Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:34:43.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MORE ECONOMICS, PLEASE: WE'RE HISTORIANS OF ECONOMICS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

IVAN MOSCATI
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Mini-symposium on the Future of History of Economics: Young Scholars' Perspective
Information
Journal of the History of Economic Thought , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 85 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © The History of Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gomez Betancourt, Rebeca and Tobon, Alexander. 2006. “In Search of a Definition for the History of Economic Thought.” Paper presented at ESHET 2006 Conference, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
Hands, D. Wade. 2001. Reflections without Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Daniel B. and Chiang, Eric. 2004. “The Social Science Citation Index: A Black Box–with an Ideological Bias?” Econ Journal Watch 1 (April): 134–65.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2002a. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2002b. “A Pall along the Watchtower: On Leaving the HOPE Conference.” In Roy Weintraub, E., ed., The Future of the History of Economics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 378–90.Google Scholar
Mirowski, Philip. 2004. The Effortless Economy of Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Moggridge, Donald E. 1992. “Comment.” History of Political Economy 24 (Spring): 224–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palma, Nuno P. G. 2008. “History of Economics or a Selected History of Economics?” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 30 (March): XX–XX.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, Margaret. 1992. “Breaking Away: History of Economics as History of Science.” History of Political Economy 24 (Spring): 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schabas, Margaret. 2002. “Coming Together: History of Economics as History of Science.” In Roy Weintraub, E., ed., The Future of the History of Economics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 208–25.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1996. “What Defines a Legitimate Contribution to the Subdiscipline ‘The History of Economics’?” HES Editorial, athttp://eh.net/pipermail/hes/1996-September/005766.html.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 1999. “How Should We Write the History of Twentieth-Century Economics?” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 15 (Winter): 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2002. How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2006. “Letter to the Editors.” Econ Journal Watch 3 (January): 206–09.Google Scholar
Weintraub, E. Roy. 2007. “Economic Science Wars.” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 29 (September): 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar