policy Issues and Research Opportunities in Industrial Organization, 59–73, National Bureau of Economic Research and Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1974. “The Lighthouse in Economics,” Journal of Law and Economics, 17, October, 357–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1981. “The Coase Theorem and the Empty Core: A Comment,” Journal of Law and Economics, 24, April, 183–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1988a. “Blackmail,” Virginia Law Review, 74, May, 655–76.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1988b. The Firm, the Market, and the Law, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1992. “The Institutional Structure of Production,” American Economic Review, 82, September, 713–19.Google Scholar
Coase, Ronald H. 1993. “Law and Economics at Chicago,” Journal of Law and Economics, 36, April, Part 2, 239–54.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1988. Economics and Institutions, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazonick, William. 1991. Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1994a. “The Myth of Two Coases: What Coase Is Really Saying,” Journal of Economic Issues, 28, March, 208–17.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1994b. Ronald H. Coase, Macmillan, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medema, Steven G. 1995. “The Coase Theorem,” mimeo.Google Scholar
Medema, Steven G. and Samuels, Warren J.. 1995. “Ronald Coase and Coasean Economics: Some Questions, Conjectures, and Implications,” Samuels, Warren J., ed., The Economy as a Valuation Process, Edward Elgar Publishing, Aldershot, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Pigou, Arthur C. 1932. The Economics of Welfare, 4th ed., Macmillan, London, 1962.Google Scholar
Robbins, Lionel. 1976. Political Economy Past and Present: A Review of Leading Theories of Economic Policy, Columbia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1901. The Principles of Political Economy, 3d ed., Kraus Reprint Co., New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1966. The Theory of Price, 3d ed., Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. 1989. “Two Notes on the Coase Theorem,” Yale Law Journal, 99, December, 631–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turvey, Ralph. 1963. “On Divergences Between Social Cost and Private Cost,” Economica, n.s., 30, August, 309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZerbeRichard O., Jr. Richard O., Jr. 1980. “The Problem of Social Cost in Retrospect,” Research in Law and Economics, 2, 83–102.Google Scholar
ZerbeRichard O., Jr. Richard O., Jr. and Medema, Steven G.. 1995. “Ronald Coase, the British Tradition, and the Future of Economic Method,” University of Washington Graduate School of Public Affairs Working Paper in Public Policy Analysis and Management #95–3; in Medema, Steven G., ed., Coasean Economics, Kluwer Academic Publishing, Boston, forthcoming.Google Scholar