Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T09:21:51.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nicholson Versus Ingram on the History of Political Economy and a Charge of Plagiarism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Gregory Moore
Gregory Moore
Affiliation:
School of Business, Australian Catholic University, Christ Campus, Victoria, Australia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1885 John Kells Ingram published a lengthy article on the history of political economy in the Encyclopaedia Britannica, and in 1888 he republished this same article, with only minor changes, as a book entitled The History of Political Economy. Ingram unashamedly interpreted the historical development of political economy from a Comtean variant of the historicist perspective, and, for this reason, these publications became extremely important for the methodological debate, known as the English Methodenstreit, then raging between the orthodox and historical economists. Although the historicist message dovetailed into Ingram's historical narrative was clearly contentious and polemical, the reviews of both versions of this history from either side of the conceptual divide were overwhelmingly positive. Two exceptions were damning anonymous newspaper reviews in The Scotsman: one in 1885 in response to the Encyclopaedia Britannica article, and another in 1888 in response to the book. It is apparent from an entry made in the diary of John Neville Keynes that the first of these reviews was written by Joseph Shield Nicholson (JNK, July 28, 1885, Add 7834), and since the articles are strikingly similar in tone, substance, and style, and since Nicholson wrote other reviews for The Scotsman, it is safe to assume that the second article was also written by Nicholson. The substance of Nicholson's critique can be reduced to two main accusations: first, that Ingram was neither qualified to write a history of political economy nor competent to comment on the methodological issues then under scrutiny, and second, that Ingram had brazenly plagiarized passages drawn from various German histories of political economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 433 - 460
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anonymous. 1910–1911a. “Prefatory Note.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th ed, vol. 1, pp. vii–x.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1910–1911b. “Encyclopaedia.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th ed., vol. 9, pp. 369–82.Google Scholar
Bagehot, W. 1876. “Adam Smith as Person.” In John-Stevas, N.A.F.St., ed., The Collected Works of Walter Bagehot, vol 3. London: The Economist, 1968, pp. 113–19.Google Scholar
Bastable, C.F. 1878. “Money.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 16, pp. 720–38.Google Scholar
Baynes, T.S. 1875. “Prefatory Notice.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 1, pp. v–viii.Google Scholar
Black, J.S. 1921–1922. “Smith, William Robertson.” Dictionary of National Biography. London: Oxford University Press, pp. 568–70.Google Scholar
Black, R.D.C., ed. 1970–1981. Papers and Correspondence of William Stanley Jevons, 7 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Blanqui, J.A. 1880. History of Political Economy in Europe, 4th edition, trans. Leonard, E. J.. New York: A. M. Kelly, 1968.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J.E. 1870. “M. Comte and Political Economy.” In Essays in Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelly, 1968, pp. 187–230.Google Scholar
Cairnes, J.E. 1875. Some Leading Principles of Political Economy, 2nd ed., London: Cass, 1965Google Scholar
Chisolm, H. 1910–1911. “Editorial Introduction.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th ed., vol. 1, pp. xi–xxiv.Google Scholar
Cossa, L. 1880. Guide to the Study of Political Economy, with a preface by W.S. Jevons. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Courtney, L.H. 1875. “Banking.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 3, pp. 315–41.Google Scholar
Ekelund, R.B. 1966. “A British Rejection of Economic Orthodoxy.” The Southwestern Science Quarterly (09): 172–180.Google Scholar
Edgeworth, F.Y. 1894. “J.S.Nicholson and Consumer Rent.” Economic Journal 4: 151–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edgeworth, F.Y. 1907. “Obituary of John Kells Ingram.” Economic Journal 17: 299–301.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1995. A Soaring Eagle: Alfred Marshall 1842–1924. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ingram, J.K. 1878. “The Present Position and Prospects of Political Economy.” In Smyth, R. L., ed., Essays in Economic Method. London: Duckworth, 1962, pp. 41–72.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1882a. “Leslie, Cliffe. T.E.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 14, pp. 477–78.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1882b. “McCulloch, J.R.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 15, pp. 134–35.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1883a. “Quesnay, F.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 20, pp. 176–77.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1883b. “Ricardo, D.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 20, pp. 533–35.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1885. “Political Economy.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 19, pp. 346–401Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1886a. “Say, J.B.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 21, pp. 360–61.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1886b. “Senior, W.N.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 21, pp. 663–64.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1887a. “Slavery.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 22, pp. 129–44.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1887b. “Smith, A.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 22, pp. 168–71.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1887c. “Sumptuary Laws.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 22, pp. 643–45.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1888a. “Turgot, A.R.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 23, pp. 627–30.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1888b. “Young, A.”. Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 24, pp. 755–56.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1888c. A History of Political Economy. Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P. 1895. A History of Slavery and Serfdom. London: Adams & Charles Black.Google Scholar
Jevons, W.S. 1876. “The Future of Political Economy.” Fortnightly Review 20: 186–207.Google Scholar
Jevons, W.S. 1877. “De Morgan, Augustus.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 7, pp. 64–67.Google Scholar
Jevons, W.S. 1878. Primer of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jevons, W.S. 1879. The Theory of Political Economy, With Preface and Notes and An Extension of the Bibliography of Mathematical Economic Writings, 2nd ed.New York: A. M. Kelley, 1965.Google Scholar
Jevons, W.S. 1881. “Richard Cantillon and the Nationality of Political Economy.” Contemporary Review 39: 61–80.Google Scholar
Keynes, J.N. 1890. The Scope and Method of Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelly, 1986.Google Scholar
Koot, G.M. 1987. English Historical Economics, 1870–1926: The Rise of Economic History and Neomercantilism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, T.E.C. 1862. “The Love of Money.” Reprinted in Essays in Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelly, 1969, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
Leslie, T.E.C. 1863. “The Wealth of Nations and Slave Power.” Reprinted in Essays in Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelly, 1969, pp. 9–20.Google Scholar
Leslie, T.E.C. 1868. “Political Economy and Emigration.” Reprinted in Land Systems and Industrial Economy of Ireland, England, and Continental Countries. New York: A. M. Kelley, 1968, pp. 84–116.Google Scholar
Leslie, T.E.C. 1876. “On the Philosophical Method of Political Economy.” In Essays in Political Economy. New York: A. M. Kelly, 1969, pp. 95–100.Google Scholar
Leslie, T.E. Cliffe. 1878. “Review of Political Economy. A Primer, by W.S. Jevons, Political Economy: Its Meaning, Method, Limit, and Nature, by A.S. Bolles, and The Economy of Consumption, by R.S. Moffat.” The Academy 30: 273–75.Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Political Economy. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J.R. 1817. “Political Economy.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 5th ed.Google Scholar
McCulloch, J.R. 1825. The Principles of Poitical Economy with Sketches of the Rise and Progress of the Science. London: Alex, Murray and Son, 1870.Google Scholar
Mill, J.S. 1865. Auguste Comte and Positivism. In Robson, J. M., ed., The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. 10. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1969, pp. 261–368.Google Scholar
Maloney, J. 1985. Marshall, Orthodoxy and the Professionalism of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G.C.G. 1991. “A Biographical Sketch of John Kells Ingram.” History of Economics Review 15: 3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G.C.G. 1995. “The Role of Cliffe Leslie in the Early Stages of the English Methodenstreit.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 17: 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G.C.G. 1996a. “Robert Lowe and the Role of the Vulgar Economist in the English Methodenstreit.” Journal of Economic Methodology 3: 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G.C.G. 1996b. “The Practical Economics of Walter Bagehot.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G.C.G. 1999. “John Kells Ingram, the Comtean Movement and the English Methodenstreit.” History of Political Economy 31: 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merely, J. 1886. Critical Miscellanies, 3 vols. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1878. Effects of Machinery on Wages. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell & Co.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1885a. “A Plea for Orthodox Political Economy.” The National Review 6: 553–68.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1885b. “An Article on Political Economy in the Encyclopaedia Britannica.” The Scotsman, Saturday, 06 27.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1888a “A History of Political Economy, by John Kells Ingram.” The Scotsman, Monday, 04 23.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1888b. “Taxation.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 23 pp. 85–89Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1888c. “Usury.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 24, pp. 17–19.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1888d. “Value.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 24, pp. 45–52.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1888e. “Wages.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 24, pp. 306–13.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1888f. “Wealth.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 24, pp. 461–62.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1893 “The Reaction in Favour of the Classical Political Economy.” In Smyth, R. L., ed., Essays in Economic Method. London: Duckworth, 1962, pp. 112–25.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1893–1901. Principles of Political Economy. 3 Vols. London: Black.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J.S. 1894b. “Political Economy and Journalism.” Economic Journal 4: 393–408.Google Scholar
Price, L.L. 1892a. “Adam Smith and Recent Economics.” In Economic Science and Practice. London: Methuen, 1896, pp. 273–95.Google Scholar
Price, L.L. 1892b. “A Recent Economic Treatise.” In Economic Science and Practice. London: Methuen, 1896, pp. 296–320.Google Scholar
Robertson Smith, W. 1889. “Preface.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., Index, v–vi.Google Scholar
Rogers, J.E.T. 1869. “Adam Smith.” In Historical Gleanings, 2 vols. London: Macmillan, pp. 95–137.Google Scholar
Rogers, J.E.T. 1879. “Finance.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 9, pp. 171–91.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. 1954. History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen & Unwin, 1986.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1879. “Ethics.” Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th ed., vol. 8, pp. 574–611.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, H. 1886. Outlines of A History of Ethics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Seligman, E.R.A. 1888. “Review of A History of Political Economy, by J.K. Ingram.” Political Science Quarterly 3: 364–65.Google Scholar
Seligman, E.R.A. 1903. “Neglected Economists, Parts I and II.” Economic Journal 13: 335–63, 511–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W.R. 1875. “Bible.” Encyclopaedia Britannica 9th ed., vol. 1, pp. 634–48.Google Scholar
Somers, R. 1876. “Exchange.” Encyclopaedia Britannica 9th ed., vol. 8, pp. 784–96.Google Scholar
Whitaker, J.K. 1996. The Correspondence of Alfred Marshall, Economist, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar