Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T17:56:06.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE NEED FOR GOVERNMENTAL INEFFICIENCY IN PLATO’S REPUBLIC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Gil Hersch*
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Abstract

In Book II of Plato’s Republic, Socrates discusses the cities of necessity and luxury (372d–373a). Discussions of these cities have often focused on citizens desiring more than they need, which creates a demand for luxury. Yet the second part of the equation, which is not usually recognized, is that there must be sufficient supply to meet this demand. The focus of this article is on the importance of supply in the discussion of the first two cities in Book II of the Republic. This article argues that the way Plato models the cities makes it the case that a surplus above levels of necessity will be generated from time to time. That the unwanted surplus cannot be spontaneously disposed of entails that the first two cities are institutionally incomplete. A government is needed in order to coordinate the disposal of the surplus supply the city will produce.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© The History of Economics Society, 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper was significantly improved thanks to discussions and feedback from several individuals. I thank Georgios Anagnostopoulos, C. Tyler DesRoches, Sukaina Hirji, Monte Johnson, Brian Marrin, Rachel Singpurwalla, and several anonymous referees for comments on earlier drafts. I also thank audiences at the 2016 History of Economic Thought Society Conference and at the 2016 Philosophy of Social Science Round Table.

References

REFERENCES

Amemiya, Takeshi. 2007. Economy and Economics of Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berry, Christopher J. 1989. “Of Pigs and Men: Luxury in Plato’s Republic.” Polis: The Journal for Ancient Greek Political Thought 8 (1): 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnyeat, Myles F. 1997. “Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic.” In Peterson, G. B., ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 215324.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1989. Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 2009. “If No Capacities Then No Credible Worlds, but Can Models Reveal Capacities?Erkenntnis 70 (1): 4558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crombie, Ian M. 1962. An Examination of Plato’s Doctrines. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cross, Robert C., and Woozley, Anthony D.. 1964. Plato’s Republic: A Philosophical Commentary. London: Macmillian Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devereux, Daniel. 1979. “Socrates’ First City in the Republic.” Apeiron 13 (1): 3640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrari, Giovanni R. F. 1990. “Reviewed Work: Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic by C. D. C. Reeve.” The American Journal of Philology 111 (1): 105109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuks, Alexander. 1977. “Plato and the Social Question: The Problem of Poverty and Riches in the ‘Republic.’Ancient Society 8: 4983.Google Scholar
Futter, Dylan. 2017. “The Dialectic of Community in Plato’s Republic.” Akroterion 62 (2): 2336.Google Scholar
Jonas, Mark, Nakazawa, Yoshiaki, and Braun, James. 2012. “Appetite, Reason, and Education in Socrates’ ‘City of Pigs.’Phronesis 57 (4): 332357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäki, Uskali. 2009. “MISSing the World. Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems.” Erkenntnis 70 (1): 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malthus, Thomas Robert. 1798. An Essay on the Principle of Population. London: J. Johnson.Google Scholar
Mas-Colell, Andreu, Whinston, Michael D., and Green, Jerry R.. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKeen, Catherine. 2004. “Swillsburg City Limits.” Polis 21 (1–2): 7092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNulty, Paul. 1975. “A Note on the Division of Labor in Plato and Smith.” History of Political Economy 7 (3): 372378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 1999. “Learning from Models.” In Morgan, M. and Morrison, M., eds., Models as Mediators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 348388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, Donald R. 2007. “The Utopian Character of Plato’s Ideal City.” In Ferrari, G. R. F., ed., The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 232255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, . 1992. Republic. Trans. by Grube, G. M. A. and Reeve, C. D. C.. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (David). 1988. Philosopher-Kings: The Argument of Plato’s Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Rosen, Stanley. 2005. Plato’s Republic: A Study. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, Malcolm. 1999. Saving the City: Philosopher-Kings and Other Classical Paradigms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Silvermintz, Daniel. 2010. “Plato’s Supposed Defense of the Division of Labor: A Re-examination of the Role of Job Specialization in the Republic.” History of Political Economy 42 (4): 747772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Adam. 2003. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York: Bantam Classic.Google Scholar
Sugden, Robert. 2000. “Credible Worlds: The Status of Theoretical Models in Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 7 (1): 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugden, Robert. 2009. “Credible Worlds, Capacities and Mechanisms.” Erkenntnis 70 (1): 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, John R. 2001. The Platonic Political Art. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Joshua. 2009. “The Market in Plato’s ‘Republic.’Classical Philology 104 (4): 439458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, John. 1989. “Imitation.” St. John’s Review 39: 173200.Google Scholar